Most domestic dogs ( Canis lupus familiaris) prefer food to petting: population, context, and schedule effects in concurrent choice

Previous research has indicated both petting (McIntire & Colley, 1967) and food (Feuerbacher & Wynne, 2012) have reinforcing effects on dog behavior and support social behavior towards humans (food: Elliot & King, 1960; social interaction: Brodbeck, 1954). Which type of interaction dogs...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
Main Authors: Feuerbacher, Erica N., Wynne, Clive D. L.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jeab.81
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fjeab.81
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jeab.81
id crwiley:10.1002/jeab.81
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1002/jeab.81 2024-06-02T08:05:03+00:00 Most domestic dogs ( Canis lupus familiaris) prefer food to petting: population, context, and schedule effects in concurrent choice Feuerbacher, Erica N. Wynne, Clive D. L. 2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jeab.81 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fjeab.81 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jeab.81 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior volume 101, issue 3, page 385-405 ISSN 0022-5002 1938-3711 journal-article 2014 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.81 2024-05-03T10:39:26Z Previous research has indicated both petting (McIntire & Colley, 1967) and food (Feuerbacher & Wynne, 2012) have reinforcing effects on dog behavior and support social behavior towards humans (food: Elliot & King, 1960; social interaction: Brodbeck, 1954). Which type of interaction dogs prefer and which might produce the most social behavior from a dog has not been investigated. In the current study, we assessed how dogs allocated their responding in a concurrent choice between food and petting. Dogs received five 5‐min sessions each. In Session 1, both food and petting were continuously delivered contingent on the dog being near the person providing the respective consequence. Across the next three sessions, we thinned the food schedule to a Fixed Interval (FI) 15‐s, FI 1‐min, and finally extinction. The fifth session reversed back to the original food contingency. We tested owned dogs in familiar (daycare) and unfamiliar (laboratory room) environments, and with their owner or a stranger as the person providing petting. In general, dogs preferred food to petting when food was readily available and all groups showed sensitivity to the thinning food schedule by decreasing their time allocation to food, although there were group and individual differences in the level of sensitivity. How dogs allocated their time with the petting alternative also varied. We found effects of context, familiarity of the person providing petting, and relative deprivation from social interaction on the amount of time dogs allocated to the petting alternative. Article in Journal/Newspaper Canis lupus Wiley Online Library Elliot ENVELOPE(166.533,166.533,-70.883,-70.883) Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 101 3 385 405
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Previous research has indicated both petting (McIntire & Colley, 1967) and food (Feuerbacher & Wynne, 2012) have reinforcing effects on dog behavior and support social behavior towards humans (food: Elliot & King, 1960; social interaction: Brodbeck, 1954). Which type of interaction dogs prefer and which might produce the most social behavior from a dog has not been investigated. In the current study, we assessed how dogs allocated their responding in a concurrent choice between food and petting. Dogs received five 5‐min sessions each. In Session 1, both food and petting were continuously delivered contingent on the dog being near the person providing the respective consequence. Across the next three sessions, we thinned the food schedule to a Fixed Interval (FI) 15‐s, FI 1‐min, and finally extinction. The fifth session reversed back to the original food contingency. We tested owned dogs in familiar (daycare) and unfamiliar (laboratory room) environments, and with their owner or a stranger as the person providing petting. In general, dogs preferred food to petting when food was readily available and all groups showed sensitivity to the thinning food schedule by decreasing their time allocation to food, although there were group and individual differences in the level of sensitivity. How dogs allocated their time with the petting alternative also varied. We found effects of context, familiarity of the person providing petting, and relative deprivation from social interaction on the amount of time dogs allocated to the petting alternative.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Feuerbacher, Erica N.
Wynne, Clive D. L.
spellingShingle Feuerbacher, Erica N.
Wynne, Clive D. L.
Most domestic dogs ( Canis lupus familiaris) prefer food to petting: population, context, and schedule effects in concurrent choice
author_facet Feuerbacher, Erica N.
Wynne, Clive D. L.
author_sort Feuerbacher, Erica N.
title Most domestic dogs ( Canis lupus familiaris) prefer food to petting: population, context, and schedule effects in concurrent choice
title_short Most domestic dogs ( Canis lupus familiaris) prefer food to petting: population, context, and schedule effects in concurrent choice
title_full Most domestic dogs ( Canis lupus familiaris) prefer food to petting: population, context, and schedule effects in concurrent choice
title_fullStr Most domestic dogs ( Canis lupus familiaris) prefer food to petting: population, context, and schedule effects in concurrent choice
title_full_unstemmed Most domestic dogs ( Canis lupus familiaris) prefer food to petting: population, context, and schedule effects in concurrent choice
title_sort most domestic dogs ( canis lupus familiaris) prefer food to petting: population, context, and schedule effects in concurrent choice
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2014
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jeab.81
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fjeab.81
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jeab.81
long_lat ENVELOPE(166.533,166.533,-70.883,-70.883)
geographic Elliot
geographic_facet Elliot
genre Canis lupus
genre_facet Canis lupus
op_source Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
volume 101, issue 3, page 385-405
ISSN 0022-5002 1938-3711
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.81
container_title Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
container_volume 101
container_issue 3
container_start_page 385
op_container_end_page 405
_version_ 1800749801599401984