Favorable spring conditions can buffer the impact of winter carryover effects on a key breeding decision in an Arctic‐breeding seabird

Abstract The availability and investment of energy among successive life‐history stages is a key feature of carryover effects. In migratory organisms, examining how both winter and spring experiences carryover to affect breeding activity is difficult due to the challenges in tracking individuals thr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecology and Evolution
Main Authors: Steenweg, Rolanda J., Crossin, Glenn T., Hennin, Holly L., Gilchrist, H. Grant, Love, Oliver P.
Other Authors: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8588
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ece3.8588
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/ece3.8588
id crwiley:10.1002/ece3.8588
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1002/ece3.8588 2024-09-30T14:30:21+00:00 Favorable spring conditions can buffer the impact of winter carryover effects on a key breeding decision in an Arctic‐breeding seabird Steenweg, Rolanda J. Crossin, Glenn T. Hennin, Holly L. Gilchrist, H. Grant Love, Oliver P. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada 2022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8588 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ece3.8588 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/ece3.8588 en eng Wiley http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Ecology and Evolution volume 12, issue 2 ISSN 2045-7758 2045-7758 journal-article 2022 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8588 2024-09-17T04:52:02Z Abstract The availability and investment of energy among successive life‐history stages is a key feature of carryover effects. In migratory organisms, examining how both winter and spring experiences carryover to affect breeding activity is difficult due to the challenges in tracking individuals through these periods without impacting their behavior, thereby biasing results. Using common eiders Somateria mollissima , we examined whether spring conditions at an Arctic breeding colony (East Bay Island, Nunavut, Canada) can buffer the impacts of winter temperatures on body mass and breeding decisions in birds that winter at different locations (Nuuk and Disko Bay, Greenland, and Newfoundland, Canada; assessed by analyzing stable isotopes of 13‐carbon in winter‐grown claw samples). Specifically, we used path analysis to examine how wintering and spring environmental conditions interact to affect breeding propensity (a key reproductive decision influencing lifetime fitness in female eiders) within the contexts of the timing of colony arrival, pre‐breeding body mass (body condition), and a physiological proxy for foraging effort (baseline corticosterone). We demonstrate that warmer winter temperatures predicted lower body mass at arrival to the nesting colony, whereas warmer spring temperatures predicted earlier arrival dates and higher arrival body mass. Both higher body mass and earlier arrival dates of eider hens increased the probability that birds would initiate laying (i.e., higher breeding propensity). However, variation in baseline corticosterone was not linked to either winter or spring temperatures, and it had no additional downstream effects on breeding propensity. Overall, we demonstrate that favorable pre‐breeding conditions in Arctic‐breeding common eiders can compensate for the impact that unfavorable wintering conditions can have on breeding investment, perhaps due to greater access to foraging areas prior to laying. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Disko Bay Greenland Newfoundland Nunavut Nuuk Somateria mollissima Wiley Online Library Arctic Nunavut Canada Greenland Nuuk ENVELOPE(-52.150,-52.150,68.717,68.717) East Bay ENVELOPE(-36.426,-36.426,-54.288,-54.288) Ecology and Evolution 12 2
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract The availability and investment of energy among successive life‐history stages is a key feature of carryover effects. In migratory organisms, examining how both winter and spring experiences carryover to affect breeding activity is difficult due to the challenges in tracking individuals through these periods without impacting their behavior, thereby biasing results. Using common eiders Somateria mollissima , we examined whether spring conditions at an Arctic breeding colony (East Bay Island, Nunavut, Canada) can buffer the impacts of winter temperatures on body mass and breeding decisions in birds that winter at different locations (Nuuk and Disko Bay, Greenland, and Newfoundland, Canada; assessed by analyzing stable isotopes of 13‐carbon in winter‐grown claw samples). Specifically, we used path analysis to examine how wintering and spring environmental conditions interact to affect breeding propensity (a key reproductive decision influencing lifetime fitness in female eiders) within the contexts of the timing of colony arrival, pre‐breeding body mass (body condition), and a physiological proxy for foraging effort (baseline corticosterone). We demonstrate that warmer winter temperatures predicted lower body mass at arrival to the nesting colony, whereas warmer spring temperatures predicted earlier arrival dates and higher arrival body mass. Both higher body mass and earlier arrival dates of eider hens increased the probability that birds would initiate laying (i.e., higher breeding propensity). However, variation in baseline corticosterone was not linked to either winter or spring temperatures, and it had no additional downstream effects on breeding propensity. Overall, we demonstrate that favorable pre‐breeding conditions in Arctic‐breeding common eiders can compensate for the impact that unfavorable wintering conditions can have on breeding investment, perhaps due to greater access to foraging areas prior to laying.
author2 Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Steenweg, Rolanda J.
Crossin, Glenn T.
Hennin, Holly L.
Gilchrist, H. Grant
Love, Oliver P.
spellingShingle Steenweg, Rolanda J.
Crossin, Glenn T.
Hennin, Holly L.
Gilchrist, H. Grant
Love, Oliver P.
Favorable spring conditions can buffer the impact of winter carryover effects on a key breeding decision in an Arctic‐breeding seabird
author_facet Steenweg, Rolanda J.
Crossin, Glenn T.
Hennin, Holly L.
Gilchrist, H. Grant
Love, Oliver P.
author_sort Steenweg, Rolanda J.
title Favorable spring conditions can buffer the impact of winter carryover effects on a key breeding decision in an Arctic‐breeding seabird
title_short Favorable spring conditions can buffer the impact of winter carryover effects on a key breeding decision in an Arctic‐breeding seabird
title_full Favorable spring conditions can buffer the impact of winter carryover effects on a key breeding decision in an Arctic‐breeding seabird
title_fullStr Favorable spring conditions can buffer the impact of winter carryover effects on a key breeding decision in an Arctic‐breeding seabird
title_full_unstemmed Favorable spring conditions can buffer the impact of winter carryover effects on a key breeding decision in an Arctic‐breeding seabird
title_sort favorable spring conditions can buffer the impact of winter carryover effects on a key breeding decision in an arctic‐breeding seabird
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2022
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8588
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ece3.8588
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/ece3.8588
long_lat ENVELOPE(-52.150,-52.150,68.717,68.717)
ENVELOPE(-36.426,-36.426,-54.288,-54.288)
geographic Arctic
Nunavut
Canada
Greenland
Nuuk
East Bay
geographic_facet Arctic
Nunavut
Canada
Greenland
Nuuk
East Bay
genre Arctic
Disko Bay
Greenland
Newfoundland
Nunavut
Nuuk
Somateria mollissima
genre_facet Arctic
Disko Bay
Greenland
Newfoundland
Nunavut
Nuuk
Somateria mollissima
op_source Ecology and Evolution
volume 12, issue 2
ISSN 2045-7758 2045-7758
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8588
container_title Ecology and Evolution
container_volume 12
container_issue 2
_version_ 1811635340216107008