Tests of size and growth effects on Arctic charr ( Salvelinus alpinus) otolith δ 18 O and δ 13 C values

• Published in: Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
• Main Authors: Burbank, J., Kelly, B., Nilsson, J., Power, M.
• Other Authors: Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2018
• Subjects: Arctic; Arctic charr; Salvelinus alpinus
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rcm.8198; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Frcm.8198; http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1002/rcm.8198/fullpdf

Rationale Otolith δ 18 O and δ 13 C values have been used extensively to reconstruct thermal and diet histories. Researchers have suggested that individual growth rate and size may have an effect on otolith isotope ratios and subsequently confound otolith‐based thermal and diet reconstructions. As few explicit tests of the effect on fish in freshwater environments exist, here we determine experimentally the potential for related growth rate and size effects on otolith δ 18 O and δ 13 C values. Methods Fifty Arctic charr were raised in identical conditions for two years after which their otoliths were removed and analyzed for their δ 18 O and δ 13 C values. The potential effects of final length and the Thermal Growth Coefficient (TGC) on otolith isotope ratios were tested using correlation and regression analysis to determine if significant effects were present and to quantify effects when present. Results The analyses indicated that TGC and size had significant and similar positive non‐linear relationships with δ 13 C values and explained 35% and 42% of the variability, respectively. Conversely, both TGC and size were found to have no significant correlation with otolith δ 18 O values. There was no significant correlation between δ 18 O and δ 13 C values. Conclusions The investigation indicated the presence of linked growth rate and size effects on otolith δ 13 C values, the nature of which requires further study. Otolith δ 18 O values were unaffected by individual growth rate and size, confirming the applicability of these values to thermal reconstructions of fish habitat.