National benchmarking between the Nordic countries on the quality of care

Abstract This paper describes the Nordic Indicator Project that aims at describing and analysing the quality of care for important diseases in the Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Greenland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden). The Council of Ministers decided to appoint a working group for quality mappi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Surgical Oncology
Main Authors: Mainz, Jan, Hjulsager, Morten, og, Mette Thorup Eriksen, Burgaard, Jytte
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jso.21204
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fjso.21204
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jso.21204
id crwiley:10.1002/jso.21204
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1002/jso.21204 2024-06-02T08:07:32+00:00 National benchmarking between the Nordic countries on the quality of care Mainz, Jan Hjulsager, Morten og, Mette Thorup Eriksen Burgaard, Jytte 2008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jso.21204 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fjso.21204 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jso.21204 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Journal of Surgical Oncology volume 99, issue 8, page 505-507 ISSN 0022-4790 1096-9098 journal-article 2008 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.21204 2024-05-03T11:01:00Z Abstract This paper describes the Nordic Indicator Project that aims at describing and analysing the quality of care for important diseases in the Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Greenland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden). The Council of Ministers decided to appoint a working group for quality mapping with the aim of giving Nordic citizens, politicians, health workers and authorities the opportunity to evaluate and compare performance across the Nordic countries. The working group selected 36 prioritised quality indicators, including cancer indicators, for benchmarking between the Nordic countries. Additionally, 40 ‘potential indicators’ have been identified for future developments. This international projects document how difficult it is to do international benchmarking. The experience of the Nordic Council of Ministers Quality Project has shown that even for common indicators as survival and mortality rates for breast cancer, colorectal cancer and lung cancer etc., it is difficult to yield data that are representative to the international nations as a whole. It seems that modern health care systems are not able do document their quality. At national and international level we need to invest in quality measurement systems and in international collaboration. J. Surg. Oncol. 2009;99:505–507. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. Article in Journal/Newspaper Greenland Iceland Wiley Online Library Greenland Norway Journal of Surgical Oncology 99 8 505 507
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract This paper describes the Nordic Indicator Project that aims at describing and analysing the quality of care for important diseases in the Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Greenland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden). The Council of Ministers decided to appoint a working group for quality mapping with the aim of giving Nordic citizens, politicians, health workers and authorities the opportunity to evaluate and compare performance across the Nordic countries. The working group selected 36 prioritised quality indicators, including cancer indicators, for benchmarking between the Nordic countries. Additionally, 40 ‘potential indicators’ have been identified for future developments. This international projects document how difficult it is to do international benchmarking. The experience of the Nordic Council of Ministers Quality Project has shown that even for common indicators as survival and mortality rates for breast cancer, colorectal cancer and lung cancer etc., it is difficult to yield data that are representative to the international nations as a whole. It seems that modern health care systems are not able do document their quality. At national and international level we need to invest in quality measurement systems and in international collaboration. J. Surg. Oncol. 2009;99:505–507. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Mainz, Jan
Hjulsager, Morten
og, Mette Thorup Eriksen
Burgaard, Jytte
spellingShingle Mainz, Jan
Hjulsager, Morten
og, Mette Thorup Eriksen
Burgaard, Jytte
National benchmarking between the Nordic countries on the quality of care
author_facet Mainz, Jan
Hjulsager, Morten
og, Mette Thorup Eriksen
Burgaard, Jytte
author_sort Mainz, Jan
title National benchmarking between the Nordic countries on the quality of care
title_short National benchmarking between the Nordic countries on the quality of care
title_full National benchmarking between the Nordic countries on the quality of care
title_fullStr National benchmarking between the Nordic countries on the quality of care
title_full_unstemmed National benchmarking between the Nordic countries on the quality of care
title_sort national benchmarking between the nordic countries on the quality of care
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2008
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jso.21204
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fjso.21204
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jso.21204
geographic Greenland
Norway
geographic_facet Greenland
Norway
genre Greenland
Iceland
genre_facet Greenland
Iceland
op_source Journal of Surgical Oncology
volume 99, issue 8, page 505-507
ISSN 0022-4790 1096-9098
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.21204
container_title Journal of Surgical Oncology
container_volume 99
container_issue 8
container_start_page 505
op_container_end_page 507
_version_ 1800752635176812544