Periglacial distribution modelling with a boosting method
Abstract We assessed the applicability of a boosting method in periglacial distribution modelling using empirically derived data on cryoturbation, sporadic permafrost and sorted solifluction from an area of 600 km 2 in sub‐Arctic Finland. The main aims were: (1) to compare the predictive ability of...
Published in: | Permafrost and Periglacial Processes |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2008
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.629 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fppp.629 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ppp.629 |
_version_ | 1821818966085992448 |
---|---|
author | Hjort, Jan Marmion, Mathieu |
author2 | Academy of Finland |
author_facet | Hjort, Jan Marmion, Mathieu |
author_sort | Hjort, Jan |
collection | Wiley Online Library |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 15 |
container_title | Permafrost and Periglacial Processes |
container_volume | 20 |
description | Abstract We assessed the applicability of a boosting method in periglacial distribution modelling using empirically derived data on cryoturbation, sporadic permafrost and sorted solifluction from an area of 600 km 2 in sub‐Arctic Finland. The main aims were: (1) to compare the predictive ability of the generalised boosting method used with more common parametric techniques (generalised linear model) and machine‐learning methods (artificial neural networks) and (2) to assess the tenability of the explanatory variables highlighted by the generalised boosting method. The results showed the robustness of the boosting method in predicting the distribution of periglacial phenomena in the sub‐Arctic landscape. Furthermore, the environmental factors selected by the boosting method coincided well with the expected controls of the phenomena. The strengths of the generalised boosting method lie in its high predictive ability, flexibility in capturing complex process‐environment relationships and realistic model outcomes. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
format | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
genre | Arctic permafrost Permafrost and Periglacial Processes |
genre_facet | Arctic permafrost Permafrost and Periglacial Processes |
geographic | Arctic |
geographic_facet | Arctic |
id | crwiley:10.1002/ppp.629 |
institution | Open Polar |
language | English |
op_collection_id | crwiley |
op_container_end_page | 25 |
op_doi | https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.629 |
op_rights | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
op_source | Permafrost and Periglacial Processes volume 20, issue 1, page 15-25 ISSN 1045-6740 1099-1530 |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | openpolar |
spelling | crwiley:10.1002/ppp.629 2025-01-16T20:24:20+00:00 Periglacial distribution modelling with a boosting method Hjort, Jan Marmion, Mathieu Academy of Finland 2008 https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.629 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fppp.629 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ppp.629 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Permafrost and Periglacial Processes volume 20, issue 1, page 15-25 ISSN 1045-6740 1099-1530 journal-article 2008 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.629 2024-12-11T00:26:22Z Abstract We assessed the applicability of a boosting method in periglacial distribution modelling using empirically derived data on cryoturbation, sporadic permafrost and sorted solifluction from an area of 600 km 2 in sub‐Arctic Finland. The main aims were: (1) to compare the predictive ability of the generalised boosting method used with more common parametric techniques (generalised linear model) and machine‐learning methods (artificial neural networks) and (2) to assess the tenability of the explanatory variables highlighted by the generalised boosting method. The results showed the robustness of the boosting method in predicting the distribution of periglacial phenomena in the sub‐Arctic landscape. Furthermore, the environmental factors selected by the boosting method coincided well with the expected controls of the phenomena. The strengths of the generalised boosting method lie in its high predictive ability, flexibility in capturing complex process‐environment relationships and realistic model outcomes. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic permafrost Permafrost and Periglacial Processes Wiley Online Library Arctic Permafrost and Periglacial Processes 20 1 15 25 |
spellingShingle | Hjort, Jan Marmion, Mathieu Periglacial distribution modelling with a boosting method |
title | Periglacial distribution modelling with a boosting method |
title_full | Periglacial distribution modelling with a boosting method |
title_fullStr | Periglacial distribution modelling with a boosting method |
title_full_unstemmed | Periglacial distribution modelling with a boosting method |
title_short | Periglacial distribution modelling with a boosting method |
title_sort | periglacial distribution modelling with a boosting method |
url | https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.629 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fppp.629 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ppp.629 |