Constraining the geometry and volume of the Barents Sea Ice Sheet

ABSTRACT The ice load configuration of the Barents Sea Ice Sheet (BSIS) over the last glacial cycle is in dispute. The traditional reconstruction, motivated by the observation that paleo‐shoreline emergence increases towards the center of the Barents Sea, places a single dome in the center of the Ba...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Quaternary Science
Main Authors: Kachuck, Samuel B., Cathles, Lawrence M.
Other Authors: DATED-2
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jqs.3031
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fjqs.3031
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jqs.3031
id crwiley:10.1002/jqs.3031
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1002/jqs.3031 2024-06-02T08:04:06+00:00 Constraining the geometry and volume of the Barents Sea Ice Sheet Kachuck, Samuel B. Cathles, Lawrence M. DATED-2 2018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jqs.3031 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fjqs.3031 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jqs.3031 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Journal of Quaternary Science volume 33, issue 5, page 527-535 ISSN 0267-8179 1099-1417 journal-article 2018 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1002/jqs.3031 2024-05-03T11:46:27Z ABSTRACT The ice load configuration of the Barents Sea Ice Sheet (BSIS) over the last glacial cycle is in dispute. The traditional reconstruction, motivated by the observation that paleo‐shoreline emergence increases towards the center of the Barents Sea, places a single dome in the center of the Barents Sea at the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) that collapses to island‐centered loads during deglaciation. Observations that suggest that ice flowed from the islands into the Barents even at the LGM motivate another reconstruction that places the ice loads over the islands with minimal marine ice. We analyze an ensemble of ice loads that are consistent with the geophysical observations and show that current relative sea level, GPS and gravity measurements do not and cannot distinguish a central dome from an island‐centered BSIS. What is needed are constraints in the central Barents. Improving the gravity data sufficiently will be difficult. However, obtaining even a single GPS uplift rate measurement in the central Barents would resolve the central dome versus island‐centered BSIS geometry question. Uncertainty in the Barents Sea ice load geometry provides a good illustration of statistical methods that we believe will be useful in other areas of glaciology. Article in Journal/Newspaper Barents Sea Ice Sheet Sea ice Wiley Online Library Barents Sea Journal of Quaternary Science 33 5 527 535
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description ABSTRACT The ice load configuration of the Barents Sea Ice Sheet (BSIS) over the last glacial cycle is in dispute. The traditional reconstruction, motivated by the observation that paleo‐shoreline emergence increases towards the center of the Barents Sea, places a single dome in the center of the Barents Sea at the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) that collapses to island‐centered loads during deglaciation. Observations that suggest that ice flowed from the islands into the Barents even at the LGM motivate another reconstruction that places the ice loads over the islands with minimal marine ice. We analyze an ensemble of ice loads that are consistent with the geophysical observations and show that current relative sea level, GPS and gravity measurements do not and cannot distinguish a central dome from an island‐centered BSIS. What is needed are constraints in the central Barents. Improving the gravity data sufficiently will be difficult. However, obtaining even a single GPS uplift rate measurement in the central Barents would resolve the central dome versus island‐centered BSIS geometry question. Uncertainty in the Barents Sea ice load geometry provides a good illustration of statistical methods that we believe will be useful in other areas of glaciology.
author2 DATED-2
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Kachuck, Samuel B.
Cathles, Lawrence M.
spellingShingle Kachuck, Samuel B.
Cathles, Lawrence M.
Constraining the geometry and volume of the Barents Sea Ice Sheet
author_facet Kachuck, Samuel B.
Cathles, Lawrence M.
author_sort Kachuck, Samuel B.
title Constraining the geometry and volume of the Barents Sea Ice Sheet
title_short Constraining the geometry and volume of the Barents Sea Ice Sheet
title_full Constraining the geometry and volume of the Barents Sea Ice Sheet
title_fullStr Constraining the geometry and volume of the Barents Sea Ice Sheet
title_full_unstemmed Constraining the geometry and volume of the Barents Sea Ice Sheet
title_sort constraining the geometry and volume of the barents sea ice sheet
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2018
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jqs.3031
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fjqs.3031
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jqs.3031
geographic Barents Sea
geographic_facet Barents Sea
genre Barents Sea
Ice Sheet
Sea ice
genre_facet Barents Sea
Ice Sheet
Sea ice
op_source Journal of Quaternary Science
volume 33, issue 5, page 527-535
ISSN 0267-8179 1099-1417
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/jqs.3031
container_title Journal of Quaternary Science
container_volume 33
container_issue 5
container_start_page 527
op_container_end_page 535
_version_ 1800748725230895104