Consequences of cross‐season demographic correlations for population viability

• Published in: Ecology and Evolution
• Main Authors: Layton‐Matthews, Kate, Reiertsen, Tone K., Erikstad, Kjell‐Einar, Anker‐Nilssen, Tycho, Daunt, Francis, Wanless, Sarah, Barrett, Robert T., Newell, Mark A., Harris, Mike P.
• Other Authors: Miljødirektoratet, Natural Environment Research Council, Norges Forskningsråd
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2023
• Subjects: Atlantic puffin; fratercula; Fratercula arctica
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10312; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ece3.10312

Abstract Demographic correlations are pervasive in wildlife populations and can represent important secondary drivers of population growth. Empirical evidence suggests that correlations are in general positive for long‐lived species, but little is known about the degree of variation among spatially segregated populations of the same species in relation to environmental conditions. We assessed the relative importance of two cross‐season correlations in survival and productivity, for three Atlantic puffin ( Fratercula arctica ) populations with contrasting population trajectories and non‐overlapping year‐round distributions. The two correlations reflected either a relationship between adult survival prior to breeding on productivity, or a relationship between productivity and adult survival the subsequent year. Demographic rates and their correlations were estimated with an integrated population model, and their respective contributions to variation in population growth were calculated using a transient‐life table response experiment. For all three populations, demographic correlations were positive at both time lags, although their strength differed. Given the different year‐round distributions of these populations, this variation in the strength population‐level demographic correlations points to environmental conditions as an important driver of demographic variation through life‐history constraints. Consequently, the contributions of variances and correlations in demographic rates to population growth rates differed among puffin populations, which has implications for—particularly small—populations' viability under environmental change as positive correlations tend to reduce the stochastic population growth rate.