An evaluation of the efficacy of shell hash for the mitigation of intertidal sediment acidification

Abstract Our objectives were twofold: (1) to determine whether the addition of shell hash to intertidal sediments would mitigate porewater acidification and (2) whether its effectiveness was dependent on the type of sediment as described by organic matter (OM) and particle grain size (PGS). Field ex...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecosphere
Main Authors: Doyle, Bridget, Bendell, Leah I.
Other Authors: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4003
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ecs2.4003
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/ecs2.4003
https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ecs2.4003
id crwiley:10.1002/ecs2.4003
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1002/ecs2.4003 2024-09-15T18:28:16+00:00 An evaluation of the efficacy of shell hash for the mitigation of intertidal sediment acidification Doyle, Bridget Bendell, Leah I. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada 2022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4003 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ecs2.4003 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/ecs2.4003 https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ecs2.4003 en eng Wiley http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Ecosphere volume 13, issue 3 ISSN 2150-8925 2150-8925 journal-article 2022 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4003 2024-07-30T04:20:50Z Abstract Our objectives were twofold: (1) to determine whether the addition of shell hash to intertidal sediments would mitigate porewater acidification and (2) whether its effectiveness was dependent on the type of sediment as described by organic matter (OM) and particle grain size (PGS). Field experiments were conducted at two sites within Burrard Inlet, British Columbia; Maplewood Mudflats (MM), high in OM and silt and Whey‐ah‐Wichen/Cates Park (WAW), low in OM and an equal PGS among very coarse, coarse, fine sand, and silt. Shell hash was added to triplicate treatment plots matched with triplicate controls at each site and porewater pH measured at flood and ebb tide over eight tidal cycles. Sampling occurred during June and July when tidal cycles were at their maximum inundation and exposure. Porewater pH was significantly greater for ebb versus flood tide and also between sites with MM significantly lower (7.59) as compared to WAW (8.03). Although pH was not mitigated by the shell hash, for WAW, variation in pH was reduced as compared to MM, as indicated by coefficients of variation over the 6‐week sampling period. We suggest that the application of shell hash to reduce the impact of ocean acidification (OA) on intertidal sediments will be site dependent. The combined processes of eutrophication in sediments with high OM and respiration of infauna, especially at high densities, could act in concert with OA to create an intertidal region unsuitable for bivalve larvae settlement and development. Article in Journal/Newspaper Ocean acidification Wiley Online Library Ecosphere 13 3
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract Our objectives were twofold: (1) to determine whether the addition of shell hash to intertidal sediments would mitigate porewater acidification and (2) whether its effectiveness was dependent on the type of sediment as described by organic matter (OM) and particle grain size (PGS). Field experiments were conducted at two sites within Burrard Inlet, British Columbia; Maplewood Mudflats (MM), high in OM and silt and Whey‐ah‐Wichen/Cates Park (WAW), low in OM and an equal PGS among very coarse, coarse, fine sand, and silt. Shell hash was added to triplicate treatment plots matched with triplicate controls at each site and porewater pH measured at flood and ebb tide over eight tidal cycles. Sampling occurred during June and July when tidal cycles were at their maximum inundation and exposure. Porewater pH was significantly greater for ebb versus flood tide and also between sites with MM significantly lower (7.59) as compared to WAW (8.03). Although pH was not mitigated by the shell hash, for WAW, variation in pH was reduced as compared to MM, as indicated by coefficients of variation over the 6‐week sampling period. We suggest that the application of shell hash to reduce the impact of ocean acidification (OA) on intertidal sediments will be site dependent. The combined processes of eutrophication in sediments with high OM and respiration of infauna, especially at high densities, could act in concert with OA to create an intertidal region unsuitable for bivalve larvae settlement and development.
author2 Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Doyle, Bridget
Bendell, Leah I.
spellingShingle Doyle, Bridget
Bendell, Leah I.
An evaluation of the efficacy of shell hash for the mitigation of intertidal sediment acidification
author_facet Doyle, Bridget
Bendell, Leah I.
author_sort Doyle, Bridget
title An evaluation of the efficacy of shell hash for the mitigation of intertidal sediment acidification
title_short An evaluation of the efficacy of shell hash for the mitigation of intertidal sediment acidification
title_full An evaluation of the efficacy of shell hash for the mitigation of intertidal sediment acidification
title_fullStr An evaluation of the efficacy of shell hash for the mitigation of intertidal sediment acidification
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of the efficacy of shell hash for the mitigation of intertidal sediment acidification
title_sort evaluation of the efficacy of shell hash for the mitigation of intertidal sediment acidification
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2022
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4003
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ecs2.4003
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/ecs2.4003
https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ecs2.4003
genre Ocean acidification
genre_facet Ocean acidification
op_source Ecosphere
volume 13, issue 3
ISSN 2150-8925 2150-8925
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4003
container_title Ecosphere
container_volume 13
container_issue 3
_version_ 1810469612829016064