Effects of agricultural practices on foraging habitats of a seabird species in the Baltic Sea

Abstract Omnivorous and opportunistic species may be good indicators of food availability. Gulls often use human‐impacted landscapes and may respond to changes by altering their feeding ecology. We investigated the foraging behavior of individual common gulls ( Larus canus ), focusing on their distr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecology and Evolution
Main Authors: Garthe, Stefan, Schwemmer, Philipp, Kubetzki, Ulrike, Heinze, Bernd
Other Authors: Bundesamt für Naturschutz
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9551
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ece3.9551
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/ece3.9551
id crwiley:10.1002/ece3.9551
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1002/ece3.9551 2024-06-02T08:10:03+00:00 Effects of agricultural practices on foraging habitats of a seabird species in the Baltic Sea Garthe, Stefan Schwemmer, Philipp Kubetzki, Ulrike Heinze, Bernd Bundesamt für Naturschutz 2022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9551 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ece3.9551 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/ece3.9551 en eng Wiley http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Ecology and Evolution volume 12, issue 11 ISSN 2045-7758 2045-7758 journal-article 2022 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9551 2024-05-03T11:25:14Z Abstract Omnivorous and opportunistic species may be good indicators of food availability. Gulls often use human‐impacted landscapes and may respond to changes by altering their feeding ecology. We investigated the foraging behavior of individual common gulls ( Larus canus ), focusing on their distribution during foraging and their selected habitat types. We tracked adult common gulls using GPS telemetry at their largest breeding colony in the southwestern Baltic Sea, Germany. Foraging habitats were analyzed from tracking data for three breeding seasons 2016, 2017, and 2019 and were compared with potentially available foraging habitats. Most breeding birds flew toward terrestrial areas. Feeding sites were located on average 11.7–14.3 km from the colony (range 0.9–36.5 km). Corn and sugar beet fields were used significantly and extensively compared with their availability in 2016 and 2017, while wheat, rape, and barley fields were used significantly less. Data from 2019 suggested seasonal shifts in habitat use. Birds spent between 30 and 1300 min per week at their preferred feeding sites, with significant differences between the major habitats selected. We found a stable, clear, multiyear pattern in common gull foraging behavior in relation to agricultural practices. Fields with little or no crop cover and thus access to the soil were preferred over fields with high crop cover. These results suggest that local food availability may be limiting further population increases in this species. Article in Journal/Newspaper Larus canus Wiley Online Library Ecology and Evolution 12 11
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract Omnivorous and opportunistic species may be good indicators of food availability. Gulls often use human‐impacted landscapes and may respond to changes by altering their feeding ecology. We investigated the foraging behavior of individual common gulls ( Larus canus ), focusing on their distribution during foraging and their selected habitat types. We tracked adult common gulls using GPS telemetry at their largest breeding colony in the southwestern Baltic Sea, Germany. Foraging habitats were analyzed from tracking data for three breeding seasons 2016, 2017, and 2019 and were compared with potentially available foraging habitats. Most breeding birds flew toward terrestrial areas. Feeding sites were located on average 11.7–14.3 km from the colony (range 0.9–36.5 km). Corn and sugar beet fields were used significantly and extensively compared with their availability in 2016 and 2017, while wheat, rape, and barley fields were used significantly less. Data from 2019 suggested seasonal shifts in habitat use. Birds spent between 30 and 1300 min per week at their preferred feeding sites, with significant differences between the major habitats selected. We found a stable, clear, multiyear pattern in common gull foraging behavior in relation to agricultural practices. Fields with little or no crop cover and thus access to the soil were preferred over fields with high crop cover. These results suggest that local food availability may be limiting further population increases in this species.
author2 Bundesamt für Naturschutz
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Garthe, Stefan
Schwemmer, Philipp
Kubetzki, Ulrike
Heinze, Bernd
spellingShingle Garthe, Stefan
Schwemmer, Philipp
Kubetzki, Ulrike
Heinze, Bernd
Effects of agricultural practices on foraging habitats of a seabird species in the Baltic Sea
author_facet Garthe, Stefan
Schwemmer, Philipp
Kubetzki, Ulrike
Heinze, Bernd
author_sort Garthe, Stefan
title Effects of agricultural practices on foraging habitats of a seabird species in the Baltic Sea
title_short Effects of agricultural practices on foraging habitats of a seabird species in the Baltic Sea
title_full Effects of agricultural practices on foraging habitats of a seabird species in the Baltic Sea
title_fullStr Effects of agricultural practices on foraging habitats of a seabird species in the Baltic Sea
title_full_unstemmed Effects of agricultural practices on foraging habitats of a seabird species in the Baltic Sea
title_sort effects of agricultural practices on foraging habitats of a seabird species in the baltic sea
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2022
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9551
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ece3.9551
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/ece3.9551
genre Larus canus
genre_facet Larus canus
op_source Ecology and Evolution
volume 12, issue 11
ISSN 2045-7758 2045-7758
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9551
container_title Ecology and Evolution
container_volume 12
container_issue 11
_version_ 1800755861498363904