Detecting subsea permafrost layers on marine seismic data: An appraisal from forward modelling

ABSTRACT Detecting the top and base subsea permafrost from 2D seismic reflection data in shallow marine settings is a non‐trivial task due to the occurrence of strong free surface multiples. The potential to accurately detect permafrost layers on conventional 2D seismic reflection data is assessed t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Near Surface Geophysics
Main Authors: Duchesne, Mathieu J., Fabien‐Ouellet, Gabriel, Bustamante, Jefferson
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022
Subjects:
Ice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nsg.12231
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/nsg.12231
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/nsg.12231
id crwiley:10.1002/nsg.12231
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1002/nsg.12231 2024-09-15T18:11:22+00:00 Detecting subsea permafrost layers on marine seismic data: An appraisal from forward modelling Duchesne, Mathieu J. Fabien‐Ouellet, Gabriel Bustamante, Jefferson 2022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nsg.12231 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/nsg.12231 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/nsg.12231 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Near Surface Geophysics volume 21, issue 1, page 3-20 ISSN 1569-4445 1873-0604 journal-article 2022 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1002/nsg.12231 2024-08-09T04:26:53Z ABSTRACT Detecting the top and base subsea permafrost from 2D seismic reflection data in shallow marine settings is a non‐trivial task due to the occurrence of strong free surface multiples. The potential to accurately detect permafrost layers on conventional 2D seismic reflection data is assessed through viscoelastic modelling. Reflection imaging of permafrost layers is examined through the evaluation of specific characteristics of the subsurface, acquisition parameters and their impact. Results show that limitations are related to the principles of the method, the intrinsic nature of the permafrost layers, and the acquisition geometry. The biggest challenge is the occurrence of free surface multiples that overprint the base permafrost reflection, with the worst‐case scenario the case of a thin layer of ice‐bonded sand. Wedge models suggest that if the base permafrost is dipping, it would intersect internal and free surface multiples of the seafloor and the top permafrost and be detected. Also, the amplitude ratio of the base permafrost reflection and the multiples decreases with the increasing thickness of permafrost. Therefore, the crosscutting relationship between the reflection at base permafrost reflection and the multiples might not be enough to detect the base permafrost for thicker permafrost layers. Finally, the experiment results show that, for partially ice‐bonded layers, the attenuation combined with the low reflectivity of the basal interface limits the likelihood to resolve the base permafrost, especially for thick permafrost layers. Article in Journal/Newspaper Ice permafrost wedge* Wiley Online Library Near Surface Geophysics
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description ABSTRACT Detecting the top and base subsea permafrost from 2D seismic reflection data in shallow marine settings is a non‐trivial task due to the occurrence of strong free surface multiples. The potential to accurately detect permafrost layers on conventional 2D seismic reflection data is assessed through viscoelastic modelling. Reflection imaging of permafrost layers is examined through the evaluation of specific characteristics of the subsurface, acquisition parameters and their impact. Results show that limitations are related to the principles of the method, the intrinsic nature of the permafrost layers, and the acquisition geometry. The biggest challenge is the occurrence of free surface multiples that overprint the base permafrost reflection, with the worst‐case scenario the case of a thin layer of ice‐bonded sand. Wedge models suggest that if the base permafrost is dipping, it would intersect internal and free surface multiples of the seafloor and the top permafrost and be detected. Also, the amplitude ratio of the base permafrost reflection and the multiples decreases with the increasing thickness of permafrost. Therefore, the crosscutting relationship between the reflection at base permafrost reflection and the multiples might not be enough to detect the base permafrost for thicker permafrost layers. Finally, the experiment results show that, for partially ice‐bonded layers, the attenuation combined with the low reflectivity of the basal interface limits the likelihood to resolve the base permafrost, especially for thick permafrost layers.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Duchesne, Mathieu J.
Fabien‐Ouellet, Gabriel
Bustamante, Jefferson
spellingShingle Duchesne, Mathieu J.
Fabien‐Ouellet, Gabriel
Bustamante, Jefferson
Detecting subsea permafrost layers on marine seismic data: An appraisal from forward modelling
author_facet Duchesne, Mathieu J.
Fabien‐Ouellet, Gabriel
Bustamante, Jefferson
author_sort Duchesne, Mathieu J.
title Detecting subsea permafrost layers on marine seismic data: An appraisal from forward modelling
title_short Detecting subsea permafrost layers on marine seismic data: An appraisal from forward modelling
title_full Detecting subsea permafrost layers on marine seismic data: An appraisal from forward modelling
title_fullStr Detecting subsea permafrost layers on marine seismic data: An appraisal from forward modelling
title_full_unstemmed Detecting subsea permafrost layers on marine seismic data: An appraisal from forward modelling
title_sort detecting subsea permafrost layers on marine seismic data: an appraisal from forward modelling
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2022
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nsg.12231
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/nsg.12231
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/nsg.12231
genre Ice
permafrost
wedge*
genre_facet Ice
permafrost
wedge*
op_source Near Surface Geophysics
volume 21, issue 1, page 3-20
ISSN 1569-4445 1873-0604
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/nsg.12231
container_title Near Surface Geophysics
_version_ 1810448954051002368