Sensitivity of ozone and temperature to vertical resolution in a gcm with coupled stratospheric chemistry

Abstract Results are presented from a general‐circulation model with comprehensive stratospheric photochemistry and which includes the coupling between radiative heating and simulated ozone. Each model integration covers the 60‐day period beginning 15 January during which episodes of polar stratosph...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Main Authors: Austin, John, Butchart, Neal, Swinbank, Richard
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 1997
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712354113
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fqj.49712354113
https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/qj.49712354113
id crwiley:10.1002/qj.49712354113
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1002/qj.49712354113 2024-06-02T08:02:43+00:00 Sensitivity of ozone and temperature to vertical resolution in a gcm with coupled stratospheric chemistry Austin, John Butchart, Neal Swinbank, Richard 1997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712354113 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fqj.49712354113 https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/qj.49712354113 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society volume 123, issue 541, page 1405-1431 ISSN 0035-9009 1477-870X journal-article 1997 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712354113 2024-05-03T10:59:53Z Abstract Results are presented from a general‐circulation model with comprehensive stratospheric photochemistry and which includes the coupling between radiative heating and simulated ozone. Each model integration covers the 60‐day period beginning 15 January during which episodes of polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs) are normally observed in the Arctic. Results from two versions of the model with different numbers of atmospheric levels near and above the tropopause are compared with observations. In the 19‐level model the ozone transport is poorly simulated and, in particular, there is a significant increase in the tropospheric column. In contrast, in the 49‐level model the simulated ozone distribution is in good general agreement with observations and reproduces well the steep vertical gradients in ozone mixing ratios in the tropical lower stratosphere, and the weak vertical gradients in the high‐latitude middle stratosphere. This version also maintains a virtually constant tropospheric ozone column. Since in the 49‐level model the ozone distribution is well simulated, including this ozone in the radiation calculation has only a moderate influence on the results. However, with the 19‐level model, it substantially increases the global stratospheric temperature error. Increasing the number of levels improves the simulation of stratospheric temperatures but the zonal‐mean temperatures in both versions of the model are generally lower than observed. Despite this, the modelled frequency of occurrences of PSCs is less than observed because of the underprediction of the zonally asymmetric component of the temperature distribution. the results suggest that if coupled chemistry‐climate simulations are to proceed, it is important to have both a high upper boundary and good vertical resolution in the lower stratosphere to ensure a realistic meridional circulation and a more accurate representation of ozone transport across the tropopause. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Wiley Online Library Arctic Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 123 541 1405 1431
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract Results are presented from a general‐circulation model with comprehensive stratospheric photochemistry and which includes the coupling between radiative heating and simulated ozone. Each model integration covers the 60‐day period beginning 15 January during which episodes of polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs) are normally observed in the Arctic. Results from two versions of the model with different numbers of atmospheric levels near and above the tropopause are compared with observations. In the 19‐level model the ozone transport is poorly simulated and, in particular, there is a significant increase in the tropospheric column. In contrast, in the 49‐level model the simulated ozone distribution is in good general agreement with observations and reproduces well the steep vertical gradients in ozone mixing ratios in the tropical lower stratosphere, and the weak vertical gradients in the high‐latitude middle stratosphere. This version also maintains a virtually constant tropospheric ozone column. Since in the 49‐level model the ozone distribution is well simulated, including this ozone in the radiation calculation has only a moderate influence on the results. However, with the 19‐level model, it substantially increases the global stratospheric temperature error. Increasing the number of levels improves the simulation of stratospheric temperatures but the zonal‐mean temperatures in both versions of the model are generally lower than observed. Despite this, the modelled frequency of occurrences of PSCs is less than observed because of the underprediction of the zonally asymmetric component of the temperature distribution. the results suggest that if coupled chemistry‐climate simulations are to proceed, it is important to have both a high upper boundary and good vertical resolution in the lower stratosphere to ensure a realistic meridional circulation and a more accurate representation of ozone transport across the tropopause.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Austin, John
Butchart, Neal
Swinbank, Richard
spellingShingle Austin, John
Butchart, Neal
Swinbank, Richard
Sensitivity of ozone and temperature to vertical resolution in a gcm with coupled stratospheric chemistry
author_facet Austin, John
Butchart, Neal
Swinbank, Richard
author_sort Austin, John
title Sensitivity of ozone and temperature to vertical resolution in a gcm with coupled stratospheric chemistry
title_short Sensitivity of ozone and temperature to vertical resolution in a gcm with coupled stratospheric chemistry
title_full Sensitivity of ozone and temperature to vertical resolution in a gcm with coupled stratospheric chemistry
title_fullStr Sensitivity of ozone and temperature to vertical resolution in a gcm with coupled stratospheric chemistry
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity of ozone and temperature to vertical resolution in a gcm with coupled stratospheric chemistry
title_sort sensitivity of ozone and temperature to vertical resolution in a gcm with coupled stratospheric chemistry
publisher Wiley
publishDate 1997
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712354113
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fqj.49712354113
https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/qj.49712354113
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
volume 123, issue 541, page 1405-1431
ISSN 0035-9009 1477-870X
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712354113
container_title Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
container_volume 123
container_issue 541
container_start_page 1405
op_container_end_page 1431
_version_ 1800747190991192064