The soil skeleton, a forgotten pool of carbon and nitrogen in soil

• Published in: European Journal of Soil Science
• Main Authors: Corti, G., Ugolini, F. C., Agnelli, A., Certini, G., Cuniglio, R., Berna, F., Fernández Sanjurjo, M. J.
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2002
• Subjects: Arctic
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2389.2002.00442.x; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2389.2002.00442.x; http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1046/j.1365-2389.2002.00442.x/fullpdf

Summary To evaluate the contribution of rock fragments to the soil’s total carbon content, the soil of 26 sites, ranging from the Canadian Arctic to the Jordan desert, was analysed for the content of organic C and total N in both fine earth and skeleton fractions. The soils, uncultivated and cultivated, are derived from 11 parent materials: sandstone, mica‐schist, granite, gneiss, basaltic pyroclastites, trachyte, dolomite, beach deposits, clay schist, marl and serpentinite. For each soil horizon the contents of fine earth and skeleton were determined by volume. Both fractions were analysed for bulk density, total and organic C and total N. Our results indicate that rock fragments contain amounts of C and N that depend on the nature of the parent material and on its resistance to the weathering processes. The C and N of both fine earth and skeleton were used to calculate the contents of these elements for three depths. At each depth, the skeleton contributes C and N to the soil depending on its abundance. We conclude that the contribution of the rock fragments to the soil C and N cannot be predicted from the soil taxa, but can from the parent material. Calculations that exclude C and N of the skeleton could lead to errors in the estimates of these two elements in soils.