A noninvasive and integrative approach for improving density and abundance estimates of moose

• Published in: The Journal of Wildlife Management
• Main Authors: Koitzsch, Ky B., Anton, Colby B., Koitzsch, Lisa O., Tjepkes, Tessa L., Schumann, Abby C., Strasburg, Jared L.
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2022
• Subjects: Alces alces
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.22200; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jwmg.22200; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/jwmg.22200

Abstract Acquiring demographic data for moose ( Alces alces ) can be difficult because they are solitary in nature, they prefer densely vegetated and mountainous habitats, and they often occur at low density. Such data, however, are essential for long‐term population monitoring, evaluating management practices, and effective conservation. Winter aerial surveys are the standard method for estimating moose population parameters, but they can be logistically challenging, expensive, and subject to sightability correction, which necessitates the capture of study animals for initial model development. Herein, we demonstrate a noninvasive alternative approach for estimating population parameters of moose in northern Yellowstone National Park, where aerial surveys were attempted but proved ineffective. We determined individual moose genotype and sex using microsatellite polymerase chain reaction amplification of DNA extracted from fecal pellets, integrated ancillary pellet sample data (i.e., metadata) in genotype analysis to aid in the identification of matching genotypes, and used spatially explicit capture‐recapture (SECR) modeling to estimate sex‐specific density and abundance. We collected 616 samples over 3 consecutive winters (Dec 2013–Apr 2016) and within 2 sampling occasions each winter. We recorded 514 captures of 142 individual moose (69 males, 73 females). Overall density ranged between 0.062 moose/km 2 and 0.076 moose/km 2 and averaged 0.034/km 2 for females and 0.033/km 2 for males. Abundance estimates were 150 moose in 2013 (female = 76, 95% CI = 55–105; male = 74, 95% CI = 54–103), 186 in 2014 (female = 95, 95% CI = 63–142; male = 91, 95% CI = 60–138), and 160 in 2015 (female = 79, 95% CI = 58–108; male = 81, 95% CI = 59–110). Average population sex ratio was 0.99 males/female. We demonstrate that SECR analysis of fecal DNA genotypes, using metadata in genotype analysis to help identify matching moose genotypes, is a promising alternative method for estimating sex‐specific density and abundance of a ...