Extensive genetic differentiation between recently evolved sympatric Arctic charr morphs

• Published in: Ecology and Evolution
• Main Authors: Guðbrandsson, Jóhannes, Kapralova, Kalina H., Franzdóttir, Sigríður R., Bergsveinsdóttir, Þóra Margrét, Hafstað, Völundur, Jónsson, Zophonías O., Snorrason, Sigurður S., Pálsson, Arnar
• Other Authors: Icelandic Centre for Research
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2019
• Subjects: Arctic charr; Iceland; Salvelinus alpinus; Þingvallavatn
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5516; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fece3.5516; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ece3.5516; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/ece3.5516

Abstract The availability of diverse ecological niches can promote adaptation of trophic specializations and related traits, as has been repeatedly observed in evolutionary radiations of freshwater fish. The role of genetics, environment, and history in ecologically driven divergence and adaptation, can be studied on adaptive radiations or populations showing ecological polymorphism. Salmonids, especially the Salvelinus genus, are renowned for both phenotypic diversity and polymorphism. Arctic charr ( Salvelinus alpinus ) invaded Icelandic streams during the glacial retreat (about 10,000 years ago) and exhibits many instances of sympatric polymorphism. Particularly, well studied are the four morphs in Lake Þingvallavatn in Iceland. The small benthic (SB), large benthic (LB), planktivorous (PL), and piscivorous (PI) charr differ in many regards, including size, form, and life history traits. To investigate relatedness and genomic differentiation between morphs, we identified variable sites from RNA‐sequencing data from three of those morphs and verified 22 variants in population samples. The data reveal genetic differences between the morphs, with the two benthic morphs being more similar and the PL‐charr more genetically different. The markers with high differentiation map to all linkage groups, suggesting ancient and pervasive genetic separation of these three morphs. Furthermore, GO analyses suggest differences in collagen metabolism, odontogenesis, and sensory systems between PL‐charr and the benthic morphs. Genotyping in population samples from all four morphs confirms the genetic separation and indicates that the PI‐charr are less genetically distinct than the other three morphs. The genetic separation of the other three morphs indicates certain degree of reproductive isolation. The extent of gene flow between the morphs and the nature of reproductive barriers between them remain to be elucidated.