The high‐latitude terrestrial carbon sink: a model analysis
Summary A dynamic, global vegetation model, hybrid v4.1 ( Friend et al . 1997 ), was driven by transient climate output from the UK Hadley Centre GCM (HadCM2) with the IS92a scenario of increasing atmospheric CO 2 equivalent, sulphate aerosols and predicted patterns of atmospheric N deposition. Chan...
Published in: | Global Change Biology |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2000
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00302.x https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2486.2000.00302.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00302.x |
Summary: | Summary A dynamic, global vegetation model, hybrid v4.1 ( Friend et al . 1997 ), was driven by transient climate output from the UK Hadley Centre GCM (HadCM2) with the IS92a scenario of increasing atmospheric CO 2 equivalent, sulphate aerosols and predicted patterns of atmospheric N deposition. Changes in areas of vegetation types and carbon storage in biomass and soils were predicted for areas north of 50°N from 1860 to 2100. Hybrid is a combined biogeochemical, biophysical and biogeographical model of natural, potential ecosystems. The effect of periodic boreal forest fires was assessed by adding a simple stochastic fire model. Hybrid represents plant physiological and soil processes regulating the carbon, water and N cycles and competition between individuals of parameterized generalized plant types. The latter were combined to represent tundra, temperate grassland, temperate/mixed forest and coniferous forest. The model simulated the current areas and estimated carbon stocks in the four vegetation types. It was predicted that land areas above 50°N (about 23% of the vegetated global land area) are currently accumulating about 0.4 PgC y −1 (about 30% of the estimated global terrestrial sink) and that this sink could grow to 0.8–1.0 PgC y −1 by the second half of the next century and persist undiminished until 2100. This sink was due mainly to an increase in forest productivity and biomass in response to increasing atmospheric CO 2 , temperature and N deposition, and includes an estimate of the effect of boreal forest fire, which was estimated to diminish the sink approximately by the amount of carbon emitted to the atmosphere during fires. Averaged over the region, N deposition contributed about 18% to the sink by the 2080 s. As expected, climate change (temperature, precipitation, solar radiation and saturation pressure deficit) and N deposition without increasing atmospheric CO 2 produced a carbon source. Forest areas expanded both south and north, halving the current tundra area by 2100. This expansion ... |
---|