The effect of transient conditions on an equilibrium permafrost‐climate model

Abstract Equilibrium permafrost models assume a stationary temperature and snow‐cover climate. With a variable or changing climate, short‐term energy imbalances between the active layer and permafrost result in transient departures from the equilibrium condition. This study examines the effects of s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Permafrost and Periglacial Processes
Main Author: Riseborough, Dan
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppp.579
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fppp.579
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ppp.579
id crwiley:10.1002/ppp.579
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1002/ppp.579 2024-09-15T18:29:17+00:00 The effect of transient conditions on an equilibrium permafrost‐climate model Riseborough, Dan 2007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppp.579 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fppp.579 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ppp.579 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Permafrost and Periglacial Processes volume 18, issue 1, page 21-32 ISSN 1045-6740 1099-1530 journal-article 2007 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.579 2024-09-03T04:26:39Z Abstract Equilibrium permafrost models assume a stationary temperature and snow‐cover climate. With a variable or changing climate, short‐term energy imbalances between the active layer and permafrost result in transient departures from the equilibrium condition. This study examines the effects of such variability on an equilibrium permafrost‐climate model, the temperature at the top of permafrost (TTOP) model. Comparisons between numerical results and temperatures predicted by the TTOP‐model suggest that stationary inter‐annual variability introduces an error in the top‐of‐permafrost temperature obtained with the equilibrium model that is higher where permafrost temperature is close to 0°C, although multi‐year averaging reduces the error to 0.1°C or less. In the presence of a warming trend, the equilibrium model prediction tracked the changing top‐of‐permafrost temperature until permafrost temperatures reached 0°C, after which the equilibrium model produced significant errors. Errors up to 1°C were due to the temperature gradient through the developing talik, and depended on the warming rate, and the thickness of the talik. For all warming rates, the error was largest when the permafrost table was about 4 m below the surface, with the error declining as the permafrost table fell. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Article in Journal/Newspaper permafrost Permafrost and Periglacial Processes Talik Wiley Online Library Permafrost and Periglacial Processes 18 1 21 32
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract Equilibrium permafrost models assume a stationary temperature and snow‐cover climate. With a variable or changing climate, short‐term energy imbalances between the active layer and permafrost result in transient departures from the equilibrium condition. This study examines the effects of such variability on an equilibrium permafrost‐climate model, the temperature at the top of permafrost (TTOP) model. Comparisons between numerical results and temperatures predicted by the TTOP‐model suggest that stationary inter‐annual variability introduces an error in the top‐of‐permafrost temperature obtained with the equilibrium model that is higher where permafrost temperature is close to 0°C, although multi‐year averaging reduces the error to 0.1°C or less. In the presence of a warming trend, the equilibrium model prediction tracked the changing top‐of‐permafrost temperature until permafrost temperatures reached 0°C, after which the equilibrium model produced significant errors. Errors up to 1°C were due to the temperature gradient through the developing talik, and depended on the warming rate, and the thickness of the talik. For all warming rates, the error was largest when the permafrost table was about 4 m below the surface, with the error declining as the permafrost table fell. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Riseborough, Dan
spellingShingle Riseborough, Dan
The effect of transient conditions on an equilibrium permafrost‐climate model
author_facet Riseborough, Dan
author_sort Riseborough, Dan
title The effect of transient conditions on an equilibrium permafrost‐climate model
title_short The effect of transient conditions on an equilibrium permafrost‐climate model
title_full The effect of transient conditions on an equilibrium permafrost‐climate model
title_fullStr The effect of transient conditions on an equilibrium permafrost‐climate model
title_full_unstemmed The effect of transient conditions on an equilibrium permafrost‐climate model
title_sort effect of transient conditions on an equilibrium permafrost‐climate model
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2007
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppp.579
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fppp.579
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ppp.579
genre permafrost
Permafrost and Periglacial Processes
Talik
genre_facet permafrost
Permafrost and Periglacial Processes
Talik
op_source Permafrost and Periglacial Processes
volume 18, issue 1, page 21-32
ISSN 1045-6740 1099-1530
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.579
container_title Permafrost and Periglacial Processes
container_volume 18
container_issue 1
container_start_page 21
op_container_end_page 32
_version_ 1810470702199865344