Prioritization of patients for surgery in Canada: The case of hip and knee replacement surgeries in Newfoundland

Abstract Background Single‐entry models (SEM) improve wait times for hip and knee replacement, but little is known whether prioritization implemented in SEM can help meet the benchmarks for consolation/surgery. This study aimed to determine the impact of prioritization on receiving consultation and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Public Health Challenges
Main Authors: Vo, Anh Thu, Yi, Yanqing, Mathews, Maria, Valcour, James, Alexander, Michelle, Billard, Marcel
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/puh2.104
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/puh2.104
id crwiley:10.1002/puh2.104
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1002/puh2.104 2024-06-02T08:10:46+00:00 Prioritization of patients for surgery in Canada: The case of hip and knee replacement surgeries in Newfoundland Vo, Anh Thu Yi, Yanqing Mathews, Maria Valcour, James Alexander, Michelle Billard, Marcel 2023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/puh2.104 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/puh2.104 en eng Wiley http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Public Health Challenges volume 2, issue 3 ISSN 2769-2450 2769-2450 journal-article 2023 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1002/puh2.104 2024-05-03T12:05:01Z Abstract Background Single‐entry models (SEM) improve wait times for hip and knee replacement, but little is known whether prioritization implemented in SEM can help meet the benchmarks for consolation/surgery. This study aimed to determine the impact of prioritization on receiving consultation and surgery within the benchmarks. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study for which two administration databases were linked. Logistic regression was used to investigate the impact of prioritization on receiving consultations and surgery within the benchmarks of 90 and 182 days, respectively, adjusting for patients’ characteristics and preference for surgeon. Results 1,967 patients were included in this study. The odds ratios of having consultation within 90 days for hip replacement patients in priorities 1 and 2 (high priority) were 57.24 (CI: 23.16–141.47) and 14.63 (CI: 6.44–33.25), respectively, compared with those in priority 3. For knee replacement, patients with higher priority were more likely to have consultation within 90 days. Although priority levels were not related to having surgery within 182 days for knee replacement, hip replacement patients with priority 1 (CI: 0.2–0.75) and 2 (CI: 0.16–0.54) were less likely to have surgery within 182 days, compared with those with priority 3. Conclusion Patients with high priority levels were more likely to have consultation within 90 days for hip and knee replacements. SEM may not help have surgery within 182 days. Prioritization has no impact on receiving surgery within 182 days for knee replacement, but hip replacement patients with high priority were less likely to have surgery within 182 days. Article in Journal/Newspaper Newfoundland Wiley Online Library Canada Public Health Challenges 2 3
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract Background Single‐entry models (SEM) improve wait times for hip and knee replacement, but little is known whether prioritization implemented in SEM can help meet the benchmarks for consolation/surgery. This study aimed to determine the impact of prioritization on receiving consultation and surgery within the benchmarks. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study for which two administration databases were linked. Logistic regression was used to investigate the impact of prioritization on receiving consultations and surgery within the benchmarks of 90 and 182 days, respectively, adjusting for patients’ characteristics and preference for surgeon. Results 1,967 patients were included in this study. The odds ratios of having consultation within 90 days for hip replacement patients in priorities 1 and 2 (high priority) were 57.24 (CI: 23.16–141.47) and 14.63 (CI: 6.44–33.25), respectively, compared with those in priority 3. For knee replacement, patients with higher priority were more likely to have consultation within 90 days. Although priority levels were not related to having surgery within 182 days for knee replacement, hip replacement patients with priority 1 (CI: 0.2–0.75) and 2 (CI: 0.16–0.54) were less likely to have surgery within 182 days, compared with those with priority 3. Conclusion Patients with high priority levels were more likely to have consultation within 90 days for hip and knee replacements. SEM may not help have surgery within 182 days. Prioritization has no impact on receiving surgery within 182 days for knee replacement, but hip replacement patients with high priority were less likely to have surgery within 182 days.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Vo, Anh Thu
Yi, Yanqing
Mathews, Maria
Valcour, James
Alexander, Michelle
Billard, Marcel
spellingShingle Vo, Anh Thu
Yi, Yanqing
Mathews, Maria
Valcour, James
Alexander, Michelle
Billard, Marcel
Prioritization of patients for surgery in Canada: The case of hip and knee replacement surgeries in Newfoundland
author_facet Vo, Anh Thu
Yi, Yanqing
Mathews, Maria
Valcour, James
Alexander, Michelle
Billard, Marcel
author_sort Vo, Anh Thu
title Prioritization of patients for surgery in Canada: The case of hip and knee replacement surgeries in Newfoundland
title_short Prioritization of patients for surgery in Canada: The case of hip and knee replacement surgeries in Newfoundland
title_full Prioritization of patients for surgery in Canada: The case of hip and knee replacement surgeries in Newfoundland
title_fullStr Prioritization of patients for surgery in Canada: The case of hip and knee replacement surgeries in Newfoundland
title_full_unstemmed Prioritization of patients for surgery in Canada: The case of hip and knee replacement surgeries in Newfoundland
title_sort prioritization of patients for surgery in canada: the case of hip and knee replacement surgeries in newfoundland
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2023
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/puh2.104
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/puh2.104
geographic Canada
geographic_facet Canada
genre Newfoundland
genre_facet Newfoundland
op_source Public Health Challenges
volume 2, issue 3
ISSN 2769-2450 2769-2450
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/puh2.104
container_title Public Health Challenges
container_volume 2
container_issue 3
_version_ 1800756678491111424