Pharaonic Egypt and the origins of plague

Abstract Aim This paper examines the possibility that bubonic plague was a disease endemic in the wild rodent population of Egypt and East Africa. Location The study focuses on Egypt and the Nile Valley during the Pharaonic period. Methods This paper presents a hypothesis based on archaeoentomologic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Biogeography
Main Author: Panagiotakopulu, Eva
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0305-0270.2003.01009.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1046%2Fj.0305-0270.2003.01009.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046/j.0305-0270.2003.01009.x
id crwiley:10.1046/j.0305-0270.2003.01009.x
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1046/j.0305-0270.2003.01009.x 2024-06-02T08:13:43+00:00 Pharaonic Egypt and the origins of plague Panagiotakopulu, Eva 2004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0305-0270.2003.01009.x https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1046%2Fj.0305-0270.2003.01009.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046/j.0305-0270.2003.01009.x en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Journal of Biogeography volume 31, issue 2, page 269-275 ISSN 0305-0270 1365-2699 journal-article 2004 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0305-0270.2003.01009.x 2024-05-03T11:36:18Z Abstract Aim This paper examines the possibility that bubonic plague was a disease endemic in the wild rodent population of Egypt and East Africa. Location The study focuses on Egypt and the Nile Valley during the Pharaonic period. Methods This paper presents a hypothesis based on archaeoentomological, archaeozoological and biogeographical information on the insect and small mammal species involved in the spread of plague, as well as relevant information from early literary sources. Results The primary host for the rat flea Xenopsylla cheopis is the Nile rat, Arvicanthis niloticus . Urbanization and the Nile floods brought into contact humans and the Nile rat and its ectoparasite, Xenopsylla cheopis , which was able to move to a newly introduced host the synanthropic Rattus rattus . The existence of large numbers of human fleas and squalid conditions from the Workmens’ Village at Amarna, evidence for nile rats and black rats from Pharaonic sites and descriptions of an epidemic disease in the Amarna letters, the Hittitic archives and the Ebers papyrus with references to swelling buboes, present a new scenario for the origins of the disease. Main conclusions Most modern researchers have regarded the origins of bubonic plague as a disease of Central Asiatic rodents. Here, I examine the evidence for plague in Egypt, and suggest that the bacillus Yersinia pestis was primarily a disease of the Nile rat, Arvicanthis niloticus , which only achieved epidemic proportions when its vector, the tropical rat flea, Xenopsylla cheopis , was able to make the jump to a new host, the black or ship rat, Rattus rattus , introduced from India or indirectly via Mesopotamia during the Pharaonic period. Synanthropy and a high death rate in the new host lead to frequent transfer to human populations and stochastic waves of pandemics. Article in Journal/Newspaper Rattus rattus Wiley Online Library Journal of Biogeography 31 2 269 275
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract Aim This paper examines the possibility that bubonic plague was a disease endemic in the wild rodent population of Egypt and East Africa. Location The study focuses on Egypt and the Nile Valley during the Pharaonic period. Methods This paper presents a hypothesis based on archaeoentomological, archaeozoological and biogeographical information on the insect and small mammal species involved in the spread of plague, as well as relevant information from early literary sources. Results The primary host for the rat flea Xenopsylla cheopis is the Nile rat, Arvicanthis niloticus . Urbanization and the Nile floods brought into contact humans and the Nile rat and its ectoparasite, Xenopsylla cheopis , which was able to move to a newly introduced host the synanthropic Rattus rattus . The existence of large numbers of human fleas and squalid conditions from the Workmens’ Village at Amarna, evidence for nile rats and black rats from Pharaonic sites and descriptions of an epidemic disease in the Amarna letters, the Hittitic archives and the Ebers papyrus with references to swelling buboes, present a new scenario for the origins of the disease. Main conclusions Most modern researchers have regarded the origins of bubonic plague as a disease of Central Asiatic rodents. Here, I examine the evidence for plague in Egypt, and suggest that the bacillus Yersinia pestis was primarily a disease of the Nile rat, Arvicanthis niloticus , which only achieved epidemic proportions when its vector, the tropical rat flea, Xenopsylla cheopis , was able to make the jump to a new host, the black or ship rat, Rattus rattus , introduced from India or indirectly via Mesopotamia during the Pharaonic period. Synanthropy and a high death rate in the new host lead to frequent transfer to human populations and stochastic waves of pandemics.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Panagiotakopulu, Eva
spellingShingle Panagiotakopulu, Eva
Pharaonic Egypt and the origins of plague
author_facet Panagiotakopulu, Eva
author_sort Panagiotakopulu, Eva
title Pharaonic Egypt and the origins of plague
title_short Pharaonic Egypt and the origins of plague
title_full Pharaonic Egypt and the origins of plague
title_fullStr Pharaonic Egypt and the origins of plague
title_full_unstemmed Pharaonic Egypt and the origins of plague
title_sort pharaonic egypt and the origins of plague
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2004
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0305-0270.2003.01009.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1046%2Fj.0305-0270.2003.01009.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046/j.0305-0270.2003.01009.x
genre Rattus rattus
genre_facet Rattus rattus
op_source Journal of Biogeography
volume 31, issue 2, page 269-275
ISSN 0305-0270 1365-2699
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0305-0270.2003.01009.x
container_title Journal of Biogeography
container_volume 31
container_issue 2
container_start_page 269
op_container_end_page 275
_version_ 1800737302825140224