Field and laboratory studies on alpine soil erodibility, southern Rocky Mountains, Colorado

Abstract Soil erodibility has been studied on the alpine tundra of Trail Ridge in the southern Rocky Mountains, Colorado. Field experiments were conducted using a portable rainfall simulator to estimate an erodibility index (grams of detached soil per unit area) at 71 sites. The index determined on...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
Main Author: Summer, Rebecca M.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 1982
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/esp.3290070304
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fesp.3290070304
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/esp.3290070304
id crwiley:10.1002/esp.3290070304
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1002/esp.3290070304 2024-09-15T18:39:48+00:00 Field and laboratory studies on alpine soil erodibility, southern Rocky Mountains, Colorado Summer, Rebecca M. 1982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/esp.3290070304 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fesp.3290070304 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/esp.3290070304 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Earth Surface Processes and Landforms volume 7, issue 3, page 253-266 ISSN 0197-9337 1096-9837 journal-article 1982 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3290070304 2024-08-13T04:14:36Z Abstract Soil erodibility has been studied on the alpine tundra of Trail Ridge in the southern Rocky Mountains, Colorado. Field experiments were conducted using a portable rainfall simulator to estimate an erodibility index (grams of detached soil per unit area) at 71 sites. The index determined on eight soil types allowed discrimination of a high erodibility group (mean index of 18.9 g), moderate or transitional group (mean index of 10.1 g), and one low group (mean index of 4.5 g). Laboratory measurements of physical propertiesMdashtexture, water absorption capacity, organic carbon, and aggregationMdashwere compared with the erodibility index and results of simple and multiple regressions showed that 29 per cent of the variance in erodibility is explained by the measured variables, the strongest correlation (r =0.42) being associated with aggregation. Unexplained variability (71 per cent) may be due in part to unmeasured soil properties, non‐linearity in the data, random processes, bias, and experimental error. These correlations represent a beginning in understanding factors influencing alpine soil erodibility. The results suggest that field measurement is still the most satisfactory method of estimating an erodibility index and that laboratory surrogates for this index are not readily applicable in this environment. Article in Journal/Newspaper Tundra Wiley Online Library Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 7 3 253 266
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract Soil erodibility has been studied on the alpine tundra of Trail Ridge in the southern Rocky Mountains, Colorado. Field experiments were conducted using a portable rainfall simulator to estimate an erodibility index (grams of detached soil per unit area) at 71 sites. The index determined on eight soil types allowed discrimination of a high erodibility group (mean index of 18.9 g), moderate or transitional group (mean index of 10.1 g), and one low group (mean index of 4.5 g). Laboratory measurements of physical propertiesMdashtexture, water absorption capacity, organic carbon, and aggregationMdashwere compared with the erodibility index and results of simple and multiple regressions showed that 29 per cent of the variance in erodibility is explained by the measured variables, the strongest correlation (r =0.42) being associated with aggregation. Unexplained variability (71 per cent) may be due in part to unmeasured soil properties, non‐linearity in the data, random processes, bias, and experimental error. These correlations represent a beginning in understanding factors influencing alpine soil erodibility. The results suggest that field measurement is still the most satisfactory method of estimating an erodibility index and that laboratory surrogates for this index are not readily applicable in this environment.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Summer, Rebecca M.
spellingShingle Summer, Rebecca M.
Field and laboratory studies on alpine soil erodibility, southern Rocky Mountains, Colorado
author_facet Summer, Rebecca M.
author_sort Summer, Rebecca M.
title Field and laboratory studies on alpine soil erodibility, southern Rocky Mountains, Colorado
title_short Field and laboratory studies on alpine soil erodibility, southern Rocky Mountains, Colorado
title_full Field and laboratory studies on alpine soil erodibility, southern Rocky Mountains, Colorado
title_fullStr Field and laboratory studies on alpine soil erodibility, southern Rocky Mountains, Colorado
title_full_unstemmed Field and laboratory studies on alpine soil erodibility, southern Rocky Mountains, Colorado
title_sort field and laboratory studies on alpine soil erodibility, southern rocky mountains, colorado
publisher Wiley
publishDate 1982
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/esp.3290070304
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fesp.3290070304
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/esp.3290070304
genre Tundra
genre_facet Tundra
op_source Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
volume 7, issue 3, page 253-266
ISSN 0197-9337 1096-9837
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3290070304
container_title Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
container_volume 7
container_issue 3
container_start_page 253
op_container_end_page 266
_version_ 1810484150093742080