Occlusal microwear texture analysis and the diets of historical/prehistoric hunter‐gatherers

Abstract With the exception of few studies, occlusal microwear of pre‐agricultural modern humans has not been documented. In this study, microwear fabrics of samples from seven historic/prehistoric hunter‐gatherer populations with known and diverse dietary habits, representing mostly meat‐eaters fro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Journal of Osteoarchaeology
Main Author: El‐Zaatari, S.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oa.1027
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Foa.1027
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/oa.1027
id crwiley:10.1002/oa.1027
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1002/oa.1027 2024-06-23T07:50:40+00:00 Occlusal microwear texture analysis and the diets of historical/prehistoric hunter‐gatherers El‐Zaatari, S. 2008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oa.1027 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Foa.1027 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/oa.1027 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor International Journal of Osteoarchaeology volume 20, issue 1, page 67-87 ISSN 1047-482X 1099-1212 journal-article 2008 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1002/oa.1027 2024-06-13T04:24:03Z Abstract With the exception of few studies, occlusal microwear of pre‐agricultural modern humans has not been documented. In this study, microwear fabrics of samples from seven historic/prehistoric hunter‐gatherer populations with known and diverse dietary habits, representing mostly meat‐eaters from different environments, arctic/tundra (Tigara from Point Hope), cold‐steppe (Fuegians) and Mediterranean (Chumash), and mixed‐diet hunter‐gatherers from tropical climates (Andamanese and Khoe‐San from Matjes River, Riet River, and Oakhurst Shelter), were analysed to better understand how dietary differences affect microwear in these groups and to establish a reasonable comparative database for interpreting fossil hominins microwear. Significant microwear differences, related to diet and food preparation techniques, between the meat‐eaters and mixed‐diet hunter‐gatherers were detected. Finer scale differences within each of these dietary categories were also observed. Ethnographic accounts indicate that the Tigara and Andamanese ingested hard particles attached to their food as a result of their food preparation techniques; their microwear fabrics also reflect highly abrasive diets. On the other hand, as expected, the microwear signatures of the Chumash and Fuegians indicate a diet low in abrasives, reflecting their almost exclusive reliance on marine meat for subsistence and the low amounts of extraneous particles attached to this meat. The mixed‐diet Khoe‐San occupy an intermediate position between the Tigara and Andamanese on the one hand, and the Chumash and Fuegians on the other, with regard to the level of abrasives ingested. The Khoe‐San ate large amounts of hard plants, most likely responsible for abrading their enamel surface. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Tundra Wiley Online Library Arctic Point Hope ENVELOPE(173.306,173.306,52.911,52.911) International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 20 1 67 87
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract With the exception of few studies, occlusal microwear of pre‐agricultural modern humans has not been documented. In this study, microwear fabrics of samples from seven historic/prehistoric hunter‐gatherer populations with known and diverse dietary habits, representing mostly meat‐eaters from different environments, arctic/tundra (Tigara from Point Hope), cold‐steppe (Fuegians) and Mediterranean (Chumash), and mixed‐diet hunter‐gatherers from tropical climates (Andamanese and Khoe‐San from Matjes River, Riet River, and Oakhurst Shelter), were analysed to better understand how dietary differences affect microwear in these groups and to establish a reasonable comparative database for interpreting fossil hominins microwear. Significant microwear differences, related to diet and food preparation techniques, between the meat‐eaters and mixed‐diet hunter‐gatherers were detected. Finer scale differences within each of these dietary categories were also observed. Ethnographic accounts indicate that the Tigara and Andamanese ingested hard particles attached to their food as a result of their food preparation techniques; their microwear fabrics also reflect highly abrasive diets. On the other hand, as expected, the microwear signatures of the Chumash and Fuegians indicate a diet low in abrasives, reflecting their almost exclusive reliance on marine meat for subsistence and the low amounts of extraneous particles attached to this meat. The mixed‐diet Khoe‐San occupy an intermediate position between the Tigara and Andamanese on the one hand, and the Chumash and Fuegians on the other, with regard to the level of abrasives ingested. The Khoe‐San ate large amounts of hard plants, most likely responsible for abrading their enamel surface. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author El‐Zaatari, S.
spellingShingle El‐Zaatari, S.
Occlusal microwear texture analysis and the diets of historical/prehistoric hunter‐gatherers
author_facet El‐Zaatari, S.
author_sort El‐Zaatari, S.
title Occlusal microwear texture analysis and the diets of historical/prehistoric hunter‐gatherers
title_short Occlusal microwear texture analysis and the diets of historical/prehistoric hunter‐gatherers
title_full Occlusal microwear texture analysis and the diets of historical/prehistoric hunter‐gatherers
title_fullStr Occlusal microwear texture analysis and the diets of historical/prehistoric hunter‐gatherers
title_full_unstemmed Occlusal microwear texture analysis and the diets of historical/prehistoric hunter‐gatherers
title_sort occlusal microwear texture analysis and the diets of historical/prehistoric hunter‐gatherers
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2008
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oa.1027
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Foa.1027
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/oa.1027
long_lat ENVELOPE(173.306,173.306,52.911,52.911)
geographic Arctic
Point Hope
geographic_facet Arctic
Point Hope
genre Arctic
Tundra
genre_facet Arctic
Tundra
op_source International Journal of Osteoarchaeology
volume 20, issue 1, page 67-87
ISSN 1047-482X 1099-1212
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/oa.1027
container_title International Journal of Osteoarchaeology
container_volume 20
container_issue 1
container_start_page 67
op_container_end_page 87
_version_ 1802641579213586432