Using fractal self‐similarity to increase precision of shrub biomass estimates

Abstract We show that aerial tips are self‐similar fractals of whole shrubs and present a field method that applies this fact to improves accuracy and precision of biomass estimates of tall‐shrubs, defined here as those with diameter at root collar (DRC) ≥ 2.5 cm. Power function allometry of biomass...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecology and Evolution
Main Authors: Dial, Roman J., Schulz, Bethany, Lewis‐Clark, Eric, Martin, Kaili, Andersen, Hans‐Erik
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7393
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ece3.7393
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/ece3.7393
id crwiley:10.1002/ece3.7393
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1002/ece3.7393 2024-06-02T08:02:42+00:00 Using fractal self‐similarity to increase precision of shrub biomass estimates Dial, Roman J. Schulz, Bethany Lewis‐Clark, Eric Martin, Kaili Andersen, Hans‐Erik 2021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7393 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ece3.7393 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/ece3.7393 en eng Wiley http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Ecology and Evolution volume 11, issue 9, page 4866-4873 ISSN 2045-7758 2045-7758 journal-article 2021 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7393 2024-05-03T11:59:46Z Abstract We show that aerial tips are self‐similar fractals of whole shrubs and present a field method that applies this fact to improves accuracy and precision of biomass estimates of tall‐shrubs, defined here as those with diameter at root collar (DRC) ≥ 2.5 cm. Power function allometry of biomass to stem diameter generates a disproportionate prediction error that increases rapidly with diameter. Thus, biomass should be modeled as a single measure of stem diameter only if stem diameter is less than a threshold D max . When stem diameter exceeds D max , then the stem internode should be treated as a conic frustrum requiring two additional measures: a second, node‐adjacent diameter and a length. If the second diameter is less than D max , then the power function allometry can be applied to the aerial tip; otherwise an additional internode is measured. This “two‐component” allometry—internodes as frustra and aerial tips as shrubs—can reduce estimated biomass error propagated to the plot‐level by as much as 50% or more where very large shrubs are present D max is any diameter such that the ratio of single‐component to two‐component uncertainty exceeds the ratio of two‐component to single‐component measurement time. Guidelines for estimating D max based on pilot field data are provided. Tall shrubs are increasing in abundance and distribution across Arctic, alpine, boreal, and dryland ecosystems. Estimating their biomass is important for both ecological studies and carbon accounting. Reducing field‐sample prediction error increases precision in multi‐stage modeling because additional measures efficiently improve plot‐level biomass precision, reducing uncertainty for shrub biomass estimates. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Wiley Online Library Arctic Ecology and Evolution 11 9 4866 4873
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract We show that aerial tips are self‐similar fractals of whole shrubs and present a field method that applies this fact to improves accuracy and precision of biomass estimates of tall‐shrubs, defined here as those with diameter at root collar (DRC) ≥ 2.5 cm. Power function allometry of biomass to stem diameter generates a disproportionate prediction error that increases rapidly with diameter. Thus, biomass should be modeled as a single measure of stem diameter only if stem diameter is less than a threshold D max . When stem diameter exceeds D max , then the stem internode should be treated as a conic frustrum requiring two additional measures: a second, node‐adjacent diameter and a length. If the second diameter is less than D max , then the power function allometry can be applied to the aerial tip; otherwise an additional internode is measured. This “two‐component” allometry—internodes as frustra and aerial tips as shrubs—can reduce estimated biomass error propagated to the plot‐level by as much as 50% or more where very large shrubs are present D max is any diameter such that the ratio of single‐component to two‐component uncertainty exceeds the ratio of two‐component to single‐component measurement time. Guidelines for estimating D max based on pilot field data are provided. Tall shrubs are increasing in abundance and distribution across Arctic, alpine, boreal, and dryland ecosystems. Estimating their biomass is important for both ecological studies and carbon accounting. Reducing field‐sample prediction error increases precision in multi‐stage modeling because additional measures efficiently improve plot‐level biomass precision, reducing uncertainty for shrub biomass estimates.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Dial, Roman J.
Schulz, Bethany
Lewis‐Clark, Eric
Martin, Kaili
Andersen, Hans‐Erik
spellingShingle Dial, Roman J.
Schulz, Bethany
Lewis‐Clark, Eric
Martin, Kaili
Andersen, Hans‐Erik
Using fractal self‐similarity to increase precision of shrub biomass estimates
author_facet Dial, Roman J.
Schulz, Bethany
Lewis‐Clark, Eric
Martin, Kaili
Andersen, Hans‐Erik
author_sort Dial, Roman J.
title Using fractal self‐similarity to increase precision of shrub biomass estimates
title_short Using fractal self‐similarity to increase precision of shrub biomass estimates
title_full Using fractal self‐similarity to increase precision of shrub biomass estimates
title_fullStr Using fractal self‐similarity to increase precision of shrub biomass estimates
title_full_unstemmed Using fractal self‐similarity to increase precision of shrub biomass estimates
title_sort using fractal self‐similarity to increase precision of shrub biomass estimates
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2021
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7393
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ece3.7393
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/ece3.7393
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source Ecology and Evolution
volume 11, issue 9, page 4866-4873
ISSN 2045-7758 2045-7758
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7393
container_title Ecology and Evolution
container_volume 11
container_issue 9
container_start_page 4866
op_container_end_page 4873
_version_ 1800747178547740672