Linking demographic and food‐web models to understand management trade‐offs

Abstract Alternatives in ecosystem‐based management often differ with respect to trade‐offs between ecosystem values. Ecosystem or food‐web models and demographic models are typically employed to evaluate alternatives, but the approaches are rarely integrated to uncover conflicts between values. We...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecology and Evolution
Main Authors: Kadin, Martina, Frederiksen, Morten, Niiranen, Susa, Converse, Sarah J.
Other Authors: Vetenskapsrådet
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5385
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fece3.5385
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ece3.5385
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/ece3.5385
id crwiley:10.1002/ece3.5385
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1002/ece3.5385 2024-06-02T08:15:31+00:00 Linking demographic and food‐web models to understand management trade‐offs Kadin, Martina Frederiksen, Morten Niiranen, Susa Converse, Sarah J. Vetenskapsrådet 2019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5385 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fece3.5385 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ece3.5385 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/ece3.5385 en eng Wiley http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Ecology and Evolution volume 9, issue 15, page 8587-8600 ISSN 2045-7758 2045-7758 journal-article 2019 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5385 2024-05-03T11:54:40Z Abstract Alternatives in ecosystem‐based management often differ with respect to trade‐offs between ecosystem values. Ecosystem or food‐web models and demographic models are typically employed to evaluate alternatives, but the approaches are rarely integrated to uncover conflicts between values. We applied multistate models to a capture–recapture dataset on common guillemots Uria aalge breeding in the Baltic Sea to identify factors influencing survival. The estimated relationships were employed together with Ecopath‐with‐Ecosim food‐web model simulations to project guillemot survival under six future scenarios incorporating climate change. The scenarios were based on management alternatives for eutrophication and cod fisheries, issues considered top priority for regional management, but without known direct effects on the guillemot population. Our demographic models identified prey quantity (abundance and biomass of sprat Sprattus sprattus ) as the main factor influencing guillemot survival. Most scenarios resulted in projections of increased survival, in the near (2016–2040) and distant (2060–2085) future. However, in the scenario of reduced nutrient input and precautionary cod fishing, guillemot survival was projected to be lower in both future periods due to lower sprat stocks. Matrix population models suggested a substantial decline of the guillemot population in the near future, 24% per 10 years, and a smaller reduction, 1.1% per 10 years, in the distant future. To date, many stakeholders and Baltic Sea governments have supported reduced nutrient input and precautionary cod fishing and implementation is underway. Negative effects on nonfocal species have previously not been uncovered, but our results show that the scenario is likely to negatively impact the guillemot population. Linking model results allowed identifying trade‐offs associated with management alternatives. This information is critical to thorough evaluation by decision‐makers, but not easily obtained by food‐web models or demographic models ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Uria aalge uria Wiley Online Library Ecology and Evolution 9 15 8587 8600
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract Alternatives in ecosystem‐based management often differ with respect to trade‐offs between ecosystem values. Ecosystem or food‐web models and demographic models are typically employed to evaluate alternatives, but the approaches are rarely integrated to uncover conflicts between values. We applied multistate models to a capture–recapture dataset on common guillemots Uria aalge breeding in the Baltic Sea to identify factors influencing survival. The estimated relationships were employed together with Ecopath‐with‐Ecosim food‐web model simulations to project guillemot survival under six future scenarios incorporating climate change. The scenarios were based on management alternatives for eutrophication and cod fisheries, issues considered top priority for regional management, but without known direct effects on the guillemot population. Our demographic models identified prey quantity (abundance and biomass of sprat Sprattus sprattus ) as the main factor influencing guillemot survival. Most scenarios resulted in projections of increased survival, in the near (2016–2040) and distant (2060–2085) future. However, in the scenario of reduced nutrient input and precautionary cod fishing, guillemot survival was projected to be lower in both future periods due to lower sprat stocks. Matrix population models suggested a substantial decline of the guillemot population in the near future, 24% per 10 years, and a smaller reduction, 1.1% per 10 years, in the distant future. To date, many stakeholders and Baltic Sea governments have supported reduced nutrient input and precautionary cod fishing and implementation is underway. Negative effects on nonfocal species have previously not been uncovered, but our results show that the scenario is likely to negatively impact the guillemot population. Linking model results allowed identifying trade‐offs associated with management alternatives. This information is critical to thorough evaluation by decision‐makers, but not easily obtained by food‐web models or demographic models ...
author2 Vetenskapsrådet
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Kadin, Martina
Frederiksen, Morten
Niiranen, Susa
Converse, Sarah J.
spellingShingle Kadin, Martina
Frederiksen, Morten
Niiranen, Susa
Converse, Sarah J.
Linking demographic and food‐web models to understand management trade‐offs
author_facet Kadin, Martina
Frederiksen, Morten
Niiranen, Susa
Converse, Sarah J.
author_sort Kadin, Martina
title Linking demographic and food‐web models to understand management trade‐offs
title_short Linking demographic and food‐web models to understand management trade‐offs
title_full Linking demographic and food‐web models to understand management trade‐offs
title_fullStr Linking demographic and food‐web models to understand management trade‐offs
title_full_unstemmed Linking demographic and food‐web models to understand management trade‐offs
title_sort linking demographic and food‐web models to understand management trade‐offs
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2019
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5385
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fece3.5385
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ece3.5385
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/ece3.5385
genre Uria aalge
uria
genre_facet Uria aalge
uria
op_source Ecology and Evolution
volume 9, issue 15, page 8587-8600
ISSN 2045-7758 2045-7758
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5385
container_title Ecology and Evolution
container_volume 9
container_issue 15
container_start_page 8587
op_container_end_page 8600
_version_ 1800739713606221824