The influences of catchment geomorphology and scale on runoff generation in a northern peatland complex

Abstract We computed daily discharge ( Q ) versus gross drainage area ( GDA ) regression analyses for the 2009 and 2010 growing seasons for six small to medium headwater catchments at a northern peatland complex in the James/Hudson Bay lowlands. Temporal dynamics of the daily goodness of fits ( R 2...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Hydrological Processes
Main Authors: Richardson, Murray, Ketcheson, Scott, Whittington, Peter, Price, Jonathan
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9322
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fhyp.9322
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/hyp.9322
id crwiley:10.1002/hyp.9322
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1002/hyp.9322 2024-06-02T08:07:54+00:00 The influences of catchment geomorphology and scale on runoff generation in a northern peatland complex Richardson, Murray Ketcheson, Scott Whittington, Peter Price, Jonathan 2012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9322 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fhyp.9322 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/hyp.9322 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Hydrological Processes volume 26, issue 12, page 1805-1817 ISSN 0885-6087 1099-1085 journal-article 2012 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9322 2024-05-03T11:13:36Z Abstract We computed daily discharge ( Q ) versus gross drainage area ( GDA ) regression analyses for the 2009 and 2010 growing seasons for six small to medium headwater catchments at a northern peatland complex in the James/Hudson Bay lowlands. Temporal dynamics of the daily goodness of fits ( R 2 ) between Q and GDA were then examined to identify the most relevant conceptual model of runoff generation in this landscape. We observed high R 2 values during low flow conditions (mean R 2 = 0.93 for 2009 and 2010). During wetter periods and in particular during large runoff events, the relationship degraded rapidly and consistently, suggesting differences in quickflow response among the gauged catchments. At low flows, the six catchments generated equivalent amounts of runoff (mm), leading to a strong Q–GDA relationship. During high flows, total growing season runoff increased systematically with GDA between 8 and 50 km 2 and then decreased with further increases in GDA . These differences were responsible for the observed breakdown in the daily Q–GDA relationships and also resulted in significant differences in total runoff among the six catchments during the wetter year. Quantitative landscape analysis using a 5‐m resolution Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) digital elevation model revealed that near‐stream zone characteristics vary systematically with scale in a manner that is consistent with the observed patterns of quickflow runoff response. In this northern peatland complex, fast‐responding flowpaths in the spatially discrete near‐stream zones may be the key determinant of catchment runoff efficiency at the small to medium (~10 to ~200 km 2 ) headwater catchment scales analysed here. Moreover, the relatively organized drainage patterns observed in this study are consistent with our understanding of ecohydrological feedbacks driving geomorphic evolution of northern peatlands. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Article in Journal/Newspaper Hudson Bay Wiley Online Library Hudson Hudson Bay Hydrological Processes 26 12 1805 1817
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract We computed daily discharge ( Q ) versus gross drainage area ( GDA ) regression analyses for the 2009 and 2010 growing seasons for six small to medium headwater catchments at a northern peatland complex in the James/Hudson Bay lowlands. Temporal dynamics of the daily goodness of fits ( R 2 ) between Q and GDA were then examined to identify the most relevant conceptual model of runoff generation in this landscape. We observed high R 2 values during low flow conditions (mean R 2 = 0.93 for 2009 and 2010). During wetter periods and in particular during large runoff events, the relationship degraded rapidly and consistently, suggesting differences in quickflow response among the gauged catchments. At low flows, the six catchments generated equivalent amounts of runoff (mm), leading to a strong Q–GDA relationship. During high flows, total growing season runoff increased systematically with GDA between 8 and 50 km 2 and then decreased with further increases in GDA . These differences were responsible for the observed breakdown in the daily Q–GDA relationships and also resulted in significant differences in total runoff among the six catchments during the wetter year. Quantitative landscape analysis using a 5‐m resolution Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) digital elevation model revealed that near‐stream zone characteristics vary systematically with scale in a manner that is consistent with the observed patterns of quickflow runoff response. In this northern peatland complex, fast‐responding flowpaths in the spatially discrete near‐stream zones may be the key determinant of catchment runoff efficiency at the small to medium (~10 to ~200 km 2 ) headwater catchment scales analysed here. Moreover, the relatively organized drainage patterns observed in this study are consistent with our understanding of ecohydrological feedbacks driving geomorphic evolution of northern peatlands. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Richardson, Murray
Ketcheson, Scott
Whittington, Peter
Price, Jonathan
spellingShingle Richardson, Murray
Ketcheson, Scott
Whittington, Peter
Price, Jonathan
The influences of catchment geomorphology and scale on runoff generation in a northern peatland complex
author_facet Richardson, Murray
Ketcheson, Scott
Whittington, Peter
Price, Jonathan
author_sort Richardson, Murray
title The influences of catchment geomorphology and scale on runoff generation in a northern peatland complex
title_short The influences of catchment geomorphology and scale on runoff generation in a northern peatland complex
title_full The influences of catchment geomorphology and scale on runoff generation in a northern peatland complex
title_fullStr The influences of catchment geomorphology and scale on runoff generation in a northern peatland complex
title_full_unstemmed The influences of catchment geomorphology and scale on runoff generation in a northern peatland complex
title_sort influences of catchment geomorphology and scale on runoff generation in a northern peatland complex
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2012
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9322
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fhyp.9322
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/hyp.9322
geographic Hudson
Hudson Bay
geographic_facet Hudson
Hudson Bay
genre Hudson Bay
genre_facet Hudson Bay
op_source Hydrological Processes
volume 26, issue 12, page 1805-1817
ISSN 0885-6087 1099-1085
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9322
container_title Hydrological Processes
container_volume 26
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1805
op_container_end_page 1817
_version_ 1800753034098114560