Acute Thermal and Stress Response in Moose to Chemical Immobilization

ABSTRACT Management and research of moose ( Alces alces ) in Alaska, USA, often require chemical immobilization; however, moose may be prone to capture‐induced hyperthermia while immobilized. We chemically immobilized moose with carfentanil citrate and xylazine hydrochloride to measure rump fat dept...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of Wildlife Management
Main Authors: Thompson, Daniel P., Crouse, John A., McDonough, Thomas J., Barboza, Perry S., Jaques, Scott
Other Authors: Alaska Department of Fish and Game
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.21871
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fjwmg.21871
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jwmg.21871
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/jwmg.21871
id crwiley:10.1002/jwmg.21871
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1002/jwmg.21871 2024-09-15T17:36:20+00:00 Acute Thermal and Stress Response in Moose to Chemical Immobilization Thompson, Daniel P. Crouse, John A. McDonough, Thomas J. Barboza, Perry S. Jaques, Scott Alaska Department of Fish and Game 2020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.21871 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fjwmg.21871 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jwmg.21871 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/jwmg.21871 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor The Journal of Wildlife Management volume 84, issue 6, page 1051-1062 ISSN 0022-541X 1937-2817 journal-article 2020 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.21871 2024-08-13T04:14:54Z ABSTRACT Management and research of moose ( Alces alces ) in Alaska, USA, often require chemical immobilization; however, moose may be prone to capture‐induced hyperthermia while immobilized. We chemically immobilized moose with carfentanil citrate and xylazine hydrochloride to measure rump fat depth, collect blood and fecal samples, and to deploy modified vaginal implant transmitters and global positioning system (GPS)‐collars for recording body temperature and movement during and after the chemical immobilization. We predicted wild moose pursued and captured from a helicopter would have elevated body temperature at time of capture, whereas body temperature would remain stable in hand‐raised captive moose not pursued and only hand‐injected for immobilization. Additionally, we expected post‐capture body temperature would be a function of activity, time immobilized, and ambient temperature. As predicted, body temperature of wild moose was elevated 1 hour after capture (38.9°C, 95% CI = 38.7–39.1°C) but returned to baseline levels within 3 hours (38.0°C, 95% CI = 37.9–38.1°C); however, body temperatures then rose above baseline levels and remained elevated 12–48 hours post‐capture when movement rates were also elevated. Body temperatures in captive moose were not elevated 1‐hour post‐immobilization (37.9°C, 95% CI = 37.8–38.0°C). Body temperatures of wild moose were positively related to cortisol levels at time of capture. Two moose that died after immobilization had initial body temperatures similar to other immobilized moose; however, their body temperature began to rise at 17 hours and 40 hours post‐immobilization. Our study provides evidence that chemical immobilization affects body temperature and movement of wild moose up to 48 hours after capture, possibly as a result of renarcotization from carfentanil citrate. With advancements in technology, we recommend fine‐scale GPS data (<1‐hr fix rates) and continuous body temperature be evaluated to detect evidence of renarcotization during and after ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Alces alces Alaska Wiley Online Library The Journal of Wildlife Management 84 6 1051 1062
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description ABSTRACT Management and research of moose ( Alces alces ) in Alaska, USA, often require chemical immobilization; however, moose may be prone to capture‐induced hyperthermia while immobilized. We chemically immobilized moose with carfentanil citrate and xylazine hydrochloride to measure rump fat depth, collect blood and fecal samples, and to deploy modified vaginal implant transmitters and global positioning system (GPS)‐collars for recording body temperature and movement during and after the chemical immobilization. We predicted wild moose pursued and captured from a helicopter would have elevated body temperature at time of capture, whereas body temperature would remain stable in hand‐raised captive moose not pursued and only hand‐injected for immobilization. Additionally, we expected post‐capture body temperature would be a function of activity, time immobilized, and ambient temperature. As predicted, body temperature of wild moose was elevated 1 hour after capture (38.9°C, 95% CI = 38.7–39.1°C) but returned to baseline levels within 3 hours (38.0°C, 95% CI = 37.9–38.1°C); however, body temperatures then rose above baseline levels and remained elevated 12–48 hours post‐capture when movement rates were also elevated. Body temperatures in captive moose were not elevated 1‐hour post‐immobilization (37.9°C, 95% CI = 37.8–38.0°C). Body temperatures of wild moose were positively related to cortisol levels at time of capture. Two moose that died after immobilization had initial body temperatures similar to other immobilized moose; however, their body temperature began to rise at 17 hours and 40 hours post‐immobilization. Our study provides evidence that chemical immobilization affects body temperature and movement of wild moose up to 48 hours after capture, possibly as a result of renarcotization from carfentanil citrate. With advancements in technology, we recommend fine‐scale GPS data (<1‐hr fix rates) and continuous body temperature be evaluated to detect evidence of renarcotization during and after ...
author2 Alaska Department of Fish and Game
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Thompson, Daniel P.
Crouse, John A.
McDonough, Thomas J.
Barboza, Perry S.
Jaques, Scott
spellingShingle Thompson, Daniel P.
Crouse, John A.
McDonough, Thomas J.
Barboza, Perry S.
Jaques, Scott
Acute Thermal and Stress Response in Moose to Chemical Immobilization
author_facet Thompson, Daniel P.
Crouse, John A.
McDonough, Thomas J.
Barboza, Perry S.
Jaques, Scott
author_sort Thompson, Daniel P.
title Acute Thermal and Stress Response in Moose to Chemical Immobilization
title_short Acute Thermal and Stress Response in Moose to Chemical Immobilization
title_full Acute Thermal and Stress Response in Moose to Chemical Immobilization
title_fullStr Acute Thermal and Stress Response in Moose to Chemical Immobilization
title_full_unstemmed Acute Thermal and Stress Response in Moose to Chemical Immobilization
title_sort acute thermal and stress response in moose to chemical immobilization
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2020
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.21871
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fjwmg.21871
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jwmg.21871
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/jwmg.21871
genre Alces alces
Alaska
genre_facet Alces alces
Alaska
op_source The Journal of Wildlife Management
volume 84, issue 6, page 1051-1062
ISSN 0022-541X 1937-2817
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.21871
container_title The Journal of Wildlife Management
container_volume 84
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1051
op_container_end_page 1062
_version_ 1810488784441049088