Relationships between body composition, body size and alternative reproductive tactics in a lekking sandpiper, the Ruff ( Philomachus pugnax)

1. The Ruff is a lekking sandpiper in which males have two genetically determined alternative mating strategies: ‘satellite’ or ‘independent’. Satellite males are non‐territorial, following groups of females on and off leks. Independent males attempt to establish territories on leks and can be eithe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Functional Ecology
Main Authors: Bachman, G., Widemo, F.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 1999
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00323.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2435.1999.00323.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00323.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00323.x
https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00323.x
id crwiley:10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00323.x
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00323.x 2024-06-02T08:13:12+00:00 Relationships between body composition, body size and alternative reproductive tactics in a lekking sandpiper, the Ruff ( Philomachus pugnax) Bachman, G. Widemo, F. 1999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00323.x https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2435.1999.00323.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00323.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00323.x https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00323.x en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Functional Ecology volume 13, issue 3, page 411-416 ISSN 0269-8463 1365-2435 journal-article 1999 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00323.x 2024-05-03T11:21:35Z 1. The Ruff is a lekking sandpiper in which males have two genetically determined alternative mating strategies: ‘satellite’ or ‘independent’. Satellite males are non‐territorial, following groups of females on and off leks. Independent males attempt to establish territories on leks and can be either ‘resident’ territory holders, or non‐territorial ‘marginals’. The time budgets of the three behavioural tactics (resident, marginal and satellite) differ notably in time allocated to foraging, aggression and display activity. These differences have led to the suggestion that the benefits of size and energy stores may vary with mating tactic. 2. In this paper in vivo estimates of body composition (fat, fat‐free mass) for breeding male Ruffs using total body electrical conductivity (TOBEC) are presented. 3. Satellite males have significantly shorter tarsi and wings than independent males. 4. After correcting for size, independent males are significantly heavier and fatter than satellites, and marginals in particular are heavier and fatter than both residents and satellites. 5. Estimates of energy expenditure during flight suggest that satellites may maintain reduced energy reserves to minimize flight costs, while the larger fat stores of independent males are consistent with the benefits of endurance as a territory holder. Article in Journal/Newspaper Philomachus pugnax Ruff Wiley Online Library Functional Ecology 13 3 411 416
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description 1. The Ruff is a lekking sandpiper in which males have two genetically determined alternative mating strategies: ‘satellite’ or ‘independent’. Satellite males are non‐territorial, following groups of females on and off leks. Independent males attempt to establish territories on leks and can be either ‘resident’ territory holders, or non‐territorial ‘marginals’. The time budgets of the three behavioural tactics (resident, marginal and satellite) differ notably in time allocated to foraging, aggression and display activity. These differences have led to the suggestion that the benefits of size and energy stores may vary with mating tactic. 2. In this paper in vivo estimates of body composition (fat, fat‐free mass) for breeding male Ruffs using total body electrical conductivity (TOBEC) are presented. 3. Satellite males have significantly shorter tarsi and wings than independent males. 4. After correcting for size, independent males are significantly heavier and fatter than satellites, and marginals in particular are heavier and fatter than both residents and satellites. 5. Estimates of energy expenditure during flight suggest that satellites may maintain reduced energy reserves to minimize flight costs, while the larger fat stores of independent males are consistent with the benefits of endurance as a territory holder.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Bachman, G.
Widemo, F.
spellingShingle Bachman, G.
Widemo, F.
Relationships between body composition, body size and alternative reproductive tactics in a lekking sandpiper, the Ruff ( Philomachus pugnax)
author_facet Bachman, G.
Widemo, F.
author_sort Bachman, G.
title Relationships between body composition, body size and alternative reproductive tactics in a lekking sandpiper, the Ruff ( Philomachus pugnax)
title_short Relationships between body composition, body size and alternative reproductive tactics in a lekking sandpiper, the Ruff ( Philomachus pugnax)
title_full Relationships between body composition, body size and alternative reproductive tactics in a lekking sandpiper, the Ruff ( Philomachus pugnax)
title_fullStr Relationships between body composition, body size and alternative reproductive tactics in a lekking sandpiper, the Ruff ( Philomachus pugnax)
title_full_unstemmed Relationships between body composition, body size and alternative reproductive tactics in a lekking sandpiper, the Ruff ( Philomachus pugnax)
title_sort relationships between body composition, body size and alternative reproductive tactics in a lekking sandpiper, the ruff ( philomachus pugnax)
publisher Wiley
publishDate 1999
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00323.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2435.1999.00323.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00323.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00323.x
https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00323.x
genre Philomachus pugnax
Ruff
genre_facet Philomachus pugnax
Ruff
op_source Functional Ecology
volume 13, issue 3, page 411-416
ISSN 0269-8463 1365-2435
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00323.x
container_title Functional Ecology
container_volume 13
container_issue 3
container_start_page 411
op_container_end_page 416
_version_ 1800736611673047040