Mad cow policy and management of grizzly bear incidents
Abstract Protection of humans and livestock from disease has been used to justify many aggressive and costly wildlife control programs. Recent regulatory changes on livestock carcass disposal aimed at controlling the spread of bovine spongiform encephalopathy in Canada have led to substantial increa...
Published in: | Wildlife Society Bulletin |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wsb.167 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fwsb.167 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/wsb.167 |
id |
crwiley:10.1002/wsb.167 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
crwiley:10.1002/wsb.167 2024-06-02T08:15:36+00:00 Mad cow policy and management of grizzly bear incidents Northrup, Joseph M. Boyce, Mark S. 2012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wsb.167 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fwsb.167 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/wsb.167 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Wildlife Society Bulletin volume 36, issue 3, page 499-505 ISSN 1938-5463 journal-article 2012 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.167 2024-05-03T11:10:40Z Abstract Protection of humans and livestock from disease has been used to justify many aggressive and costly wildlife control programs. Recent regulatory changes on livestock carcass disposal aimed at controlling the spread of bovine spongiform encephalopathy in Canada have led to substantial increases in exposed livestock carcass dumps. Such “boneyards” are known to attract grizzly bears ( Ursus arctos ), which leads to human–bear conflict. We compiled data on human–grizzly bear interactions in an agricultural landscape in southwestern Alberta over a 12‐year time period (1999–2010) overlapping regulatory changes. Boneyards increased markedly after regulations were enacted and grizzly bear incidents increased correspondingly, particularly those related to dead livestock. The high rate of conflict results in frequent management captures, relocations, and translocations that create a likely population sink. Although work is underway to reduce human–bear interactions, revisions are needed to recent regulatory changes, such that they take wildlife into account. When combined with programs aimed at ensuring proper storage of attractants, we believe that such policy reforms will make it possible for humans to coexist with grizzly bears in southwestern Alberta. © 2012 The Wildlife Society. Article in Journal/Newspaper Ursus arctos Wiley Online Library Canada Wildlife Society Bulletin 36 3 499 505 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Wiley Online Library |
op_collection_id |
crwiley |
language |
English |
description |
Abstract Protection of humans and livestock from disease has been used to justify many aggressive and costly wildlife control programs. Recent regulatory changes on livestock carcass disposal aimed at controlling the spread of bovine spongiform encephalopathy in Canada have led to substantial increases in exposed livestock carcass dumps. Such “boneyards” are known to attract grizzly bears ( Ursus arctos ), which leads to human–bear conflict. We compiled data on human–grizzly bear interactions in an agricultural landscape in southwestern Alberta over a 12‐year time period (1999–2010) overlapping regulatory changes. Boneyards increased markedly after regulations were enacted and grizzly bear incidents increased correspondingly, particularly those related to dead livestock. The high rate of conflict results in frequent management captures, relocations, and translocations that create a likely population sink. Although work is underway to reduce human–bear interactions, revisions are needed to recent regulatory changes, such that they take wildlife into account. When combined with programs aimed at ensuring proper storage of attractants, we believe that such policy reforms will make it possible for humans to coexist with grizzly bears in southwestern Alberta. © 2012 The Wildlife Society. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Northrup, Joseph M. Boyce, Mark S. |
spellingShingle |
Northrup, Joseph M. Boyce, Mark S. Mad cow policy and management of grizzly bear incidents |
author_facet |
Northrup, Joseph M. Boyce, Mark S. |
author_sort |
Northrup, Joseph M. |
title |
Mad cow policy and management of grizzly bear incidents |
title_short |
Mad cow policy and management of grizzly bear incidents |
title_full |
Mad cow policy and management of grizzly bear incidents |
title_fullStr |
Mad cow policy and management of grizzly bear incidents |
title_full_unstemmed |
Mad cow policy and management of grizzly bear incidents |
title_sort |
mad cow policy and management of grizzly bear incidents |
publisher |
Wiley |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wsb.167 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fwsb.167 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/wsb.167 |
geographic |
Canada |
geographic_facet |
Canada |
genre |
Ursus arctos |
genre_facet |
Ursus arctos |
op_source |
Wildlife Society Bulletin volume 36, issue 3, page 499-505 ISSN 1938-5463 |
op_rights |
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.167 |
container_title |
Wildlife Society Bulletin |
container_volume |
36 |
container_issue |
3 |
container_start_page |
499 |
op_container_end_page |
505 |
_version_ |
1800739839079874560 |