On the reproducibility of the September 2002 vortex splitting event in the Antarctic stratosphere achieved without satellite observations

To highlight the impact of satellite measurements, a comparison between the Japanese 55‐year reanalysis ( JRA ‐55) and its equivalent without the assimilation of satellite observations ( JRA‐55C C stands for ‘conventional’ observations) was conducted. As an illustrative example of the detectability...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Main Authors: Noguchi, Shunsuke, Kobayashi, Chiaki
Other Authors: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/qj.3193
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fqj.3193
https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/qj.3193
id crwiley:10.1002/qj.3193
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1002/qj.3193 2024-06-02T07:58:06+00:00 On the reproducibility of the September 2002 vortex splitting event in the Antarctic stratosphere achieved without satellite observations Noguchi, Shunsuke Kobayashi, Chiaki Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/qj.3193 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fqj.3193 https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/qj.3193 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society volume 144, issue 710, page 184-194 ISSN 0035-9009 1477-870X journal-article 2017 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3193 2024-05-03T10:34:06Z To highlight the impact of satellite measurements, a comparison between the Japanese 55‐year reanalysis ( JRA ‐55) and its equivalent without the assimilation of satellite observations ( JRA‐55C C stands for ‘conventional’ observations) was conducted. As an illustrative example of the detectability problem of extreme events, we report on the reproducibility of a stratospheric sudden warming ( SSW ) event that occurred in late September 2002; this event represents the first observed unique vortex splitting event in the Antarctic stratosphere. Through the data assimilation system of JRA ‐55, the initial tendency of this warming event and the following recovery process were well captured even when no satellite observations were used. However, the warming in JRA‐55C does not satisfy the criteria for a major SSW event besides the lack of splitting behaviour in the polar vortex. A prominent difference between JRA ‐55 and JRA‐55C during the SSW event, which was characterized by the sudden appearance of a nearly barotropic structure from the upper stratosphere to the troposphere, was found over the Western Hemisphere reflecting the geographic distribution of observational sites. Moreover, several differences in the precursory state of the polar vortex and the observational anchoring effect are consistent with the proposal that this SSW was caused by the catastrophic breakdown of a highly deformed polar vortex as suggested by some recent works. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Wiley Online Library Antarctic The Antarctic Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 144 710 184 194
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description To highlight the impact of satellite measurements, a comparison between the Japanese 55‐year reanalysis ( JRA ‐55) and its equivalent without the assimilation of satellite observations ( JRA‐55C C stands for ‘conventional’ observations) was conducted. As an illustrative example of the detectability problem of extreme events, we report on the reproducibility of a stratospheric sudden warming ( SSW ) event that occurred in late September 2002; this event represents the first observed unique vortex splitting event in the Antarctic stratosphere. Through the data assimilation system of JRA ‐55, the initial tendency of this warming event and the following recovery process were well captured even when no satellite observations were used. However, the warming in JRA‐55C does not satisfy the criteria for a major SSW event besides the lack of splitting behaviour in the polar vortex. A prominent difference between JRA ‐55 and JRA‐55C during the SSW event, which was characterized by the sudden appearance of a nearly barotropic structure from the upper stratosphere to the troposphere, was found over the Western Hemisphere reflecting the geographic distribution of observational sites. Moreover, several differences in the precursory state of the polar vortex and the observational anchoring effect are consistent with the proposal that this SSW was caused by the catastrophic breakdown of a highly deformed polar vortex as suggested by some recent works.
author2 Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Noguchi, Shunsuke
Kobayashi, Chiaki
spellingShingle Noguchi, Shunsuke
Kobayashi, Chiaki
On the reproducibility of the September 2002 vortex splitting event in the Antarctic stratosphere achieved without satellite observations
author_facet Noguchi, Shunsuke
Kobayashi, Chiaki
author_sort Noguchi, Shunsuke
title On the reproducibility of the September 2002 vortex splitting event in the Antarctic stratosphere achieved without satellite observations
title_short On the reproducibility of the September 2002 vortex splitting event in the Antarctic stratosphere achieved without satellite observations
title_full On the reproducibility of the September 2002 vortex splitting event in the Antarctic stratosphere achieved without satellite observations
title_fullStr On the reproducibility of the September 2002 vortex splitting event in the Antarctic stratosphere achieved without satellite observations
title_full_unstemmed On the reproducibility of the September 2002 vortex splitting event in the Antarctic stratosphere achieved without satellite observations
title_sort on the reproducibility of the september 2002 vortex splitting event in the antarctic stratosphere achieved without satellite observations
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2017
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/qj.3193
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fqj.3193
https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/qj.3193
geographic Antarctic
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
op_source Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
volume 144, issue 710, page 184-194
ISSN 0035-9009 1477-870X
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3193
container_title Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
container_volume 144
container_issue 710
container_start_page 184
op_container_end_page 194
_version_ 1800741366164094976