Glaciological constraints on protalus rampart development

Abstract The growth of protalus ramparts is self‐limiting, as progressive thickening of a firn field will increase basal shear stress, encouraging creep of ice and basal sliding, and thus cause the transformation of stationary firn into a small glacier with consequent destruction or modification of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Permafrost and Periglacial Processes
Main Authors: Ballantyne, Colin K., Benn, Douglas I.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 1994
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppp.3430050304
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fppp.3430050304
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ppp.3430050304
id crwiley:10.1002/ppp.3430050304
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1002/ppp.3430050304 2024-09-15T18:30:16+00:00 Glaciological constraints on protalus rampart development Ballantyne, Colin K. Benn, Douglas I. 1994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppp.3430050304 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fppp.3430050304 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ppp.3430050304 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Permafrost and Periglacial Processes volume 5, issue 3, page 145-153 ISSN 1045-6740 1099-1530 journal-article 1994 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.3430050304 2024-07-25T04:22:08Z Abstract The growth of protalus ramparts is self‐limiting, as progressive thickening of a firn field will increase basal shear stress, encouraging creep of ice and basal sliding, and thus cause the transformation of stationary firn into a small glacier with consequent destruction or modification of the rampart. Modelling of the threshold conditions under which significant movement of the firn field begins indicates that the maximum distance between the rampart crest and the talus foot upslope cannot exceed c. 30–70 m, the limiting value being dependent on the gradient of the firn field. This finding implies that ridges or ramps of debris lying at greater distances from the talus foot cannot be [true] protalus ramparts formed by debris descending an essentially stationary firn field, and hence that many landforms previously described as protalus ramparts have been misinterpreted. Modelling of the limiting conditions for gravitational transport of debris suggests that clasts may continue to reach the front of a steep incipient glacier even after ice movement has been initiated, at least until the toe of the ice reaches a position 85–125 m from the talus foot. This implies the possible existence of [protalus moraines] whose form is influenced by moving ice, yet which continue to receive a supply of debris by direct gravitational transport across the ice surface. Article in Journal/Newspaper Permafrost and Periglacial Processes Wiley Online Library Permafrost and Periglacial Processes 5 3 145 153
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract The growth of protalus ramparts is self‐limiting, as progressive thickening of a firn field will increase basal shear stress, encouraging creep of ice and basal sliding, and thus cause the transformation of stationary firn into a small glacier with consequent destruction or modification of the rampart. Modelling of the threshold conditions under which significant movement of the firn field begins indicates that the maximum distance between the rampart crest and the talus foot upslope cannot exceed c. 30–70 m, the limiting value being dependent on the gradient of the firn field. This finding implies that ridges or ramps of debris lying at greater distances from the talus foot cannot be [true] protalus ramparts formed by debris descending an essentially stationary firn field, and hence that many landforms previously described as protalus ramparts have been misinterpreted. Modelling of the limiting conditions for gravitational transport of debris suggests that clasts may continue to reach the front of a steep incipient glacier even after ice movement has been initiated, at least until the toe of the ice reaches a position 85–125 m from the talus foot. This implies the possible existence of [protalus moraines] whose form is influenced by moving ice, yet which continue to receive a supply of debris by direct gravitational transport across the ice surface.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Ballantyne, Colin K.
Benn, Douglas I.
spellingShingle Ballantyne, Colin K.
Benn, Douglas I.
Glaciological constraints on protalus rampart development
author_facet Ballantyne, Colin K.
Benn, Douglas I.
author_sort Ballantyne, Colin K.
title Glaciological constraints on protalus rampart development
title_short Glaciological constraints on protalus rampart development
title_full Glaciological constraints on protalus rampart development
title_fullStr Glaciological constraints on protalus rampart development
title_full_unstemmed Glaciological constraints on protalus rampart development
title_sort glaciological constraints on protalus rampart development
publisher Wiley
publishDate 1994
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppp.3430050304
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fppp.3430050304
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ppp.3430050304
genre Permafrost and Periglacial Processes
genre_facet Permafrost and Periglacial Processes
op_source Permafrost and Periglacial Processes
volume 5, issue 3, page 145-153
ISSN 1045-6740 1099-1530
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.3430050304
container_title Permafrost and Periglacial Processes
container_volume 5
container_issue 3
container_start_page 145
op_container_end_page 153
_version_ 1810471748028596224