Impact of Different Surfactants and their Mixtures on Methane‐Hydrate Formation

Abstract Gas hydrates can be used as a potential means for natural gas storage. Design of a gas‐hydrate‐based unit requires accurate knowledge of hydrate‐formation kinetics especially in the presence of promoters. In this study, the effects of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), hexa decyl trimethyl ammon...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energy Technology
Main Authors: Fazlali, Alireza, Kazemi, Seyedeh‐Atieh, Keshavarz‐Moraveji, Mostafa, Mohammadi, Amir H.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ente.201300041
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fente.201300041
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ente.201300041
id crwiley:10.1002/ente.201300041
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1002/ente.201300041 2024-05-19T07:44:00+00:00 Impact of Different Surfactants and their Mixtures on Methane‐Hydrate Formation Fazlali, Alireza Kazemi, Seyedeh‐Atieh Keshavarz‐Moraveji, Mostafa Mohammadi, Amir H. 2013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ente.201300041 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fente.201300041 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ente.201300041 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Energy Technology volume 1, issue 8, page 471-477 ISSN 2194-4288 2194-4296 General Energy journal-article 2013 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.201300041 2024-04-22T07:33:18Z Abstract Gas hydrates can be used as a potential means for natural gas storage. Design of a gas‐hydrate‐based unit requires accurate knowledge of hydrate‐formation kinetics especially in the presence of promoters. In this study, the effects of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), hexa decyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (HTABr), polyoxy ethylene(20) cetyl ether (Brij‐58) and mixtures of SDS with HTABr and Brij‐58 have been investigated to determine their influence on the methane‐hydrate‐formation kinetics and thermodynamics. The study on the kinetics of hydrate formation is focused on the induction time and hydrate‐formation rate. It is found that induction time of hydrate formation in the presence of a promoter is reduced considerably for each test compared with a pure water test. The minimum value of the induction time is found for a mixture of SDS (500 ppm) with HTABr (700 ppm). All of the surfactants and their mixtures can be designated as hydrate‐formation promoters in the concentration ranges studied in the present work and can increase the hydrate‐formation rate. SDS at a concentration of 500 ppm is determined to be the best hydrate‐formation promoter among the surfactants tested. The percent conversion of methane to hydrate is increased in the presence of these surfactants at the end of hydrate formation. The maximum value of the conversion is observed for the 500 ppm concentration of SDS. The results demonstrate that these surfactants and their corresponding mixtures have no significant effect on the thermodynamics of methane hydrate formation. Article in Journal/Newspaper Methane hydrate Wiley Online Library Energy Technology 1 8 471 477
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
topic General Energy
spellingShingle General Energy
Fazlali, Alireza
Kazemi, Seyedeh‐Atieh
Keshavarz‐Moraveji, Mostafa
Mohammadi, Amir H.
Impact of Different Surfactants and their Mixtures on Methane‐Hydrate Formation
topic_facet General Energy
description Abstract Gas hydrates can be used as a potential means for natural gas storage. Design of a gas‐hydrate‐based unit requires accurate knowledge of hydrate‐formation kinetics especially in the presence of promoters. In this study, the effects of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), hexa decyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (HTABr), polyoxy ethylene(20) cetyl ether (Brij‐58) and mixtures of SDS with HTABr and Brij‐58 have been investigated to determine their influence on the methane‐hydrate‐formation kinetics and thermodynamics. The study on the kinetics of hydrate formation is focused on the induction time and hydrate‐formation rate. It is found that induction time of hydrate formation in the presence of a promoter is reduced considerably for each test compared with a pure water test. The minimum value of the induction time is found for a mixture of SDS (500 ppm) with HTABr (700 ppm). All of the surfactants and their mixtures can be designated as hydrate‐formation promoters in the concentration ranges studied in the present work and can increase the hydrate‐formation rate. SDS at a concentration of 500 ppm is determined to be the best hydrate‐formation promoter among the surfactants tested. The percent conversion of methane to hydrate is increased in the presence of these surfactants at the end of hydrate formation. The maximum value of the conversion is observed for the 500 ppm concentration of SDS. The results demonstrate that these surfactants and their corresponding mixtures have no significant effect on the thermodynamics of methane hydrate formation.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Fazlali, Alireza
Kazemi, Seyedeh‐Atieh
Keshavarz‐Moraveji, Mostafa
Mohammadi, Amir H.
author_facet Fazlali, Alireza
Kazemi, Seyedeh‐Atieh
Keshavarz‐Moraveji, Mostafa
Mohammadi, Amir H.
author_sort Fazlali, Alireza
title Impact of Different Surfactants and their Mixtures on Methane‐Hydrate Formation
title_short Impact of Different Surfactants and their Mixtures on Methane‐Hydrate Formation
title_full Impact of Different Surfactants and their Mixtures on Methane‐Hydrate Formation
title_fullStr Impact of Different Surfactants and their Mixtures on Methane‐Hydrate Formation
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Different Surfactants and their Mixtures on Methane‐Hydrate Formation
title_sort impact of different surfactants and their mixtures on methane‐hydrate formation
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2013
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ente.201300041
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fente.201300041
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ente.201300041
genre Methane hydrate
genre_facet Methane hydrate
op_source Energy Technology
volume 1, issue 8, page 471-477
ISSN 2194-4288 2194-4296
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.201300041
container_title Energy Technology
container_volume 1
container_issue 8
container_start_page 471
op_container_end_page 477
_version_ 1799483764007501824