Dynamics of springtail and mite populations: the role of density dependence, predation, and weather

• Published in: Ecological Entomology
• Main Authors: Ferguson, Steven H., Joly, Damien O.
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2002
• Subjects: Mite; Springtail
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2311.2002.00441.x; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2311.2002.00441.x; http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1046/j.1365-2311.2002.00441.x/fullpdf

Abstract 1. Ecological theory suggests that density‐dependent regulation of organism abundance will vary from exogenous to endogenous factors depending on trophic structure. Changes in abundance of soil arthropods were investigated at three trophic levels, springtails (Collembola), predaceous mites (Acari), and macro‐arthropods (spider, adult and larval beetles, centipedes). Predictions were that springtails are predator regulated and mites are food limited according to the Hairston et al . (1960) model, which predicts alternating regulation by competition and predation from fungi to springtails to mites to macro‐arthropods. The alternate hypothesis was based on the bottom‐up model of trophic dynamics, which predicts that each trophic level is regulated by competition for resources. 2. The relative contributions to springtail and mite population dynamics of endogenous (i.e. density‐dependent population growth related to food availability) and exogenous (i.e. predation and weather) factors were tested using time‐series analysis and experimental manipulation of water conditions. Box patterns were distributed within an aspen forest habitat located in the Canadian prairies and surveyed weekly from May to September 1997–1999. Each box depressed the leaf litter, creating a microhabitat island for soil arthropods that provided counts of invertebrates located immediately beneath the boxes. 3. Strong evidence was found for endogenous control of springtail and mite numbers, indicated by a reduction in population growth related to density in the previous week. Contrary to predictions, no evidence was found for regulation of springtail numbers by mites, or for regulation of mite numbers by macro‐arthropods. Springtail population growth rate was related positively to current springtail density (8 and 23% variation explained) and related negatively to 1‐week lagged density (85 and 58%), and related negatively to temperature (5 and 5%) for time‐series data and for experimental addition of water respectively. Mite population ...