Harvest and density‐dependent predation drive long‐term population decline in a northern ungulate

Abstract The relative effect of top‐down versus bottom‐up forces in regulating and limiting wildlife populations is an important theme in ecology. Untangling these effects is critical for a basic understanding of trophic dynamics and effective management. We examined the drivers of moose ( Alces alc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecological Applications
Main Authors: Marrotte, Robby R., Patterson, Brent R., Northrup, Joseph M.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.2629
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/eap.2629
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/eap.2629
https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/eap.2629
id crwiley:10.1002/eap.2629
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1002/eap.2629 2024-10-20T14:02:36+00:00 Harvest and density‐dependent predation drive long‐term population decline in a northern ungulate Marrotte, Robby R. Patterson, Brent R. Northrup, Joseph M. 2022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.2629 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/eap.2629 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/eap.2629 https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/eap.2629 en eng Wiley http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Ecological Applications volume 32, issue 6 ISSN 1051-0761 1939-5582 journal-article 2022 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2629 2024-09-23T04:37:27Z Abstract The relative effect of top‐down versus bottom‐up forces in regulating and limiting wildlife populations is an important theme in ecology. Untangling these effects is critical for a basic understanding of trophic dynamics and effective management. We examined the drivers of moose ( Alces alces ) population growth by integrating two independent sources of observations within a hierarchical Bayesian population model. We used one of the largest existing spatiotemporal data sets on ungulate population dynamics globally. We documented a 20% population decline over the period examined. There was negative density‐dependent population growth of moose. Although we could not determine the mechanisms producing density‐dependent suppression of population growth, the relatively low densities at which we documented moose populations suggested it could be due to density‐dependent predation. Predation primarily limited population growth, except at low density, where it was regulating. After we simulated several harvest scenarios, it appeared that harvest was largely additive and likely contributed to population declines. Our results highlight how population dynamics are context dependent and vary strongly across gradients in climate, forest type, and predator abundance. These results help clarify long‐standing questions in population ecology and highlight the complex relationships between natural and human‐caused mortality in driving ungulate population dynamics. Article in Journal/Newspaper Alces alces Wiley Online Library Ecological Applications 32 6
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract The relative effect of top‐down versus bottom‐up forces in regulating and limiting wildlife populations is an important theme in ecology. Untangling these effects is critical for a basic understanding of trophic dynamics and effective management. We examined the drivers of moose ( Alces alces ) population growth by integrating two independent sources of observations within a hierarchical Bayesian population model. We used one of the largest existing spatiotemporal data sets on ungulate population dynamics globally. We documented a 20% population decline over the period examined. There was negative density‐dependent population growth of moose. Although we could not determine the mechanisms producing density‐dependent suppression of population growth, the relatively low densities at which we documented moose populations suggested it could be due to density‐dependent predation. Predation primarily limited population growth, except at low density, where it was regulating. After we simulated several harvest scenarios, it appeared that harvest was largely additive and likely contributed to population declines. Our results highlight how population dynamics are context dependent and vary strongly across gradients in climate, forest type, and predator abundance. These results help clarify long‐standing questions in population ecology and highlight the complex relationships between natural and human‐caused mortality in driving ungulate population dynamics.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Marrotte, Robby R.
Patterson, Brent R.
Northrup, Joseph M.
spellingShingle Marrotte, Robby R.
Patterson, Brent R.
Northrup, Joseph M.
Harvest and density‐dependent predation drive long‐term population decline in a northern ungulate
author_facet Marrotte, Robby R.
Patterson, Brent R.
Northrup, Joseph M.
author_sort Marrotte, Robby R.
title Harvest and density‐dependent predation drive long‐term population decline in a northern ungulate
title_short Harvest and density‐dependent predation drive long‐term population decline in a northern ungulate
title_full Harvest and density‐dependent predation drive long‐term population decline in a northern ungulate
title_fullStr Harvest and density‐dependent predation drive long‐term population decline in a northern ungulate
title_full_unstemmed Harvest and density‐dependent predation drive long‐term population decline in a northern ungulate
title_sort harvest and density‐dependent predation drive long‐term population decline in a northern ungulate
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2022
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.2629
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/eap.2629
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/eap.2629
https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/eap.2629
genre Alces alces
genre_facet Alces alces
op_source Ecological Applications
volume 32, issue 6
ISSN 1051-0761 1939-5582
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2629
container_title Ecological Applications
container_volume 32
container_issue 6
_version_ 1813453673353707520