Environmental DNA of Antarctic krill ( Euphausia superba): Measuring DNA fragmentation adds a temporal aspect to quantitative surveys

• Published in: Environmental DNA
• Main Authors: Suter, Leonie, Wotherspoon, Simon, Kawaguchi, So, King, Rob, MacDonald, Anna J., Nester, Georgia M., Polanowski, Andrea M., Raymond, Ben, Deagle, Bruce E.
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2023
• Subjects: Antarctic; Southern Ocean; Antarc*; Antarctic Krill; Euphausia superba
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/edn3.394; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/edn3.394; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/edn3.394

Abstract Antarctic krill ( Euphausia superba ) is a keystone species in the Southern Ocean ecosystem, and monitoring its distribution and abundance is crucial for the sustainable management of expanding fisheries targeting the species. Environmental DNA (eDNA)‐based monitoring could complement conventional krill surveys, but its applicability is limited by a lack of knowledge on eDNA persistence and decay in the Southern Ocean. We aimed to develop a method that can not only quantify Antarctic krill eDNA, but also estimate a relative time since this eDNA was shed (“recent” vs “older”). Three species‐specific qPCR markers targeting the mitochondrial 16S region were developed, and the eDNA decay characteristics of these markers were determined through tank experiments. Krill eDNA was partially degraded in all samples, even when krill were present. Marker concentrations decreased exponentially at similar rates after krill removal, with initial relative abundances maintained across the three markers. Over time, the concentration of the longest marker decreased faster, changing the relative abundances of the markers, and allowing discrimination of more recent samples from more degraded older samples. We employed this new method to quantify Antarctic krill eDNA collected across a 4800 km Southern Ocean transect, and estimated the age of the eDNA in these samples based on the relative abundance of markers, adding a temporal aspect to a quantitative eDNA survey. We also compared a Euphausiid‐specific metabarcoding marker to the qPCR method to assess sensitivity in detecting Antarctic krill eDNA. While these new eDNA methods should be evaluated against existing non‐molecular survey methods, they could add an important novel, dynamic layer of information to future krill surveys. Our method could not only determine where Antarctic krill eDNA is present but shed light on how they may be using certain habitats, expanding our understanding of this important species’ life cycle and contributing to more accurate abundance and ...