A comparative test of the correlated evolution of flightlessness and relative brain size in birds

Abstract Secondary flightlessness has evolved independently many times in birds. Morphological changes in the pectoral girdle and flight feathers and changes in body size have been associated with the evolution of flightlessness, and it has also been suggested that flightless birds have relatively s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Zoology
Main Authors: Iwaniuk, Andrew N., Nelson, John E., James, Helen F., Olson, Storrs L.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0952836904005308
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1017%2FS0952836904005308
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1017/S0952836904005308
https://zslpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1017/S0952836904005308
Description
Summary:Abstract Secondary flightlessness has evolved independently many times in birds. Morphological changes in the pectoral girdle and flight feathers and changes in body size have been associated with the evolution of flightlessness, and it has also been suggested that flightless birds have relatively small brains. We therefore tested whether flightlessness is related to changes in relative brain size. Relative brain size was compared between volant and flightless species using both conventional statistics and modern comparative methods within nine taxonomic groups. No significant difference was found between flightless and volant species in six of these groups, regardless of whether body mass or tibiotarsal measurements were used as estimates of body size. Species with relatively smaller brains compared with their volant relatives were the great auk Pinguinus impennis , the kakapo Strigops habroptilus and some species of penguin. Thus, we found no evidence of a general correlation between the evolution of secondary flightlessness and the evolution of relatively small brains in birds. This suggests that neural requirements are not significantly different between flightless and volant species, although our methods may have overlooked subtle neurological changes that do not result in markedly different endocranial volumes.