Co‐benefits and conflicts in alternative stormwater planning: Blue versus green infrastructure?

Abstract Blue–green infrastructure (BGI) is often promoted for its co‐benefits and multifunctionality. However, this infrastructure is repeatedly planned, implemented and researched almost entirely based on the goals of stormwater management. Thus, more knowledge is required about how co‐benefits ar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental Policy and Governance
Main Author: Kvamsås, Hanna
Other Authors: Universitetet i Bergen
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eet.2017
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/eet.2017
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/eet.2017
id crwiley:10.1002/eet.2017
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1002/eet.2017 2024-09-15T18:39:27+00:00 Co‐benefits and conflicts in alternative stormwater planning: Blue versus green infrastructure? Kvamsås, Hanna Universitetet i Bergen 2022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eet.2017 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/eet.2017 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/eet.2017 en eng Wiley http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Environmental Policy and Governance volume 33, issue 3, page 232-244 ISSN 1756-932X 1756-9338 journal-article 2022 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.2017 2024-09-05T05:08:27Z Abstract Blue–green infrastructure (BGI) is often promoted for its co‐benefits and multifunctionality. However, this infrastructure is repeatedly planned, implemented and researched almost entirely based on the goals of stormwater management. Thus, more knowledge is required about how co‐benefits are perceived and actioned by planning actors. By investigating co‐benefits from a value perspective, this paper will contribute to the ongoing debate on how stormwater planning actors address the potential co‐benefits and conflicts in the planning and implementation of BGI. The data are derived from policy document analyses and interviews with municipal and private planning actors in Bergen and Tromsø, Norway. The paper argues that municipal water actors are motivated to implement BGI beyond stormwater management goals and approach co‐benefits and holistic stormwater management as an ideal in stormwater planning. However, the tensions and conflicts between the co‐benefits become more evident in the actual implementation of BGI. The paper finds that when holistic BGI implementation is initiated by the municipal water actors, the stormwater management aspects dominate the BGI implementation. Finally, the paper concludes that even though blue and green values and interests are often conflicted in the implementation of BGI, urban stormwater planning is in the process of developing a blue–green value set based on the potential synergies of co‐benefits. The paper therefore empirically illustrates how collective values and interests can develop and unfold across sectors and professional disciplines in BGI planning. Article in Journal/Newspaper Tromsø Wiley Online Library Environmental Policy and Governance 33 3 232 244
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract Blue–green infrastructure (BGI) is often promoted for its co‐benefits and multifunctionality. However, this infrastructure is repeatedly planned, implemented and researched almost entirely based on the goals of stormwater management. Thus, more knowledge is required about how co‐benefits are perceived and actioned by planning actors. By investigating co‐benefits from a value perspective, this paper will contribute to the ongoing debate on how stormwater planning actors address the potential co‐benefits and conflicts in the planning and implementation of BGI. The data are derived from policy document analyses and interviews with municipal and private planning actors in Bergen and Tromsø, Norway. The paper argues that municipal water actors are motivated to implement BGI beyond stormwater management goals and approach co‐benefits and holistic stormwater management as an ideal in stormwater planning. However, the tensions and conflicts between the co‐benefits become more evident in the actual implementation of BGI. The paper finds that when holistic BGI implementation is initiated by the municipal water actors, the stormwater management aspects dominate the BGI implementation. Finally, the paper concludes that even though blue and green values and interests are often conflicted in the implementation of BGI, urban stormwater planning is in the process of developing a blue–green value set based on the potential synergies of co‐benefits. The paper therefore empirically illustrates how collective values and interests can develop and unfold across sectors and professional disciplines in BGI planning.
author2 Universitetet i Bergen
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Kvamsås, Hanna
spellingShingle Kvamsås, Hanna
Co‐benefits and conflicts in alternative stormwater planning: Blue versus green infrastructure?
author_facet Kvamsås, Hanna
author_sort Kvamsås, Hanna
title Co‐benefits and conflicts in alternative stormwater planning: Blue versus green infrastructure?
title_short Co‐benefits and conflicts in alternative stormwater planning: Blue versus green infrastructure?
title_full Co‐benefits and conflicts in alternative stormwater planning: Blue versus green infrastructure?
title_fullStr Co‐benefits and conflicts in alternative stormwater planning: Blue versus green infrastructure?
title_full_unstemmed Co‐benefits and conflicts in alternative stormwater planning: Blue versus green infrastructure?
title_sort co‐benefits and conflicts in alternative stormwater planning: blue versus green infrastructure?
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2022
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eet.2017
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/eet.2017
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/eet.2017
genre Tromsø
genre_facet Tromsø
op_source Environmental Policy and Governance
volume 33, issue 3, page 232-244
ISSN 1756-932X 1756-9338
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.2017
container_title Environmental Policy and Governance
container_volume 33
container_issue 3
container_start_page 232
op_container_end_page 244
_version_ 1810483816798617600