Sea‐level change in the Irish Sea since the Last Glacial Maximum: constraints from isostatic modelling

Abstract Models of glacio‐hydroisostatic sea‐level change have been published for the British Isles that are broadly consistent with the observational evidence, as well as with glaciological constraints. It has been argued, however, that the models fail to represent sea‐level change along the Irish...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Quaternary Science
Main Authors: Lambeck, Kurt, Purcell, Anthony P.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2001
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jqs.638
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fjqs.638
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jqs.638
id crwiley:10.1002/jqs.638
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1002/jqs.638 2024-06-02T08:08:20+00:00 Sea‐level change in the Irish Sea since the Last Glacial Maximum: constraints from isostatic modelling Lambeck, Kurt Purcell, Anthony P. 2001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jqs.638 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fjqs.638 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jqs.638 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Journal of Quaternary Science volume 16, issue 5, page 497-506 ISSN 0267-8179 1099-1417 journal-article 2001 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1002/jqs.638 2024-05-03T12:00:30Z Abstract Models of glacio‐hydroisostatic sea‐level change have been published for the British Isles that are broadly consistent with the observational evidence, as well as with glaciological constraints. It has been argued, however, that the models fail to represent sea‐level change along the Irish Sea margins and in southern Ireland for the post‐deglaciation period. The argument rests on the interpretation of the depositional environment of the elevated ‘Irish Sea Drift’ on both sides of the Irish Sea: whether this is terrestrial or glaciomarine. The isostatic models for the British Isles are consistent with the former interpretation in that sea‐levels on either side of the Irish Sea, south of about the Isle of Man, are not predicted to have risen above present sea‐level at any time since the deglaciation of the Irish Sea. This implies that ice over both the Irish Sea and Ireland was relatively thin (ca. 600–700 m over Ireland). If the glaciomarine interpretation of the elevated Irish Sea Drift is correct, then the maximum ice thickness over central and southern Ireland would have to reach 2000 m, exceeding that over Scotland. Furthermore, for the resulting sea‐level change to be consistent with the Holocene evidence, this thick ice sheet could not have extended to the eastern side of the Irish Sea. Nor could it have been very thick at its northern and western limits. If such an ice model is extreme and incompatible with glaciological observations then the alternative is to accept the interpretation of the Irish Sea Drift as terrestrial in origin. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Article in Journal/Newspaper Ice Sheet Wiley Online Library Journal of Quaternary Science 16 5 497 506
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract Models of glacio‐hydroisostatic sea‐level change have been published for the British Isles that are broadly consistent with the observational evidence, as well as with glaciological constraints. It has been argued, however, that the models fail to represent sea‐level change along the Irish Sea margins and in southern Ireland for the post‐deglaciation period. The argument rests on the interpretation of the depositional environment of the elevated ‘Irish Sea Drift’ on both sides of the Irish Sea: whether this is terrestrial or glaciomarine. The isostatic models for the British Isles are consistent with the former interpretation in that sea‐levels on either side of the Irish Sea, south of about the Isle of Man, are not predicted to have risen above present sea‐level at any time since the deglaciation of the Irish Sea. This implies that ice over both the Irish Sea and Ireland was relatively thin (ca. 600–700 m over Ireland). If the glaciomarine interpretation of the elevated Irish Sea Drift is correct, then the maximum ice thickness over central and southern Ireland would have to reach 2000 m, exceeding that over Scotland. Furthermore, for the resulting sea‐level change to be consistent with the Holocene evidence, this thick ice sheet could not have extended to the eastern side of the Irish Sea. Nor could it have been very thick at its northern and western limits. If such an ice model is extreme and incompatible with glaciological observations then the alternative is to accept the interpretation of the Irish Sea Drift as terrestrial in origin. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Lambeck, Kurt
Purcell, Anthony P.
spellingShingle Lambeck, Kurt
Purcell, Anthony P.
Sea‐level change in the Irish Sea since the Last Glacial Maximum: constraints from isostatic modelling
author_facet Lambeck, Kurt
Purcell, Anthony P.
author_sort Lambeck, Kurt
title Sea‐level change in the Irish Sea since the Last Glacial Maximum: constraints from isostatic modelling
title_short Sea‐level change in the Irish Sea since the Last Glacial Maximum: constraints from isostatic modelling
title_full Sea‐level change in the Irish Sea since the Last Glacial Maximum: constraints from isostatic modelling
title_fullStr Sea‐level change in the Irish Sea since the Last Glacial Maximum: constraints from isostatic modelling
title_full_unstemmed Sea‐level change in the Irish Sea since the Last Glacial Maximum: constraints from isostatic modelling
title_sort sea‐level change in the irish sea since the last glacial maximum: constraints from isostatic modelling
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2001
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jqs.638
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fjqs.638
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jqs.638
genre Ice Sheet
genre_facet Ice Sheet
op_source Journal of Quaternary Science
volume 16, issue 5, page 497-506
ISSN 0267-8179 1099-1417
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/jqs.638
container_title Journal of Quaternary Science
container_volume 16
container_issue 5
container_start_page 497
op_container_end_page 506
_version_ 1800753541943394304