Individual responses to novel predation risk and the emergence of a landscape of fear

• Published in: Ecosphere
• Main Authors: Perry, Thomas A., Laforge, Michel P., Vander Wal, Eric, Knight, Thomas W., McLoughlin, Philip D.
• Other Authors: Parks Canada, Canada Foundation for Innovation, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2020
• Subjects: Canada; Gros Morne National Park; Alces alces
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3216; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fecs2.3216; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ecs2.3216; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/ecs2.3216; https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ecs2.3216

Abstract Elucidating changes in prey behavior in response to a novel predator is key to understanding how individuals acclimate to shifting predation regimes. Such responses are predicted to vary among individuals as a function of the level of risk to which individuals are exposed, temporal changes in risk, and landscape‐mediated changes in perceived risk. We tested how GPS‐tracked moose ( Alces alces , n = 19) responded to an emerging risk landscape with the introduction of hunting to a naïve population (large‐scale reduction experiment in Gros Morne National Park, Canada). We predicted that predation risk associated with hunters would influence moose habitat selection: Avoidance responses would be stronger during the day when hunting was allowed, and moose would learn to avoid risky locations which would strengthen in successive years for survivors occupying overall riskier home ranges. We found that moose avoided areas associated with a high risk of encounters with hunters but did not alter selection patterns between day and night. We did not find evidence of moose reacting more strongly to emerging risk as a function of risk within their home range. Moose did not increase their avoidance of areas associated with hunter risk across years but over time survivors selected non‐hunted refuge areas more frequently. Our results suggest that while moose did not adjust fine‐scale habitat selection through time to increased hunting risk, they did adjust selection at broader scales (based on proportions of hunter‐free habitat included in home range relative to study area). This finding supports the hypothesis that habitat selection at larger spatio‐temporal scales may reflect behavioral responses to a population’s most important limiting factors, which may not be apparent at finer scales.