Investigating the influence of two different flow routing algorithms on soil–water–vegetation interactions using the dynamic ecosystem model LPJ‐GUESS

Abstract This paper compares two flow routing algorithms' influences on ecohydrological estimations in a northern peatland catchment, within the framework of an arctic‐enabled version of the dynamic ecosystem model LPJ‐GUESS. Accurate hydrological estimations are needed to fully capture vegetat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecohydrology
Main Authors: Tang, Jing, Miller, Paul A., Crill, Patrick M., Olin, Stefan, Pilesjö, Petter
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eco.1526
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Feco.1526
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/eco.1526
id crwiley:10.1002/eco.1526
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1002/eco.1526 2024-09-15T18:30:10+00:00 Investigating the influence of two different flow routing algorithms on soil–water–vegetation interactions using the dynamic ecosystem model LPJ‐GUESS Tang, Jing Miller, Paul A. Crill, Patrick M. Olin, Stefan Pilesjö, Petter 2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eco.1526 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Feco.1526 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/eco.1526 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Ecohydrology volume 8, issue 4, page 570-583 ISSN 1936-0584 1936-0592 journal-article 2014 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1526 2024-07-30T04:23:55Z Abstract This paper compares two flow routing algorithms' influences on ecohydrological estimations in a northern peatland catchment, within the framework of an arctic‐enabled version of the dynamic ecosystem model LPJ‐GUESS. Accurate hydrological estimations are needed to fully capture vegetation dynamics and carbon fluxes in the subarctic peatland enviroment. A previously proposed distributed hydrological method based on the single flow (SF) algorithm extracted topographic indices has shown to improve runoff estimations in LPJ‐GUESS. This paper investigates model performance differences caused by two flow routing algorithms, and importantly both permafrost processes and peatland hydrology are included in the model. The newly developed triangular form‐based multiple flow (TFM) is selected due to its improved consideration of flow continuity and more realistic flow estimation over flat surfaces. A variety of measured data is included to assess both hydrological and ecological accuracy, and the results demonstrate that the choice of flow algorithm does matter for mesoscale ecohydrology applications. The allowance of flow convergence and consideration of flow partition differences from different terrain forms in the TFM algorithm yield better correspondence with the observed hydrological processes and also carbon fluxes. By directing flow to only one downslope cell together with its poorer depiction of flow over flat areas, the SF algorithm can result in too high runoff estimations for low‐flat regions and overestimate carbon uptake and release in the peatland. The results of this study also highlight the need for care when selecting flow routing algorithms for biogeochemical estimations, especially within hydrologically and climatically sensitive environments. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Article in Journal/Newspaper permafrost Subarctic Wiley Online Library Ecohydrology 8 4 570 583
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract This paper compares two flow routing algorithms' influences on ecohydrological estimations in a northern peatland catchment, within the framework of an arctic‐enabled version of the dynamic ecosystem model LPJ‐GUESS. Accurate hydrological estimations are needed to fully capture vegetation dynamics and carbon fluxes in the subarctic peatland enviroment. A previously proposed distributed hydrological method based on the single flow (SF) algorithm extracted topographic indices has shown to improve runoff estimations in LPJ‐GUESS. This paper investigates model performance differences caused by two flow routing algorithms, and importantly both permafrost processes and peatland hydrology are included in the model. The newly developed triangular form‐based multiple flow (TFM) is selected due to its improved consideration of flow continuity and more realistic flow estimation over flat surfaces. A variety of measured data is included to assess both hydrological and ecological accuracy, and the results demonstrate that the choice of flow algorithm does matter for mesoscale ecohydrology applications. The allowance of flow convergence and consideration of flow partition differences from different terrain forms in the TFM algorithm yield better correspondence with the observed hydrological processes and also carbon fluxes. By directing flow to only one downslope cell together with its poorer depiction of flow over flat areas, the SF algorithm can result in too high runoff estimations for low‐flat regions and overestimate carbon uptake and release in the peatland. The results of this study also highlight the need for care when selecting flow routing algorithms for biogeochemical estimations, especially within hydrologically and climatically sensitive environments. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Tang, Jing
Miller, Paul A.
Crill, Patrick M.
Olin, Stefan
Pilesjö, Petter
spellingShingle Tang, Jing
Miller, Paul A.
Crill, Patrick M.
Olin, Stefan
Pilesjö, Petter
Investigating the influence of two different flow routing algorithms on soil–water–vegetation interactions using the dynamic ecosystem model LPJ‐GUESS
author_facet Tang, Jing
Miller, Paul A.
Crill, Patrick M.
Olin, Stefan
Pilesjö, Petter
author_sort Tang, Jing
title Investigating the influence of two different flow routing algorithms on soil–water–vegetation interactions using the dynamic ecosystem model LPJ‐GUESS
title_short Investigating the influence of two different flow routing algorithms on soil–water–vegetation interactions using the dynamic ecosystem model LPJ‐GUESS
title_full Investigating the influence of two different flow routing algorithms on soil–water–vegetation interactions using the dynamic ecosystem model LPJ‐GUESS
title_fullStr Investigating the influence of two different flow routing algorithms on soil–water–vegetation interactions using the dynamic ecosystem model LPJ‐GUESS
title_full_unstemmed Investigating the influence of two different flow routing algorithms on soil–water–vegetation interactions using the dynamic ecosystem model LPJ‐GUESS
title_sort investigating the influence of two different flow routing algorithms on soil–water–vegetation interactions using the dynamic ecosystem model lpj‐guess
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2014
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eco.1526
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Feco.1526
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/eco.1526
genre permafrost
Subarctic
genre_facet permafrost
Subarctic
op_source Ecohydrology
volume 8, issue 4, page 570-583
ISSN 1936-0584 1936-0592
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1526
container_title Ecohydrology
container_volume 8
container_issue 4
container_start_page 570
op_container_end_page 583
_version_ 1810471645689675776