Managing wolves in the Yellowstone area: Balancing goals across jurisdictional boundaries

• Published in: Wildlife Society Bulletin
• Main Authors: Smith, Douglas W., White, P. J., Stahler, Daniel R., Wydeven, Adrian, Hallac, David E.
• Other Authors: The Perkin-Protho Foundation, The Tapeats Foundation
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2016
• Subjects: Canis lupus; gray wolf
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wsb.677; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fwsb.677; http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1002/wsb.677/fullpdf

ABSTRACT Gray wolf ( Canis lupus ) restoration in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem began in 1995 with a small founder population in Yellowstone National Park, USA, which increased and contributed to a fully restored population in the northern Rocky Mountains by 2003. Upon removal as a federally listed, threatened species, wolf management outside the park was conveyed to Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming (USA) during 2009–2012; though wolves were relisted in Wyoming in 2014. Subsequent harvests elicited substantial negative reactions from wolf advocates when wolves that lived primarily in the park moved into surrounding states and were lawfully harvested. Conversely, many game managers and hunters advocated for larger harvests of wolves, including those in the park. These divergent viewpoints merit consideration when developing management plans for wolves that move between preserves and areas where hunting is permitted. We describe the history of wolf restoration and hunting in the ecosystem, contrast National Park Service and state management objectives, and characterize the risk to wolves living primarily in the park from hunting in surrounding areas. We recommend a framework for trans‐boundary wolf management that considers population, social structure, and ecosystem objectives on public lands, potential influences of harvests on population growth, depredation risks to livestock, and opportunities for hunters and wildlife watching. We also consider human attitudes and social norms, thereby allowing for differences in values in our prescriptions. This framework has been implemented in a key hunting area along the northern boundary of Yellowstone and is broadly applicable elsewhere for the management of wildlife species held in the public trust. © 2016 The Wildlife Society.