A rational explanation of cross‐profile morphology for glacial valleys and of glacial valley development

Abstract The fact that the cross‐profile of the glacial valley could be well approximated by parabolas (Y = aX b , b = 2.0) is explained by the variation principle, assuming that the glacier erosion works towards minimizing thefriction between ice and bedrock. The variation principle proves that the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
Main Authors: Hirano, Masasgige, Aniya, Masamu
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 1988
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/esp.3290130805
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fesp.3290130805
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/esp.3290130805
id crwiley:10.1002/esp.3290130805
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1002/esp.3290130805 2024-09-15T17:42:07+00:00 A rational explanation of cross‐profile morphology for glacial valleys and of glacial valley development Hirano, Masasgige Aniya, Masamu 1988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/esp.3290130805 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fesp.3290130805 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/esp.3290130805 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Earth Surface Processes and Landforms volume 13, issue 8, page 707-716 ISSN 0197-9337 1096-9837 journal-article 1988 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3290130805 2024-08-20T04:17:48Z Abstract The fact that the cross‐profile of the glacial valley could be well approximated by parabolas (Y = aX b , b = 2.0) is explained by the variation principle, assuming that the glacier erosion works towards minimizing thefriction between ice and bedrock. The variation principle proves that the ideal or fully‐developed morphology of the glacial valley should be a catenary, the curve which a chain hanging from two fixed points forms. Maclaurin's series expansion of the catenary equation shows that a parabola is a very good approximation of the catenary; hence, the good approximation of the cross‐profile by parabolas. Different catenaries are generated by changing the form ratio (depth/rim width) and are then approximated by Y = aX b by the method of last‐squares. The b values obtained become only fractionally larger than 2.0 with invreasing form ratios of up to 1.0, indicating that b values would range, in practice, between 1.0 and about 2.0 Two types of trend in the relationship between b values and the form ratio were obtained from several glaciers. For one type the b value becomes larger with increasing form ratios, and for the other the opposite. The first type is called the Rocky Mountain model after its source of data and represents overdeepening of the glacial valley development. The second type is caalled the Patagonia‐Antarctica model, representing a widening, instead of a deepening, process of development. These differences are attributed to the nature of the glaciers which produced these valleys, i.e. alpine glaciers and continental ice sheets. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctica Wiley Online Library Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 13 8 707 716
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract The fact that the cross‐profile of the glacial valley could be well approximated by parabolas (Y = aX b , b = 2.0) is explained by the variation principle, assuming that the glacier erosion works towards minimizing thefriction between ice and bedrock. The variation principle proves that the ideal or fully‐developed morphology of the glacial valley should be a catenary, the curve which a chain hanging from two fixed points forms. Maclaurin's series expansion of the catenary equation shows that a parabola is a very good approximation of the catenary; hence, the good approximation of the cross‐profile by parabolas. Different catenaries are generated by changing the form ratio (depth/rim width) and are then approximated by Y = aX b by the method of last‐squares. The b values obtained become only fractionally larger than 2.0 with invreasing form ratios of up to 1.0, indicating that b values would range, in practice, between 1.0 and about 2.0 Two types of trend in the relationship between b values and the form ratio were obtained from several glaciers. For one type the b value becomes larger with increasing form ratios, and for the other the opposite. The first type is called the Rocky Mountain model after its source of data and represents overdeepening of the glacial valley development. The second type is caalled the Patagonia‐Antarctica model, representing a widening, instead of a deepening, process of development. These differences are attributed to the nature of the glaciers which produced these valleys, i.e. alpine glaciers and continental ice sheets.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Hirano, Masasgige
Aniya, Masamu
spellingShingle Hirano, Masasgige
Aniya, Masamu
A rational explanation of cross‐profile morphology for glacial valleys and of glacial valley development
author_facet Hirano, Masasgige
Aniya, Masamu
author_sort Hirano, Masasgige
title A rational explanation of cross‐profile morphology for glacial valleys and of glacial valley development
title_short A rational explanation of cross‐profile morphology for glacial valleys and of glacial valley development
title_full A rational explanation of cross‐profile morphology for glacial valleys and of glacial valley development
title_fullStr A rational explanation of cross‐profile morphology for glacial valleys and of glacial valley development
title_full_unstemmed A rational explanation of cross‐profile morphology for glacial valleys and of glacial valley development
title_sort rational explanation of cross‐profile morphology for glacial valleys and of glacial valley development
publisher Wiley
publishDate 1988
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/esp.3290130805
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fesp.3290130805
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/esp.3290130805
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
op_source Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
volume 13, issue 8, page 707-716
ISSN 0197-9337 1096-9837
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3290130805
container_title Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
container_volume 13
container_issue 8
container_start_page 707
op_container_end_page 716
_version_ 1810488550028738560