Shrub canopies influence soil temperatures but not nutrient dynamics: An experimental test of tundra snow–shrub interactions

Abstract Shrubs are the largest plant life form in tundra ecosystems; therefore, any changes in the abundance of shrubs will feedback to influence biodiversity, ecosystem function, and climate. The snow–shrub hypothesis asserts that shrub canopies trap snow and insulate soils in winter, increasing t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecology and Evolution
Main Authors: Myers‐Smith, Isla H., Hik, David S.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.710
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fece3.710
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ece3.710
id crwiley:10.1002/ece3.710
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1002/ece3.710 2024-06-23T07:57:16+00:00 Shrub canopies influence soil temperatures but not nutrient dynamics: An experimental test of tundra snow–shrub interactions Myers‐Smith, Isla H. Hik, David S. 2013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.710 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fece3.710 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ece3.710 en eng Wiley http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Ecology and Evolution volume 3, issue 11, page 3683-3700 ISSN 2045-7758 2045-7758 journal-article 2013 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.710 2024-06-13T04:25:18Z Abstract Shrubs are the largest plant life form in tundra ecosystems; therefore, any changes in the abundance of shrubs will feedback to influence biodiversity, ecosystem function, and climate. The snow–shrub hypothesis asserts that shrub canopies trap snow and insulate soils in winter, increasing the rates of nutrient cycling to create a positive feedback to shrub expansion. However, previous work has not been able to separate the abiotic from the biotic influences of shrub canopies. We conducted a 3‐year factorial experiment to determine the influences of canopies on soil temperatures and nutrient cycling parameters by removing ~0.5 m high willow ( Salix spp.) and birch ( Betula glandulosa ) shrubs, creating artificial shrub canopies and comparing these manipulations to nearby open tundra and shrub patches. Soil temperatures were 4–5°C warmer in January, and 2°C cooler in July under shrub cover. Natural shrub plots had 14–33 cm more snow in January than adjacent open tundra plots. Snow cover and soil temperatures were similar in the manipulated plots when compared with the respective unmanipulated treatments, indicating that shrub canopy cover was a dominant factor influencing the soil thermal regime. Conversely, we found no strong evidence of increased soil decomposition, CO 2 fluxes, or nitrate or ammonia adsorbtion under artificial shrub canopy treatments when compared with unmanipulated open tundra. Our results suggest that the abiotic influences of shrub canopy cover alone on nutrient dynamics are weaker than previously asserted. Article in Journal/Newspaper Tundra Wiley Online Library Ecology and Evolution 3 11 3683 3700
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract Shrubs are the largest plant life form in tundra ecosystems; therefore, any changes in the abundance of shrubs will feedback to influence biodiversity, ecosystem function, and climate. The snow–shrub hypothesis asserts that shrub canopies trap snow and insulate soils in winter, increasing the rates of nutrient cycling to create a positive feedback to shrub expansion. However, previous work has not been able to separate the abiotic from the biotic influences of shrub canopies. We conducted a 3‐year factorial experiment to determine the influences of canopies on soil temperatures and nutrient cycling parameters by removing ~0.5 m high willow ( Salix spp.) and birch ( Betula glandulosa ) shrubs, creating artificial shrub canopies and comparing these manipulations to nearby open tundra and shrub patches. Soil temperatures were 4–5°C warmer in January, and 2°C cooler in July under shrub cover. Natural shrub plots had 14–33 cm more snow in January than adjacent open tundra plots. Snow cover and soil temperatures were similar in the manipulated plots when compared with the respective unmanipulated treatments, indicating that shrub canopy cover was a dominant factor influencing the soil thermal regime. Conversely, we found no strong evidence of increased soil decomposition, CO 2 fluxes, or nitrate or ammonia adsorbtion under artificial shrub canopy treatments when compared with unmanipulated open tundra. Our results suggest that the abiotic influences of shrub canopy cover alone on nutrient dynamics are weaker than previously asserted.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Myers‐Smith, Isla H.
Hik, David S.
spellingShingle Myers‐Smith, Isla H.
Hik, David S.
Shrub canopies influence soil temperatures but not nutrient dynamics: An experimental test of tundra snow–shrub interactions
author_facet Myers‐Smith, Isla H.
Hik, David S.
author_sort Myers‐Smith, Isla H.
title Shrub canopies influence soil temperatures but not nutrient dynamics: An experimental test of tundra snow–shrub interactions
title_short Shrub canopies influence soil temperatures but not nutrient dynamics: An experimental test of tundra snow–shrub interactions
title_full Shrub canopies influence soil temperatures but not nutrient dynamics: An experimental test of tundra snow–shrub interactions
title_fullStr Shrub canopies influence soil temperatures but not nutrient dynamics: An experimental test of tundra snow–shrub interactions
title_full_unstemmed Shrub canopies influence soil temperatures but not nutrient dynamics: An experimental test of tundra snow–shrub interactions
title_sort shrub canopies influence soil temperatures but not nutrient dynamics: an experimental test of tundra snow–shrub interactions
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2013
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.710
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fece3.710
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ece3.710
genre Tundra
genre_facet Tundra
op_source Ecology and Evolution
volume 3, issue 11, page 3683-3700
ISSN 2045-7758 2045-7758
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.710
container_title Ecology and Evolution
container_volume 3
container_issue 11
container_start_page 3683
op_container_end_page 3700
_version_ 1802650824367669248