Effects of mechanical cockle harvesting on intertidal communities

Summary 1. Shellfish of marketable size can be harvested much more quickly and efficiently using mechanical methods such as tractor‐powered harvesters and suction dredgers than by traditional methods. The adverse effects of such machines on non‐target organisms need to be considered carefully before...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Applied Ecology
Main Authors: Ferns, P.N., Rostron, D.M., Siman, H.Y.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2000
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00509.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2664.2000.00509.x
https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00509.x
id crwiley:10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00509.x
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00509.x 2024-09-15T18:26:53+00:00 Effects of mechanical cockle harvesting on intertidal communities Ferns, P.N. Rostron, D.M. Siman, H.Y. 2000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00509.x https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2664.2000.00509.x https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00509.x en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Journal of Applied Ecology volume 37, issue 3, page 464-474 ISSN 0021-8901 1365-2664 journal-article 2000 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00509.x 2024-08-06T04:21:33Z Summary 1. Shellfish of marketable size can be harvested much more quickly and efficiently using mechanical methods such as tractor‐powered harvesters and suction dredgers than by traditional methods. The adverse effects of such machines on non‐target organisms need to be considered carefully before licensing such activities. 2. A tractor‐towed cockle harvester was used to extract cockles from intertidal plots of muddy sand and clean sand in order to investigate the effects on other benthic invertebrates and their predators. 3. Harvesting resulted in the loss of a significant proportion of the most common invertebrates from both areas, ranging in the muddy sand from 31% of Scoloplos armiger (Polychaeta) (initial density 120 m −2 ) to 83% of Pygospio elegans (Polychaeta) (initial density 1850 m −2 ). Significant effects could not be detected in most populations with a density of less than 100 m −2 . 4. Populations of Pygospio elegans and Hydrobia ulvae (Gastropoda) remained significantly depleted in the area of muddy sand for more than 100 days after harvesting, and Nephtys hombergi (Polychaeta), Scoloplos armiger and Bathyporeia pilosa (Amphipoda) for more than 50 days. 5. Invertebrate populations in clean sand with relatively few cockles Cerastoderma edule (Pelecypoda) recovered more quickly than those in muddy sand with a more structured community, which included several tube‐dwelling species such as Pygospio elegans and Lanice conchilega (Polychaeta). 6. Bird feeding activity increased at first on the harvested areas, with gulls and waders taking advantage of invertebrates made available by harvesting. Subsequently, in the area of muddy sand, the level of bird activity declined compared with control areas. It remained significantly reduced in curlews Numenius arquata and gulls for more than 80 days after harvesting and in oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus for more than 50 days. 7. It is concluded from this study that tractor dredging for cockles in high density areas causes a sufficiently large mortality ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Numenius arquata Wiley Online Library Journal of Applied Ecology 37 3 464 474
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Summary 1. Shellfish of marketable size can be harvested much more quickly and efficiently using mechanical methods such as tractor‐powered harvesters and suction dredgers than by traditional methods. The adverse effects of such machines on non‐target organisms need to be considered carefully before licensing such activities. 2. A tractor‐towed cockle harvester was used to extract cockles from intertidal plots of muddy sand and clean sand in order to investigate the effects on other benthic invertebrates and their predators. 3. Harvesting resulted in the loss of a significant proportion of the most common invertebrates from both areas, ranging in the muddy sand from 31% of Scoloplos armiger (Polychaeta) (initial density 120 m −2 ) to 83% of Pygospio elegans (Polychaeta) (initial density 1850 m −2 ). Significant effects could not be detected in most populations with a density of less than 100 m −2 . 4. Populations of Pygospio elegans and Hydrobia ulvae (Gastropoda) remained significantly depleted in the area of muddy sand for more than 100 days after harvesting, and Nephtys hombergi (Polychaeta), Scoloplos armiger and Bathyporeia pilosa (Amphipoda) for more than 50 days. 5. Invertebrate populations in clean sand with relatively few cockles Cerastoderma edule (Pelecypoda) recovered more quickly than those in muddy sand with a more structured community, which included several tube‐dwelling species such as Pygospio elegans and Lanice conchilega (Polychaeta). 6. Bird feeding activity increased at first on the harvested areas, with gulls and waders taking advantage of invertebrates made available by harvesting. Subsequently, in the area of muddy sand, the level of bird activity declined compared with control areas. It remained significantly reduced in curlews Numenius arquata and gulls for more than 80 days after harvesting and in oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus for more than 50 days. 7. It is concluded from this study that tractor dredging for cockles in high density areas causes a sufficiently large mortality ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Ferns, P.N.
Rostron, D.M.
Siman, H.Y.
spellingShingle Ferns, P.N.
Rostron, D.M.
Siman, H.Y.
Effects of mechanical cockle harvesting on intertidal communities
author_facet Ferns, P.N.
Rostron, D.M.
Siman, H.Y.
author_sort Ferns, P.N.
title Effects of mechanical cockle harvesting on intertidal communities
title_short Effects of mechanical cockle harvesting on intertidal communities
title_full Effects of mechanical cockle harvesting on intertidal communities
title_fullStr Effects of mechanical cockle harvesting on intertidal communities
title_full_unstemmed Effects of mechanical cockle harvesting on intertidal communities
title_sort effects of mechanical cockle harvesting on intertidal communities
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2000
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00509.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2664.2000.00509.x
https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00509.x
genre Numenius arquata
genre_facet Numenius arquata
op_source Journal of Applied Ecology
volume 37, issue 3, page 464-474
ISSN 0021-8901 1365-2664
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00509.x
container_title Journal of Applied Ecology
container_volume 37
container_issue 3
container_start_page 464
op_container_end_page 474
_version_ 1810467512556453888