Microgelivation versus macrogelivation: towards bridging the gap between laboratory and field frost weathering

Abstract The application of laboratory criteria for frost weathering to field problems needs caution, because a number of discrepancies lie between the laboratory and field conditions. This paper reviews thresholds for microgelivation of soft, intact rocks and macrogelivation of hard, jointed rocks,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Permafrost and Periglacial Processes
Main Author: Matsuoka, Norikazu
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2001
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppp.393
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fppp.393
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ppp.393
id crwiley:10.1002/ppp.393
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1002/ppp.393 2024-05-19T07:47:16+00:00 Microgelivation versus macrogelivation: towards bridging the gap between laboratory and field frost weathering Matsuoka, Norikazu 2001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppp.393 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fppp.393 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ppp.393 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Permafrost and Periglacial Processes volume 12, issue 3, page 299-313 ISSN 1045-6740 1099-1530 Earth-Surface Processes journal-article 2001 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.393 2024-04-22T07:35:56Z Abstract The application of laboratory criteria for frost weathering to field problems needs caution, because a number of discrepancies lie between the laboratory and field conditions. This paper reviews thresholds for microgelivation of soft, intact rocks and macrogelivation of hard, jointed rocks, aiming at proposing better criteria in accordance with field conditions. The temperature at which ice segregation induces microgelivation varies significantly with lithology, ranging from about −1 °C in high porosity rocks to below −4 °C in low porosity rocks. Microgelivation can occur in initially unsaturated rocks when slow (seasonal) freezing drives prolonged water migration from surrounding rock or an external moisture source, while the occurrence requires a high degree of saturation (>80%) or a nearby moisture source when a rock undergoes rapid (diurnal) freezing. Rocks with a high internal surface area and low tensile strength favour microgelivation. These criteria are invalid for macrogelivation that tends to take place just below 0 °C in water‐filled joints. In addition, because the depth reached by cracking varies with the type of freeze‐thaw action, the analysis of thermal regimes should be based on data at the depth of actual cracking. Future targets for macrogelivation studies include the formation of new cracks in hard, intact rocks, as indicated by in situ shattering of clasts or bedrock typically observed in optimal moisture environments. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Article in Journal/Newspaper Permafrost and Periglacial Processes Wiley Online Library Permafrost and Periglacial Processes 12 3 299 313
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
topic Earth-Surface Processes
spellingShingle Earth-Surface Processes
Matsuoka, Norikazu
Microgelivation versus macrogelivation: towards bridging the gap between laboratory and field frost weathering
topic_facet Earth-Surface Processes
description Abstract The application of laboratory criteria for frost weathering to field problems needs caution, because a number of discrepancies lie between the laboratory and field conditions. This paper reviews thresholds for microgelivation of soft, intact rocks and macrogelivation of hard, jointed rocks, aiming at proposing better criteria in accordance with field conditions. The temperature at which ice segregation induces microgelivation varies significantly with lithology, ranging from about −1 °C in high porosity rocks to below −4 °C in low porosity rocks. Microgelivation can occur in initially unsaturated rocks when slow (seasonal) freezing drives prolonged water migration from surrounding rock or an external moisture source, while the occurrence requires a high degree of saturation (>80%) or a nearby moisture source when a rock undergoes rapid (diurnal) freezing. Rocks with a high internal surface area and low tensile strength favour microgelivation. These criteria are invalid for macrogelivation that tends to take place just below 0 °C in water‐filled joints. In addition, because the depth reached by cracking varies with the type of freeze‐thaw action, the analysis of thermal regimes should be based on data at the depth of actual cracking. Future targets for macrogelivation studies include the formation of new cracks in hard, intact rocks, as indicated by in situ shattering of clasts or bedrock typically observed in optimal moisture environments. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Matsuoka, Norikazu
author_facet Matsuoka, Norikazu
author_sort Matsuoka, Norikazu
title Microgelivation versus macrogelivation: towards bridging the gap between laboratory and field frost weathering
title_short Microgelivation versus macrogelivation: towards bridging the gap between laboratory and field frost weathering
title_full Microgelivation versus macrogelivation: towards bridging the gap between laboratory and field frost weathering
title_fullStr Microgelivation versus macrogelivation: towards bridging the gap between laboratory and field frost weathering
title_full_unstemmed Microgelivation versus macrogelivation: towards bridging the gap between laboratory and field frost weathering
title_sort microgelivation versus macrogelivation: towards bridging the gap between laboratory and field frost weathering
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2001
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppp.393
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fppp.393
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ppp.393
genre Permafrost and Periglacial Processes
genre_facet Permafrost and Periglacial Processes
op_source Permafrost and Periglacial Processes
volume 12, issue 3, page 299-313
ISSN 1045-6740 1099-1530
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.393
container_title Permafrost and Periglacial Processes
container_volume 12
container_issue 3
container_start_page 299
op_container_end_page 313
_version_ 1799487613154885632