Comparison of baiting strategies in common vole management

Abstract BACKGROUND Worldwide, pest rodents can cause extensive damage to agriculture, forestry, food storage, and infrastructure and pose a risk to public health and livestock due to the spread of zoonotic pathogens. In Europe, the most common pest rodent species is the common vole ( Microtus arval...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pest Management Science
Main Authors: Jacoblinnert, Kyra, Goedecker, Caspar, Halle, Stefan, Schenke, Detlef, Imholt, Christian, Jacob, Jens
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.7967
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ps.7967
id crwiley:10.1002/ps.7967
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1002/ps.7967 2024-09-15T18:02:47+00:00 Comparison of baiting strategies in common vole management Jacoblinnert, Kyra Goedecker, Caspar Halle, Stefan Schenke, Detlef Imholt, Christian Jacob, Jens 2024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.7967 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ps.7967 en eng Wiley http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Pest Management Science ISSN 1526-498X 1526-4998 journal-article 2024 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.7967 2024-08-15T04:18:14Z Abstract BACKGROUND Worldwide, pest rodents can cause extensive damage to agriculture, forestry, food storage, and infrastructure and pose a risk to public health and livestock due to the spread of zoonotic pathogens. In Europe, the most common pest rodent species is the common vole ( Microtus arvalis ). Management during periodic outbreaks largely relies on rodenticidal bait with zinc phosphide. Efficient baiting with rodenticides or possibly anti‐fertility products in the future require baiting methods that allow a sufficient proportion of the population to consume an effective dose of bait. We used a bait with the quantitative marker ethyl‐iophenoxic acid (Et‐IPA) to evaluate baiting strategies in enclosure experiments. This wheat‐based bait with Et‐IPA was placed in bait boxes or directly into the tunnel system entrances in different seasons and common vole abundances. Voles were live‐trapped, individually marked and blood samples were collected to relate Et‐IPA blood residues to bait uptake. RESULTS The percentage of animals consuming bait was not heavily affected by the baiting strategy but voles had higher Et‐IPA blood residues if tunnel baiting was used in autumn and if bait boxes were used in winter. Non‐reproductive as well as lighter animals tended to have higher Et‐IPA blood residues than reproductive individuals, whereas sex had no effect. Population density had a negative effect on the probability of residues present as well as on Et‐IPA blood concentration. CONCLUSION The results of this study might help to improve baiting techniques to manage overabundant rodent pest species regardless of the compounds to be delivered. © 2024 Julius Kühn‐Institut. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. Article in Journal/Newspaper Common vole Microtus arvalis Wiley Online Library Pest Management Science
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract BACKGROUND Worldwide, pest rodents can cause extensive damage to agriculture, forestry, food storage, and infrastructure and pose a risk to public health and livestock due to the spread of zoonotic pathogens. In Europe, the most common pest rodent species is the common vole ( Microtus arvalis ). Management during periodic outbreaks largely relies on rodenticidal bait with zinc phosphide. Efficient baiting with rodenticides or possibly anti‐fertility products in the future require baiting methods that allow a sufficient proportion of the population to consume an effective dose of bait. We used a bait with the quantitative marker ethyl‐iophenoxic acid (Et‐IPA) to evaluate baiting strategies in enclosure experiments. This wheat‐based bait with Et‐IPA was placed in bait boxes or directly into the tunnel system entrances in different seasons and common vole abundances. Voles were live‐trapped, individually marked and blood samples were collected to relate Et‐IPA blood residues to bait uptake. RESULTS The percentage of animals consuming bait was not heavily affected by the baiting strategy but voles had higher Et‐IPA blood residues if tunnel baiting was used in autumn and if bait boxes were used in winter. Non‐reproductive as well as lighter animals tended to have higher Et‐IPA blood residues than reproductive individuals, whereas sex had no effect. Population density had a negative effect on the probability of residues present as well as on Et‐IPA blood concentration. CONCLUSION The results of this study might help to improve baiting techniques to manage overabundant rodent pest species regardless of the compounds to be delivered. © 2024 Julius Kühn‐Institut. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Jacoblinnert, Kyra
Goedecker, Caspar
Halle, Stefan
Schenke, Detlef
Imholt, Christian
Jacob, Jens
spellingShingle Jacoblinnert, Kyra
Goedecker, Caspar
Halle, Stefan
Schenke, Detlef
Imholt, Christian
Jacob, Jens
Comparison of baiting strategies in common vole management
author_facet Jacoblinnert, Kyra
Goedecker, Caspar
Halle, Stefan
Schenke, Detlef
Imholt, Christian
Jacob, Jens
author_sort Jacoblinnert, Kyra
title Comparison of baiting strategies in common vole management
title_short Comparison of baiting strategies in common vole management
title_full Comparison of baiting strategies in common vole management
title_fullStr Comparison of baiting strategies in common vole management
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of baiting strategies in common vole management
title_sort comparison of baiting strategies in common vole management
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2024
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.7967
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ps.7967
genre Common vole
Microtus arvalis
genre_facet Common vole
Microtus arvalis
op_source Pest Management Science
ISSN 1526-498X 1526-4998
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.7967
container_title Pest Management Science
_version_ 1810440205036945408