A demographic comparison of two southern elephant seal populations

Summary To estimate concurrent age‐specific survival for southern elephant seals at Macquarie and Marion islands, seals were marked from 1993 to 1997 in the first 3 weeks of life and resighted (recaptured) on return to their natal islands (1994–2001). These recaptures formed the basis for the surviv...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Animal Ecology
Main Authors: Mcmahon, Clive R., Burton, Harry R., Bester, Marthán N.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2003
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00685.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2656.2003.00685.x
https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00685.x
id crwiley:10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00685.x
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00685.x 2024-09-15T18:04:40+00:00 A demographic comparison of two southern elephant seal populations Mcmahon, Clive R. Burton, Harry R. Bester, Marthán N. 2003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00685.x https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2656.2003.00685.x https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00685.x en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Journal of Animal Ecology volume 72, issue 1, page 61-74 ISSN 0021-8790 1365-2656 journal-article 2003 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00685.x 2024-08-15T04:20:06Z Summary To estimate concurrent age‐specific survival for southern elephant seals at Macquarie and Marion islands, seals were marked from 1993 to 1997 in the first 3 weeks of life and resighted (recaptured) on return to their natal islands (1994–2001). These recaptures formed the basis for the survival analysis in the mark–recapture program mark . Weaning masses were collected at each location. Recapture probabilities were ( = 376·480, P < 0·0001) higher at Marion Island than at Macquarie Island. There are two possible reasons: (1) the population at Marion Island is smaller and less dense than at Macquarie Island and (2) seals hauled out along a smaller section of the coast at Marion Island than at Macquarie Island, which: (1) facilitates the detection and individual identification of seals and (2) increases access to hauled out seals. Age‐specific survival estimates (corrected for preweaning mortality and tag loss) differed ( = 22·264, P < 0·05) at the two islands and were consistently higher at Macquarie Island. The survival estimates for male and female seals were different at Macquarie Island ( = 34·657, P < 0·0001) and Marion Island ( = 20·373, P = 0·002). Female survival estimates were higher than male survival estimates. The combined survival estimates for juvenile seals (1–3 years) differed between islands but survival of older seals (4–6 years) did not. The inclusion of gender in the survival models did not improve model performance and hence male and female estimates were considered jointly. The mean wean masses of male and female seals combined from 1993 to 1998 were not different between islands (T 6837 = 1·169, P = 0·242). At Macquarie Island the mean annual wean mass was 118·8 kg (SD = 27·2, n = 6504) while at Marion Island it was 120·6 kg (SD = 24·7, n = 335). The mean age at first breeding was different ( P < 0·001) at the two island populations. At Macquarie Island the mean age of first breeding was 4·68 years, and at Marion Island it was 3·95 years. More ( = 67·39, P < 0·0001) ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Elephant Seal Elephant Seals Macquarie Island Marion Island Southern Elephant Seal Southern Elephant Seals Wiley Online Library Journal of Animal Ecology 72 1 61 74
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Summary To estimate concurrent age‐specific survival for southern elephant seals at Macquarie and Marion islands, seals were marked from 1993 to 1997 in the first 3 weeks of life and resighted (recaptured) on return to their natal islands (1994–2001). These recaptures formed the basis for the survival analysis in the mark–recapture program mark . Weaning masses were collected at each location. Recapture probabilities were ( = 376·480, P < 0·0001) higher at Marion Island than at Macquarie Island. There are two possible reasons: (1) the population at Marion Island is smaller and less dense than at Macquarie Island and (2) seals hauled out along a smaller section of the coast at Marion Island than at Macquarie Island, which: (1) facilitates the detection and individual identification of seals and (2) increases access to hauled out seals. Age‐specific survival estimates (corrected for preweaning mortality and tag loss) differed ( = 22·264, P < 0·05) at the two islands and were consistently higher at Macquarie Island. The survival estimates for male and female seals were different at Macquarie Island ( = 34·657, P < 0·0001) and Marion Island ( = 20·373, P = 0·002). Female survival estimates were higher than male survival estimates. The combined survival estimates for juvenile seals (1–3 years) differed between islands but survival of older seals (4–6 years) did not. The inclusion of gender in the survival models did not improve model performance and hence male and female estimates were considered jointly. The mean wean masses of male and female seals combined from 1993 to 1998 were not different between islands (T 6837 = 1·169, P = 0·242). At Macquarie Island the mean annual wean mass was 118·8 kg (SD = 27·2, n = 6504) while at Marion Island it was 120·6 kg (SD = 24·7, n = 335). The mean age at first breeding was different ( P < 0·001) at the two island populations. At Macquarie Island the mean age of first breeding was 4·68 years, and at Marion Island it was 3·95 years. More ( = 67·39, P < 0·0001) ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Mcmahon, Clive R.
Burton, Harry R.
Bester, Marthán N.
spellingShingle Mcmahon, Clive R.
Burton, Harry R.
Bester, Marthán N.
A demographic comparison of two southern elephant seal populations
author_facet Mcmahon, Clive R.
Burton, Harry R.
Bester, Marthán N.
author_sort Mcmahon, Clive R.
title A demographic comparison of two southern elephant seal populations
title_short A demographic comparison of two southern elephant seal populations
title_full A demographic comparison of two southern elephant seal populations
title_fullStr A demographic comparison of two southern elephant seal populations
title_full_unstemmed A demographic comparison of two southern elephant seal populations
title_sort demographic comparison of two southern elephant seal populations
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2003
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00685.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2656.2003.00685.x
https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00685.x
genre Elephant Seal
Elephant Seals
Macquarie Island
Marion Island
Southern Elephant Seal
Southern Elephant Seals
genre_facet Elephant Seal
Elephant Seals
Macquarie Island
Marion Island
Southern Elephant Seal
Southern Elephant Seals
op_source Journal of Animal Ecology
volume 72, issue 1, page 61-74
ISSN 0021-8790 1365-2656
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00685.x
container_title Journal of Animal Ecology
container_volume 72
container_issue 1
container_start_page 61
op_container_end_page 74
_version_ 1810442284037046272