A local evaluation of the individual state‐space to scale up Bayesian spatial capture–recapture

Abstract Spatial capture–recapture models (SCR) are used to estimate animal density and to investigate a range of problems in spatial ecology that cannot be addressed with traditional nonspatial methods. Bayesian approaches in particular offer tremendous flexibility for SCR modeling. Increasingly, S...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecology and Evolution
Main Authors: Milleret, Cyril, Dupont, Pierre, Bonenfant, Christophe, Brøseth, Henrik, Flagstad, Øystein, Sutherland, Chris, Bischof, Richard
Other Authors: Environment Agency, Environmental Protection Agency
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4751
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fece3.4751
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ece3.4751
id crwiley:10.1002/ece3.4751
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1002/ece3.4751 2024-09-15T18:10:30+00:00 A local evaluation of the individual state‐space to scale up Bayesian spatial capture–recapture Milleret, Cyril Dupont, Pierre Bonenfant, Christophe Brøseth, Henrik Flagstad, Øystein Sutherland, Chris Bischof, Richard Environment Agency Environmental Protection Agency 2018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4751 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fece3.4751 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ece3.4751 en eng Wiley http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Ecology and Evolution volume 9, issue 1, page 352-363 ISSN 2045-7758 2045-7758 journal-article 2018 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4751 2024-08-09T04:19:48Z Abstract Spatial capture–recapture models (SCR) are used to estimate animal density and to investigate a range of problems in spatial ecology that cannot be addressed with traditional nonspatial methods. Bayesian approaches in particular offer tremendous flexibility for SCR modeling. Increasingly, SCR data are being collected over very large spatial extents making analysis computational intensive, sometimes prohibitively so. To mitigate the computational burden of large‐scale SCR models, we developed an improved formulation of the Bayesian SCR model that uses local evaluation of the individual state‐space (LESS). Based on prior knowledge about a species’ home range size, we created square evaluation windows that restrict the spatial domain in which an individual's detection probability (detector window) and activity center location (AC window) are estimated. We used simulations and empirical data analyses to assess the performance and bias of SCR with LESS. LESS produced unbiased estimates of SCR parameters when the AC window width was ≥5σ ( σ : the scale parameter of the half‐normal detection function), and when the detector window extended beyond the edge of the AC window by 2 σ . Importantly, LESS considerably decreased the computation time needed for fitting SCR models. In our simulations, LESS increased the computation speed of SCR models up to 57‐fold. We demonstrate the power of this new approach by mapping the density of an elusive large carnivore—the wolverine ( Gulo gulo )—with an unprecedented resolution and across the species’ entire range in Norway (> 200,000 km 2 ). Our approach helps overcome a major computational obstacle to population and landscape‐level SCR analyses. The LESS implementation in a Bayesian framework makes the customization and fitting of SCR accessible for practitioners working at scales that are relevant for conservation and management. Article in Journal/Newspaper Gulo gulo wolverine Wiley Online Library Ecology and Evolution 9 1 352 363
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract Spatial capture–recapture models (SCR) are used to estimate animal density and to investigate a range of problems in spatial ecology that cannot be addressed with traditional nonspatial methods. Bayesian approaches in particular offer tremendous flexibility for SCR modeling. Increasingly, SCR data are being collected over very large spatial extents making analysis computational intensive, sometimes prohibitively so. To mitigate the computational burden of large‐scale SCR models, we developed an improved formulation of the Bayesian SCR model that uses local evaluation of the individual state‐space (LESS). Based on prior knowledge about a species’ home range size, we created square evaluation windows that restrict the spatial domain in which an individual's detection probability (detector window) and activity center location (AC window) are estimated. We used simulations and empirical data analyses to assess the performance and bias of SCR with LESS. LESS produced unbiased estimates of SCR parameters when the AC window width was ≥5σ ( σ : the scale parameter of the half‐normal detection function), and when the detector window extended beyond the edge of the AC window by 2 σ . Importantly, LESS considerably decreased the computation time needed for fitting SCR models. In our simulations, LESS increased the computation speed of SCR models up to 57‐fold. We demonstrate the power of this new approach by mapping the density of an elusive large carnivore—the wolverine ( Gulo gulo )—with an unprecedented resolution and across the species’ entire range in Norway (> 200,000 km 2 ). Our approach helps overcome a major computational obstacle to population and landscape‐level SCR analyses. The LESS implementation in a Bayesian framework makes the customization and fitting of SCR accessible for practitioners working at scales that are relevant for conservation and management.
author2 Environment Agency
Environmental Protection Agency
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Milleret, Cyril
Dupont, Pierre
Bonenfant, Christophe
Brøseth, Henrik
Flagstad, Øystein
Sutherland, Chris
Bischof, Richard
spellingShingle Milleret, Cyril
Dupont, Pierre
Bonenfant, Christophe
Brøseth, Henrik
Flagstad, Øystein
Sutherland, Chris
Bischof, Richard
A local evaluation of the individual state‐space to scale up Bayesian spatial capture–recapture
author_facet Milleret, Cyril
Dupont, Pierre
Bonenfant, Christophe
Brøseth, Henrik
Flagstad, Øystein
Sutherland, Chris
Bischof, Richard
author_sort Milleret, Cyril
title A local evaluation of the individual state‐space to scale up Bayesian spatial capture–recapture
title_short A local evaluation of the individual state‐space to scale up Bayesian spatial capture–recapture
title_full A local evaluation of the individual state‐space to scale up Bayesian spatial capture–recapture
title_fullStr A local evaluation of the individual state‐space to scale up Bayesian spatial capture–recapture
title_full_unstemmed A local evaluation of the individual state‐space to scale up Bayesian spatial capture–recapture
title_sort local evaluation of the individual state‐space to scale up bayesian spatial capture–recapture
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2018
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4751
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fece3.4751
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ece3.4751
genre Gulo gulo
wolverine
genre_facet Gulo gulo
wolverine
op_source Ecology and Evolution
volume 9, issue 1, page 352-363
ISSN 2045-7758 2045-7758
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4751
container_title Ecology and Evolution
container_volume 9
container_issue 1
container_start_page 352
op_container_end_page 363
_version_ 1810448101352144896