Wolverine population density and home range size in Arctic Alaska

Abstract Understanding the spatial requirements of exploited wildlife species, including population density and home range size, is important for wildlife management and conservation. Wolverines ( Gulo gulo ) are hunted and trapped across the Arctic, and are vulnerable to numerous, often interrelate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of Wildlife Management
Main Authors: Glass, Thomas W., Robards, Martin D.
Other Authors: M.J. Murdock Charitable Trust, Wilburforce Foundation
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.22600
id crwiley:10.1002/jwmg.22600
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1002/jwmg.22600 2024-09-09T19:20:11+00:00 Wolverine population density and home range size in Arctic Alaska Glass, Thomas W. Robards, Martin D. M.J. Murdock Charitable Trust Wilburforce Foundation 2024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.22600 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor The Journal of Wildlife Management volume 88, issue 5 ISSN 0022-541X 1937-2817 journal-article 2024 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.22600 2024-06-18T04:10:42Z Abstract Understanding the spatial requirements of exploited wildlife species, including population density and home range size, is important for wildlife management and conservation. Wolverines ( Gulo gulo ) are hunted and trapped across the Arctic, and are vulnerable to numerous, often interrelated, threats resulting from anthropogenic changes in their environment. Previous population density estimates for wolverines in the Arctic range tenfold, from the lowest to highest available for the species, limiting their utility outside the specific areas and times they were derived. The most recent density estimate in Arctic Alaska, USA, was produced 4 decades ago and was derived from a relatively small study area. We evaluated wolverine population density and home range size across the North Slope of Alaska during 2017–2022 using global positioning system (GPS)‐based collar data and spatial capture‐recapture models. Population density estimates were 2.0 individuals/1,000 km 2 (95% credible interval = 1.3–3.5) in 2018 and 2.8 individuals/1,000 km 2 (95% credible interval = 1.7–3.5) in 2021. Median home range sizes modeled with autocorrelated kernel density estimators and Ornstein‐Uhlenbeck foraging movement processes were 699 km 2 (range = 158–2,895 km 2 ) among 12 females and 2,332 km 2 (range = 797–4,699 km 2 ) among 10 males. These population density estimates are nearly 10 times lower than the previous estimate for Arctic Alaska. We recommend incorporating this information into management strategies to ensure sustainable harvest, particularly as the region's remote areas are more efficiently accessed by hunters and are being considered for transportation corridors supporting new industrial development. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Gulo gulo north slope Alaska Wiley Online Library Arctic The Journal of Wildlife Management 88 5
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract Understanding the spatial requirements of exploited wildlife species, including population density and home range size, is important for wildlife management and conservation. Wolverines ( Gulo gulo ) are hunted and trapped across the Arctic, and are vulnerable to numerous, often interrelated, threats resulting from anthropogenic changes in their environment. Previous population density estimates for wolverines in the Arctic range tenfold, from the lowest to highest available for the species, limiting their utility outside the specific areas and times they were derived. The most recent density estimate in Arctic Alaska, USA, was produced 4 decades ago and was derived from a relatively small study area. We evaluated wolverine population density and home range size across the North Slope of Alaska during 2017–2022 using global positioning system (GPS)‐based collar data and spatial capture‐recapture models. Population density estimates were 2.0 individuals/1,000 km 2 (95% credible interval = 1.3–3.5) in 2018 and 2.8 individuals/1,000 km 2 (95% credible interval = 1.7–3.5) in 2021. Median home range sizes modeled with autocorrelated kernel density estimators and Ornstein‐Uhlenbeck foraging movement processes were 699 km 2 (range = 158–2,895 km 2 ) among 12 females and 2,332 km 2 (range = 797–4,699 km 2 ) among 10 males. These population density estimates are nearly 10 times lower than the previous estimate for Arctic Alaska. We recommend incorporating this information into management strategies to ensure sustainable harvest, particularly as the region's remote areas are more efficiently accessed by hunters and are being considered for transportation corridors supporting new industrial development.
author2 M.J. Murdock Charitable Trust
Wilburforce Foundation
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Glass, Thomas W.
Robards, Martin D.
spellingShingle Glass, Thomas W.
Robards, Martin D.
Wolverine population density and home range size in Arctic Alaska
author_facet Glass, Thomas W.
Robards, Martin D.
author_sort Glass, Thomas W.
title Wolverine population density and home range size in Arctic Alaska
title_short Wolverine population density and home range size in Arctic Alaska
title_full Wolverine population density and home range size in Arctic Alaska
title_fullStr Wolverine population density and home range size in Arctic Alaska
title_full_unstemmed Wolverine population density and home range size in Arctic Alaska
title_sort wolverine population density and home range size in arctic alaska
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2024
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.22600
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Gulo gulo
north slope
Alaska
genre_facet Arctic
Gulo gulo
north slope
Alaska
op_source The Journal of Wildlife Management
volume 88, issue 5
ISSN 0022-541X 1937-2817
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.22600
container_title The Journal of Wildlife Management
container_volume 88
container_issue 5
_version_ 1809760291329671168