Towards automated ‘Ground truth’ snow measurements—a review of operational and new measurement methods for Sweden, Norway, and Finland

Abstract Manual snow measurements are becoming increasingly expensive and climate‐change‐imposed snow alterations are affecting run‐off and frost patterns; snow observations are included in run‐off modelling, making reliable snow observations of utmost importance. Multiple new and modified ground‐ba...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Hydrological Processes
Main Authors: Lundberg, Angela, Granlund, Nils, Gustafsson, David
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7658
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fhyp.7658
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/hyp.7658
id crwiley:10.1002/hyp.7658
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1002/hyp.7658 2024-09-15T18:02:40+00:00 Towards automated ‘Ground truth’ snow measurements—a review of operational and new measurement methods for Sweden, Norway, and Finland Lundberg, Angela Granlund, Nils Gustafsson, David 2010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7658 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fhyp.7658 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/hyp.7658 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Hydrological Processes volume 24, issue 14, page 1955-1970 ISSN 0885-6087 1099-1085 journal-article 2010 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7658 2024-07-23T04:16:04Z Abstract Manual snow measurements are becoming increasingly expensive and climate‐change‐imposed snow alterations are affecting run‐off and frost patterns; snow observations are included in run‐off modelling, making reliable snow observations of utmost importance. Multiple new and modified ground‐based techniques for monitoring snow depth, density, snow water equivalent (SWE), wetness, and layering have been tested over the last decade, justifying a review of such methods. Techniques based on snow mass, electrical properties, attenuation of radioactivity, and other miscellaneous properties are reviewed. The following sensors seem suitable for registration of temporal variations: ultrasonic (depth) and terrestrial laser scanning (depth), several snow pillows at the same location (SWE), Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory/Natural Resources Conservation Service weighing sensor (SWE), Snowpower (depth, density, SWE, and wetness), active and passive (cosmic) γ‐ray attenuation (SWE), and adjusted time domain reflectometry probes (density and wetness). Ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) is, depending on the design and operation modes, suitable for different purposes; when arrays of antennas are pulled by a snowmobile, the technique is suitable for monitoring of spatial variations in depth, density, and SWE for dry snow. Techniques are under development, which will hopefully improve the accuracy for wet snow measurements. Frequency‐modulated continuous wave GPRs seem fit for measurement of snow layering. Some suggested techniques are not operational yet. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Article in Journal/Newspaper Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory Wiley Online Library Hydrological Processes 24 14 1955 1970
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract Manual snow measurements are becoming increasingly expensive and climate‐change‐imposed snow alterations are affecting run‐off and frost patterns; snow observations are included in run‐off modelling, making reliable snow observations of utmost importance. Multiple new and modified ground‐based techniques for monitoring snow depth, density, snow water equivalent (SWE), wetness, and layering have been tested over the last decade, justifying a review of such methods. Techniques based on snow mass, electrical properties, attenuation of radioactivity, and other miscellaneous properties are reviewed. The following sensors seem suitable for registration of temporal variations: ultrasonic (depth) and terrestrial laser scanning (depth), several snow pillows at the same location (SWE), Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory/Natural Resources Conservation Service weighing sensor (SWE), Snowpower (depth, density, SWE, and wetness), active and passive (cosmic) γ‐ray attenuation (SWE), and adjusted time domain reflectometry probes (density and wetness). Ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) is, depending on the design and operation modes, suitable for different purposes; when arrays of antennas are pulled by a snowmobile, the technique is suitable for monitoring of spatial variations in depth, density, and SWE for dry snow. Techniques are under development, which will hopefully improve the accuracy for wet snow measurements. Frequency‐modulated continuous wave GPRs seem fit for measurement of snow layering. Some suggested techniques are not operational yet. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Lundberg, Angela
Granlund, Nils
Gustafsson, David
spellingShingle Lundberg, Angela
Granlund, Nils
Gustafsson, David
Towards automated ‘Ground truth’ snow measurements—a review of operational and new measurement methods for Sweden, Norway, and Finland
author_facet Lundberg, Angela
Granlund, Nils
Gustafsson, David
author_sort Lundberg, Angela
title Towards automated ‘Ground truth’ snow measurements—a review of operational and new measurement methods for Sweden, Norway, and Finland
title_short Towards automated ‘Ground truth’ snow measurements—a review of operational and new measurement methods for Sweden, Norway, and Finland
title_full Towards automated ‘Ground truth’ snow measurements—a review of operational and new measurement methods for Sweden, Norway, and Finland
title_fullStr Towards automated ‘Ground truth’ snow measurements—a review of operational and new measurement methods for Sweden, Norway, and Finland
title_full_unstemmed Towards automated ‘Ground truth’ snow measurements—a review of operational and new measurement methods for Sweden, Norway, and Finland
title_sort towards automated ‘ground truth’ snow measurements—a review of operational and new measurement methods for sweden, norway, and finland
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2010
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7658
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fhyp.7658
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/hyp.7658
genre Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory
genre_facet Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory
op_source Hydrological Processes
volume 24, issue 14, page 1955-1970
ISSN 0885-6087 1099-1085
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7658
container_title Hydrological Processes
container_volume 24
container_issue 14
container_start_page 1955
op_container_end_page 1970
_version_ 1810440097334558720