Growth, Condition and Survival of Three Forage Fish Species Exposed to Two Different Experimental Hydropeaking Regimes in a Regulated River

• Published in: River Research and Applications
• Main Authors: Kelly, B., Smokorowski, K. E., Power, M.
• Other Authors: Fisheries and Oceans Canada-Center of expertise on Hydropower Impacts on Fish and Fish Habitat (DFO CHIF), Natural Resources Solutions Inc.
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2016
• Subjects: Cottus cognatus; Slimy sculpin
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rra.3070; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Frra.3070; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/rra.3070

Abstract Hydroelectric dam operation can alter discharge and temperature patterns, impacting fish populations downstream. Previous investigations into the effects of river regulation on fish have focused on a single species within a river, yet different results among studies suggest the potential for species‐specific impacts. Here, we compare the impacts of two different hydropeaking regimes relative to a naturally flowing river on three ecologically important members of the forage fish community: longnose dace ( Rhinichthys cataractae ), slimy sculpin ( Cottus cognatus ) and trout‐perch ( Percopsis omiscomaycus ). Annual growth, estimated from otolith back‐calculations, was higher for each of the species in the regulated river relative to the naturally flowing river but did not differ between hydropeaking regimes. Condition was assessed using weight–length relationships and differed between rivers for each species, and between hydropeaking regimes for longnose dace and slimy sculpin. Survival of longnose dace and slimy sculpin was lower in the regulated river relative to the naturally flowing river, but comparable between rivers for trout‐perch. Annual growth was significantly related to mean summer discharge in the regulated river and to mean summer water temperature in the naturally flowing river for each species, and significantly different slopes among species indicate species‐specific responses to discharge and temperature alterations. This study demonstrates different biological responses among fish species within rivers to regulation in general, as well as to specific hydropeaking regimes. Future studies should focus on multiple species and multiple indicators of fish health to more fully characterize the impacts of river regulation on downstream fish communities. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.