Wolf monitoring in Scandinavia: evaluating counts of packs and reproduction events

Abstract Large carnivores are elusive and use large areas, which causes monitoring to be challenging and costly. Moreover, management to reduce conflicts and simultaneously ensure long‐term population viability require precise population estimates. In Scandinavia, the monitoring of wolves ( Canis lu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of Wildlife Management
Main Authors: Åkesson, Mikael, Svensson, Linn, Flagstad, Øystein, Wabakken, Petter, Frank, Jens
Other Authors: Naturvårdsverket
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.22206
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jwmg.22206
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/jwmg.22206
id crwiley:10.1002/jwmg.22206
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1002/jwmg.22206 2024-09-15T18:01:19+00:00 Wolf monitoring in Scandinavia: evaluating counts of packs and reproduction events Åkesson, Mikael Svensson, Linn Flagstad, Øystein Wabakken, Petter Frank, Jens Naturvårdsverket 2022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.22206 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jwmg.22206 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/jwmg.22206 en eng Wiley http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ The Journal of Wildlife Management volume 86, issue 4 ISSN 0022-541X 1937-2817 journal-article 2022 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.22206 2024-06-27T04:21:34Z Abstract Large carnivores are elusive and use large areas, which causes monitoring to be challenging and costly. Moreover, management to reduce conflicts and simultaneously ensure long‐term population viability require precise population estimates. In Scandinavia, the monitoring of wolves ( Canis lupus ) is primarily based on counting packs, identifying reproduction, and genetically identifying territorial wolves from noninvasive DNA samples. We assessed the reliability of wolf monitoring in Scandinavia by estimating the detectability of territorial pairs, packs, and reproduction. Our data, comprising snow‐tracking data and DNA‐identified individuals from 2005–2016, covered 11 consecutive winter monitoring seasons (Oct–Mar). Among 343 cases where we identified a wolf pack, territorial wolves were also detected in the same area during the previous season in 323 (94.2%) cases. In only 6 of the remaining 20 cases, there was no prior knowledge of territorial wolves in the area. Among the 328 detected reproduction events (litter born to a pack), we detected 97% during the monitoring period and identified the rest ≥1 year later from kinship assessments of all DNA‐detected individuals. These results suggest that we failed to detect only few packs with reproduction events during the monitoring season that followed breeding. Yearly monitoring of territorial individuals and continuous updates of the pedigree allowed us to retrospectively identify reproduction events and packs that were not identified earlier. Article in Journal/Newspaper Canis lupus Wiley Online Library The Journal of Wildlife Management 86 4
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract Large carnivores are elusive and use large areas, which causes monitoring to be challenging and costly. Moreover, management to reduce conflicts and simultaneously ensure long‐term population viability require precise population estimates. In Scandinavia, the monitoring of wolves ( Canis lupus ) is primarily based on counting packs, identifying reproduction, and genetically identifying territorial wolves from noninvasive DNA samples. We assessed the reliability of wolf monitoring in Scandinavia by estimating the detectability of territorial pairs, packs, and reproduction. Our data, comprising snow‐tracking data and DNA‐identified individuals from 2005–2016, covered 11 consecutive winter monitoring seasons (Oct–Mar). Among 343 cases where we identified a wolf pack, territorial wolves were also detected in the same area during the previous season in 323 (94.2%) cases. In only 6 of the remaining 20 cases, there was no prior knowledge of territorial wolves in the area. Among the 328 detected reproduction events (litter born to a pack), we detected 97% during the monitoring period and identified the rest ≥1 year later from kinship assessments of all DNA‐detected individuals. These results suggest that we failed to detect only few packs with reproduction events during the monitoring season that followed breeding. Yearly monitoring of territorial individuals and continuous updates of the pedigree allowed us to retrospectively identify reproduction events and packs that were not identified earlier.
author2 Naturvårdsverket
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Åkesson, Mikael
Svensson, Linn
Flagstad, Øystein
Wabakken, Petter
Frank, Jens
spellingShingle Åkesson, Mikael
Svensson, Linn
Flagstad, Øystein
Wabakken, Petter
Frank, Jens
Wolf monitoring in Scandinavia: evaluating counts of packs and reproduction events
author_facet Åkesson, Mikael
Svensson, Linn
Flagstad, Øystein
Wabakken, Petter
Frank, Jens
author_sort Åkesson, Mikael
title Wolf monitoring in Scandinavia: evaluating counts of packs and reproduction events
title_short Wolf monitoring in Scandinavia: evaluating counts of packs and reproduction events
title_full Wolf monitoring in Scandinavia: evaluating counts of packs and reproduction events
title_fullStr Wolf monitoring in Scandinavia: evaluating counts of packs and reproduction events
title_full_unstemmed Wolf monitoring in Scandinavia: evaluating counts of packs and reproduction events
title_sort wolf monitoring in scandinavia: evaluating counts of packs and reproduction events
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2022
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.22206
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jwmg.22206
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/jwmg.22206
genre Canis lupus
genre_facet Canis lupus
op_source The Journal of Wildlife Management
volume 86, issue 4
ISSN 0022-541X 1937-2817
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.22206
container_title The Journal of Wildlife Management
container_volume 86
container_issue 4
_version_ 1810438474858233856