Evaluating response distances to develop buffer zones for staging terns
ABSTRACT Buffer zones, calculated by flight‐initiation distance (FID), are often used to reduce anthropogenic disturbances to wildlife, but FID can vary significantly across life‐history stages. We examined the behavioral effect of potential natural (gulls and shorebirds) and anthropogenic (pedestri...
Published in: | The Journal of Wildlife Management |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Other Authors: | , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.21594 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fjwmg.21594 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jwmg.21594 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/jwmg.21594 https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/am-pdf/10.1002/jwmg.21594 |
id |
crwiley:10.1002/jwmg.21594 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
crwiley:10.1002/jwmg.21594 2024-06-02T08:05:28+00:00 Evaluating response distances to develop buffer zones for staging terns Althouse, Melissa A. Cohen, Jonathan B. Karpanty, Sarah M. Spendelow, Jeffrey A. Davis, Kayla L. Parsons, Katharine C. Luttazi, Cristin F. National Park Service U.S. Geological Survey 2018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.21594 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fjwmg.21594 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jwmg.21594 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/jwmg.21594 https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/am-pdf/10.1002/jwmg.21594 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#am http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor The Journal of Wildlife Management volume 83, issue 2, page 260-271 ISSN 0022-541X 1937-2817 journal-article 2018 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.21594 2024-05-03T12:02:17Z ABSTRACT Buffer zones, calculated by flight‐initiation distance (FID), are often used to reduce anthropogenic disturbances to wildlife, but FID can vary significantly across life‐history stages. We examined the behavioral effect of potential natural (gulls and shorebirds) and anthropogenic (pedestrians) disturbance sources to staging roseate ( Sterna dougallii ) and common tern ( S. hirundo ) flocks from July to September in 2014 and 2015 at Cape Cod, Massachusetts, USA. We estimated the proportion of the flock exhibiting different responses to potential disturbance sources as a function of distance, flock size, percent roseate terns, and local disturbance rates, using Bayesian zero‐and‐one inflated beta regression. The proportion of tern flocks responding to the presence of shorebirds by flying was low (0.01 ± 0.001 [SE]) and did not vary by distance or other covariates, whereas the proportion flying in response to gulls increased as distance decreased, with smaller flocks, and with flocks with a larger proportion of roseate terns being more sensitive to gull presence. Prolonged flight response rapidly increased in probability from 0.0 to as much as 1.0 as distance from pedestrians to the flock decreased from 100 m and was much more likely with smaller flocks. Pedestrian activity levels also had an effect on flock responses; those engaged in active behaviors such as jogging were more likely to cause flushing than those engaged in passive behaviors. Terns seemed to view pedestrians as more of a threat than shorebirds and gulls, even though gulls are frequent kleptoparasites of terns. Pedestrians >120 m from a tern flock generally elicited the same probability of flight response as shorebirds and gulls. We recommend managers maintain anthropogenic disturbance levels at or below the intensity of those from natural sources at sites where recreation and wildlife values are both important. Because staging tern flocks may use a variety of areas within a site, we recommend instituting a 100‐m buffer around areas ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Common tern Wiley Online Library Fid ENVELOPE(-65.939,-65.939,-68.664,-68.664) The Journal of Wildlife Management 83 2 260 271 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Wiley Online Library |
op_collection_id |
crwiley |
language |
English |
description |
ABSTRACT Buffer zones, calculated by flight‐initiation distance (FID), are often used to reduce anthropogenic disturbances to wildlife, but FID can vary significantly across life‐history stages. We examined the behavioral effect of potential natural (gulls and shorebirds) and anthropogenic (pedestrians) disturbance sources to staging roseate ( Sterna dougallii ) and common tern ( S. hirundo ) flocks from July to September in 2014 and 2015 at Cape Cod, Massachusetts, USA. We estimated the proportion of the flock exhibiting different responses to potential disturbance sources as a function of distance, flock size, percent roseate terns, and local disturbance rates, using Bayesian zero‐and‐one inflated beta regression. The proportion of tern flocks responding to the presence of shorebirds by flying was low (0.01 ± 0.001 [SE]) and did not vary by distance or other covariates, whereas the proportion flying in response to gulls increased as distance decreased, with smaller flocks, and with flocks with a larger proportion of roseate terns being more sensitive to gull presence. Prolonged flight response rapidly increased in probability from 0.0 to as much as 1.0 as distance from pedestrians to the flock decreased from 100 m and was much more likely with smaller flocks. Pedestrian activity levels also had an effect on flock responses; those engaged in active behaviors such as jogging were more likely to cause flushing than those engaged in passive behaviors. Terns seemed to view pedestrians as more of a threat than shorebirds and gulls, even though gulls are frequent kleptoparasites of terns. Pedestrians >120 m from a tern flock generally elicited the same probability of flight response as shorebirds and gulls. We recommend managers maintain anthropogenic disturbance levels at or below the intensity of those from natural sources at sites where recreation and wildlife values are both important. Because staging tern flocks may use a variety of areas within a site, we recommend instituting a 100‐m buffer around areas ... |
author2 |
National Park Service U.S. Geological Survey |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Althouse, Melissa A. Cohen, Jonathan B. Karpanty, Sarah M. Spendelow, Jeffrey A. Davis, Kayla L. Parsons, Katharine C. Luttazi, Cristin F. |
spellingShingle |
Althouse, Melissa A. Cohen, Jonathan B. Karpanty, Sarah M. Spendelow, Jeffrey A. Davis, Kayla L. Parsons, Katharine C. Luttazi, Cristin F. Evaluating response distances to develop buffer zones for staging terns |
author_facet |
Althouse, Melissa A. Cohen, Jonathan B. Karpanty, Sarah M. Spendelow, Jeffrey A. Davis, Kayla L. Parsons, Katharine C. Luttazi, Cristin F. |
author_sort |
Althouse, Melissa A. |
title |
Evaluating response distances to develop buffer zones for staging terns |
title_short |
Evaluating response distances to develop buffer zones for staging terns |
title_full |
Evaluating response distances to develop buffer zones for staging terns |
title_fullStr |
Evaluating response distances to develop buffer zones for staging terns |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluating response distances to develop buffer zones for staging terns |
title_sort |
evaluating response distances to develop buffer zones for staging terns |
publisher |
Wiley |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.21594 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fjwmg.21594 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jwmg.21594 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/jwmg.21594 https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/am-pdf/10.1002/jwmg.21594 |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(-65.939,-65.939,-68.664,-68.664) |
geographic |
Fid |
geographic_facet |
Fid |
genre |
Common tern |
genre_facet |
Common tern |
op_source |
The Journal of Wildlife Management volume 83, issue 2, page 260-271 ISSN 0022-541X 1937-2817 |
op_rights |
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#am http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.21594 |
container_title |
The Journal of Wildlife Management |
container_volume |
83 |
container_issue |
2 |
container_start_page |
260 |
op_container_end_page |
271 |
_version_ |
1800750283323604992 |